The tests in isVTRNMask and isVTRN_v_undef_Mask should also check that the elements of the upper and lower half of the vectorshuffle occur in the correct order when both halves are used. Without this test the code assumes that it is correct to use vector transpose (vtrn) for the masks <1, 1, 0, 0> and <1, 3, 0, 2>, among others, but the transpose actually incorrectly generates shuffles for <0, 0, 1, 1> and <0, 2, 1, 3> in this case.
Patch by Jeroen Ketema!
llvm-svn: 247254
The logic of this follows something Howard does in libc++ and something
I discussed with Chris eons ago -- for a lot of functions, there is
really no benefit to preserving "debug information" by leaving the
out-of-line even in debug builds. This is especially true as we now do
a very good job of preserving most debug information even in the face of
inlining. There are a bunch of methods in StringRef that we are paying
a completely unacceptable amount for with every debug build of every
LLVM developer.
Some day, we should fix Clang/LLVM so that developers can reasonable
use a default of something other than '-O0' and not waste their lives
waiting on *completely* unoptimized code to execute. We should have
a default that doesn't impede debugging while providing at least
plausable performance.
But today is not that day.
So today, I'm applying always_inline to the functions that are really
hurting the critical path for stuff like 'check_llvm'. I'm being very
cautious here, but there are a few other APIs that we really should do
this for as a matter of pragmatism. Hopefully we can rip this out some
day.
With this change, TripleTest.Normalization runtime decreases by over
10%, and the total 'check-llvm' time on my 48-core box goes from 38s to
just under 37s.
llvm-svn: 247253
'inline' specifier. That specifier may or may not be valid for a given
function, or it may be required for correct linkage even when the
compiler doesn't support the always_inline attribute.
llvm-svn: 247252
Currently all variables used in OpenMP regions are captured into a record and passed to outlined functions in this record. It may result in some poor performance because of too complex analysis later in optimization passes. Patch makes to emit outlined functions for parallel-based regions with a list of captured variables. It reduces code for 2*n GEPs, stores and loads at least.
Codegen for task-based regions remains unchanged because runtime requires that all captured variables are passed in captured record.
llvm-svn: 247251
re-using the resulting components rather than repeatedly splitting and
re-splitting to compute each component as part of the initializer list.
This is more work on PR23676. Sadly, it doesn't help much. It removes
the constructor from my profile, but doesn't make a sufficient dent in
the total time. But it should play together nicely with subsequent
changes.
llvm-svn: 247250
with the StringRef::split method when used with a MaxSplit argument
other than '-1' (which nobody really does today, but which should
actually work).
The spec claimed both to split up to MaxSplit times, but also to append
<= MaxSplit strings to the vector. One of these doesn't make sense.
Given the name "MaxSplit", let's go with it being a max over how many
*splits* occur, which means the max on how many strings get appended is
MaxSplit+1. I'm not actually sure the implementation correctly provided
this logic either, as it used a really opaque loop structure.
The implementation was also playing weird games with nullptr in the data
field to try to rely on a totally opaque hidden property of the split
method that returns a pair. Nasty IMO.
Replace all of this with what is (IMO) simpler code that doesn't use the
pair returning split method, and instead just finds each separator and
appends directly. I think this is a lot easier to read, and it most
definitely matches the spec. Added some tests that exercise the corner
cases around StringRef() and StringRef("") that all now pass.
I'll start using this in code in the next commit.
llvm-svn: 247249
Given a reference to a pointer to member whose class's inheritance model
is unspecified, make sure we come up with an inheritance model in
plausible places. One place we were missing involved LValue to RValue
conversion, another involved unary type traits.
llvm-svn: 247248
on StringRef. Finding and splitting on a single character is
substantially faster than doing it on even a single character StringRef
-- we immediately get to a *very* tuned memchr call this way.
Even nicer, we get to this even in a debug build, shaving 18% off the
runtime of TripleTest.Normalization, helping PR23676 some more.
llvm-svn: 247244
CMake.
The Go bindings tests in an unoptimized build take over 30 seconds for
me, making it the slowest test in 'check-llvm' by a factor of two.
I've only rigged this up fully to the CMake build. If someone is
interested in rigging it up to the autoconf build, they're welcome to do
so.
llvm-svn: 247243
Summary:
PR24757 was caused by some incorect math in
`ScalarEvolution::HowFarToZero` -- the smallest unsigned solution for X
in
2^N * A = 2^N * X
is not necessarily A.
Reviewers: atrick, majnemer, meheff
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12721
llvm-svn: 247242
don't correctly implement the scoping rules of C++11 range based for
loops. This kind of aliasing isn't a good idea anyways (and wasn't
really intended).
llvm-svn: 247241
manager to avoid a slow linear scan of every immutable pass and on every
attempt to find an analysis pass.
This speeds up 'check-llvm' on an unoptimized build for me by 15%, YMMV.
It should also help (a tiny bit) other folks that are really
bottlenecked on repeated runs of tiny pass pipelines across small IR
files.
llvm-svn: 247240
This flag causes the compiler to emit bit set entries for functions as well
as runtime bitset checks at indirect call sites. Depends on the new function
bitset mechanism.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11857
llvm-svn: 247238
The changes in this patch are as follows:
1. Modify the emitPrologue and emitEpilogue methods to work properly when the prologue and epilogue blocks are not the first/last blocks in the function
2. Fix a bug in PPCEarlyReturn optimization caused by an empty entry block in the function
3. Override the runShrinkWrap PredicateFtor (defined in TargetMachine) to check whether shrink wrapping should run:
Shrink wrapping will run on PPC64 (Little Endian and Big Endian) unless -enable-shrink-wrap=false is specified on command line
A new test case, ppc-shrink-wrapping.ll was created based on the existing shrink wrapping tests for x86, arm, and arm64.
Phabricator review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11817
llvm-svn: 247237
First, we need to teach isFrameOffsetLegal about STNP.
It already knew about the STP/LDP variants, but those were probably
never exercised, because it's only the load/store optimizer that
generates STP/LDP, and the only user of the method is frame lowering,
which runs earlier.
The STP/LDP cases were wrong: they didn't take into account the fact
that they return two results, not one, so the immediate offset will be
the 4th operand, not the 3rd.
Follow-up to r247234.
llvm-svn: 247236
This sort-of deprecates macho-dump. It may take still a little while
to garbage collect it, but at least there's no real usage of it in
the tree anymore. New tests should always rely on llvm-readobj or
llvm-objdump.
llvm-svn: 247235
This reapply a variant commit r247179 after post-commit review from
D.Blaikie.
Hopefully I got it right this time: lifetime of initializer list ends
as with any expression, which make invalid the pattern:
ArrayRef<int> Arr = { 1, 2, 3, 4};
Just like StringRef, ArrayRef shouldn't be used to initialize local
variable but only as function argument.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 247233
We could go through the load/store optimizer and match STNP where
we would have matched a nontemporal-annotated STP, but that's not
reliable enough, as an opportunistic optimization.
Insetad, we can guarantee emitting STNP, by matching them at ISel.
Since there are no single-input nontemporal stores, we have to
resort to some high-bits-extracting trickery to generate an STNP
from a plain store.
Also, we need to support another, LDP/STP-specific addressing mode,
base + signed scaled 7-bit immediate offset.
For now, only match the base. Let's make it smart separately.
Part of PR24086.
llvm-svn: 247231
Seems it broke the Polly build.
From http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/builds/11687/steps/compile/logs/stdio:
In file included from /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.src/lib/TableGen/Record.cpp:14:0:
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.src/include/llvm/TableGen/Record.h:369:3: error: looser throw specifier for 'virtual llvm::TypedInit::~TypedInit()'
/home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast/llvm.src/include/llvm/TableGen/Record.h:270:11: error: overriding 'virtual llvm::Init::~Init() noexcept (true)'
llvm-svn: 247222
The assertion was weaker than it should be and gave the impression we're growing the number of base defining values being considered during the fixed point interation. That's not true. The tighter form of the assert is useful documentation.
llvm-svn: 247221
All of the complexity is in cleanupret, and it mostly follows the same
codepaths as catchret, except it doesn't take a return value in RAX.
This small example now compiles and executes successfully on win32:
extern "C" int printf(const char *, ...) noexcept;
struct Dtor {
~Dtor() { printf("~Dtor\n"); }
};
void has_cleanup() {
Dtor o;
throw 42;
}
int main() {
try {
has_cleanup();
} catch (int) {
printf("caught it\n");
}
}
Don't try to put the cleanup in the same function as the catch, or Bad
Things will happen.
llvm-svn: 247219
This reapply commit r247178 after post-commit review from D.Blaikie
in a way that makes it compatible with the existing API.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 247215
The purpose is to allow templated wrapper to work with either
ArrayRef or any convertible operation:
template<typename Container>
void wrapper(const Container &Arr) {
impl(makeArrayRef(Arr));
}
with Container being a std::vector, a SmallVector, or an ArrayRef.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 247214
This change is simply enhancing the existing inference algorithm to handle insertelement instructions by conservatively inserting a new instruction to propagate the vector of associated base pointers. In the process, I'm ripping out the peephole optimizations which mostly helped cover the fact this hadn't been done.
Note that most of the newly inserted nodes will be nearly immediately removed by the post insertion optimization pass introduced in 246718. Arguably, we should be trying harder to avoid the malloc traffic here, but I'd rather get the code correct, then worry about compile time.
Unlike previous extensions of the algorithm to handle more case, I discovered the existing code was causing miscompiles in some cases. In particular, we had an implicit assumption that the peephole covered *all* insert element instructions, so if we had a value directly based on a insert element the peephole didn't cover, we proceeded as if it were a base anyways. Not good. I believe we had the same issue with shufflevector which is why I adjusted the predicate for them as well.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12583
llvm-svn: 247210
Previously, the base pointer algorithm wasn't deterministic. The core fixed point was (of course), but we were inserting new nodes and optimizing them in an order which was unspecified and variable. We'd somewhat hacked around this for testing by sorting by value name, but that doesn't solve the general determinism problem.
Instead, we can use the order of traversal over the def/use graph to give us a single consistent ordering. Today, this is a DFS order, but the exact order doesn't mater provided it's deterministic for a given input.
(Q: It is safe to rely on a deterministic order of operands right?)
Note that this only fixes the determinism within a single inference step. The inference step is currently invoked many times in a non-deterministic order. That's a future change in the sequence. :)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12640
llvm-svn: 247208
Alexey Bataev