llvm rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_push_object_address.This DWARF
operator is needed for Flang to support allocatable array.
Summary:
Currently llvm rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_push_object_address.
below error is produced when llvm finds this operator.
[..]
invalid expression
!DIExpression(151)
warning: ignoring invalid debug info in pushobj.ll
[..]
There are some parts missing in support of this operator, need to
be completed.
Testing
-added a unit testcase
-check-debuginfo
-check-llvm
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79306
This patch extends DIModule Debug metadata in LLVM to support
Fortran modules. DIModule is extended to contain File and Line
fields, these fields will be used by Flang FE to create debug
information necessary for representing Fortran modules at IR level.
Furthermore DW_TAG_module is also extended to contain these fields.
If these fields are missing, debuggers like GDB won't be able to
show Fortran modules information correctly.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79484
The current strategy LICM uses when sinking for debuginfo is
that of picking the debug location of one of the uses.
This causes stepping to be wrong sometimes, see, e.g. PR45523.
This patch introduces a generalization of getMergedLocation(),
that operates on a vector of locations instead of two, and try
to merge all them together, and use the new API in LICM.
<rdar://problem/61750950>
When compiling
```
struct S {
float w;
};
void f(long w, long b);
void g(struct S s) {
int w = s.w;
f(w, w*4);
}
```
I get Assertion failed: ((!CombinedExpr || CombinedExpr->isValid()) && "Combined debug expression is invalid").
That's because we combine two epxressions that both end in DW_OP_stack_value:
```
(lldb) p Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p Param.Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 4, DW_OP_mul, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->isValid()
(bool) $0 = false
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->dump()
!DIExpression(4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 16, 4, 30, 4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 159, 159)
```
I believe that in this particular case combining two stack values is
safe, but I didn't want to sink the special handling into
DIExpression::append() because I do want everyone to think about what
they are doing.
Patch by Adrian Prantl.
Fixes PR45181.
rdar://problem/60383095
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76164
LLVM currently supports CSK_MD5 and CSK_SHA1 source file checksums in
debug info. This change adds support for CSK_SHA256 checksums.
The SHA256 checksums are supported by the CodeView debug format.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75785
In order for dsymutil to collect .apinotes files (which capture
attributes such as nullability, Swift import names, and availability),
I want to propose adding an apinotes: field to DIModule that gets
translated into a DW_AT_LLVM_apinotes (path) nested inside
DW_TAG_module. This will be primarily used by LLDB to indirectly
extract the Swift names of Clang declarations that were deserialized
from DWARF.
<rdar://problem/59514626>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75585
This is part of PR44213 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
When importing (system) Clang modules, LLDB needs to know which SDK
(e.g., MacOSX, iPhoneSimulator, ...) they came from. While the sysroot
attribute contains the absolute path to the SDK, this doesn't work
well when the debugger is run on a different machine than the
compiler, and the SDKs are installed in different directories. It thus
makes sense to just store the name of the SDK instead of the absolute
path, so it can be found relative to LLDB.
rdar://problem/51645582
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75646
Previously we would also accept DISubprograms that matched in name
only, but this doesn't appear to be necessary any more.
I did a Full and Thin LTO build of Clang and it completed without a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75213
in C++ templates."
This was reverted in 802b22b5c8 due to
missing .bc file and a chromium bot failure.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1057559#c1
This revision address both of them.
Summary:
This patch adds support for debuginfo generation for defaulted
parameters in clang and also extends corresponding DebugMetadata/IR to support this feature.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73462
The Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll test is failing:
FAIL: LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll (5894 of 36324)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/out/gn/bin/llvm-dis -o - /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll.bc | /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/out/gn/bin/FileCheck /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll
--
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stderr):
--
It looks like the Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll.bc file was never checked in.
This reverts commit c2b437d53d.
in C++ templates.
Summary:
This patch adds support for debuginfo generation for defaulted
parameters in clang and also extends corresponding DebugMetadata/IR to support this feature.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73462
[this re-applies c0176916a4
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e5.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
The DebugVariable class is a class declared in LiveDebugValues.cpp which
is used to uniquely identify a single variable, using its source
variable, inline location, and fragment info to do so. This patch moves
this class into DebugInfoMetadata.h, making it available in a much
broader scope.
DIExpressions with shift operators should not be fragmented for the same
reason as arithmetic operators: carry over cannot be expressed from one
fragment to the other, so an invalid result would be produced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70601
Summary:
Also, replace the SmallVector with a normal C array.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70498
DIExpression::isImplicit() did not handle DW_OP_LLVM_fragment
correctly. It was scanning the elements in the expression by
iterating from the end. But we do not know the position of
ops unless we iterate from the beginning of the expression,
since DW_OP:s and their operands are stored flat in the expression
list. The old code also assumed that a DW_OP_LLVM_fragment
only occupied one element in the expression list, but it actually
occupies three elements.
Summary:
Internally in LLVM's metadata we use DW_OP_entry_value operations with
the same semantics as DWARF; that is, its operand specifies the number
of bytes that the entry value covers.
At the time of emitting entry values we don't know the emitted size of
the DWARF expression that the entry value will cover. Currently the size
is hardcoded to 1 in DIExpression, and other values causes the verifier
to fail. As the size is 1, that effectively means that we can only have
valid entry values for registers that can be encoded in one byte, which
are the registers with DWARF numbers 0 to 31 (as they can be encoded as
single-byte DW_OP_reg0..DW_OP_reg31 rather than a multi-byte
DW_OP_regx). It is a bit confusing, but it seems like llvm-dwarfdump
will print an operation "correctly", even if the byte size is less than
that, which may make it seem that we emit correct DWARF for registers
with DWARF numbers > 31. If you instead use readelf for such cases, it
will interpret the number of specified bytes as a DWARF expression. This
seems like a limitation in llvm-dwarfdump.
As suggested in D66746, a way forward would be to add an internal
variant of DW_OP_entry_value, DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value, whose operand
instead specifies the number of operations that the entry value covers,
and we then translate that into the byte size at the time of emission.
In this patch that internal operation is added. This patch keeps the
limitation that a entry value can only be applied to simple register
locations, but it will fix the issue with the size operand being
incorrect for DWARF numbers > 31.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67492
llvm-svn: 374881
Dump the DWARF information about call sites and call site parameters into
debug info sections.
The patch also provides an interface for the interpretation of instructions
that could load values of a call site parameters in order to generate DWARF
about the call site parameters.
([13/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60716
llvm-svn: 365467
This patch addresses PR41675, where a stack-pointer variable is dereferenced
too many times by its location expression, presenting a value on the stack as
the pointer to the stack.
The difference between a stack *pointer* DBG_VALUE and one that refers to a
value on the stack, is currently the indirect flag. However the DWARF backend
will also try to guess whether something is a memory location or not, based
on whether there is any computation in the location expression. By simply
prepending the stack offset to existing expressions, we can accidentally
convert a register location into a memory location, which introduces a
suprise (and unintended) dereference.
The solution is to add DW_OP_stack_value whenever we add a DIExpression
computation to a stack *pointer*. It's an implicit location computed on the
expression stack, thus needs to be flagged as a stack_value.
For the edge case where the offset is zero and the location could be a register
location, DIExpression::prepend will still generate opcodes, and thus
DW_OP_stack_value must still be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63429
llvm-svn: 364736
Add the IR and the AsmPrinter parts for handling of the DW_OP_entry_values
DWARF operation.
([11/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60866
llvm-svn: 364542
The goal is to improve hwasan's error reporting for stack use-after-return by
recording enough information to allow the specific variable that was accessed
to be identified based on the pointer's tag. Currently we record the PC and
lower bits of SP for each stack frame we create (which will eventually be
enough to derive the base tag used by the stack frame) but that's not enough
to determine the specific tag for each variable, which is the stack frame's
base tag XOR a value (the "tag offset") that is unique for each variable in
a function.
In IR, the tag offset is most naturally represented as part of a location
expression on the llvm.dbg.declare instruction. However, the presence of the
tag offset in the variable's actual location expression is likely to confuse
debuggers which won't know about tag offsets, and moreover the tag offset
is not required for a debugger to determine the location of the variable on
the stack, so at the DWARF level it is represented as an attribute so that
it will be ignored by debuggers that don't know about it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63119
llvm-svn: 363635
Refactor DIExpression::With* into a flag enum in order to be less
error-prone to use (as discussed on D60866).
Patch by Djordje Todorovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61943
llvm-svn: 361137
TypedDINodeRef<T> is a redundant wrapper of Metadata * that is actually a T *.
Accordingly, change DI{Node,Scope,Type}Ref uses to DI{Node,Scope,Type} * or their const variants.
This allows us to delete many resolve() calls that clutter the code.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61369
llvm-svn: 360108
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
This re-commit fixes issues reported in the first one. Namely deref was
inserted under wrong conditions and additionally the deref_size argument
was incorrectly encoded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 359535
It causes clang to crash while building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/952230
for reproducer.
> The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
> prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
> expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
> address instead of the value behind it.
>
> The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
> big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
> larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
> address).
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358281
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358268
COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example.
COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J
For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block.
@alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33!14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…)
!20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha")
!25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24)
!27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression())
!29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28)
!30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression())
!31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28)
!32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4)
!33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32)
The DWARF generated for this is as follows.
DW_TAG_common_block:
DW_AT_name: alpha
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: common alpha
DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: i
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: j
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4
Patch by Eric Schweitz!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327
llvm-svn: 357934
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
This is a recommit of r356442 with trivial fixes for the failing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356451
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356442
Summary:
According to
https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/archive/10.0/ptx-writers-guide-to-interoperability/index.html#cuda-specific-dwarf,
the compiler should emit the DW_AT_address_class attribute for all
variable and parameter. It means, that DW_AT_address_class attribute
should be used in the non-standard way to support compatibility with the
cuda-gdb debugger.
Clang is able to generate the information about the variable address
class. This information is emitted as the expression sequence
`DW_OP_constu <DWARF Address Space> DW_OP_swap DW_OP_xderef`. The patch
tries to find all such expressions and transform them into
`DW_AT_address_class <DWARF Address Space>` if target is NVPTX and the debugger is gdb.
If the expression is not found, then default values are used. For the
local variables <DWARF Address Space> is set to ADDR_local_space(6), for
the globals <DWARF Address Space> is set to ADDR_global_space(5). The
values are taken from the table in the same section 5.2. CUDA-Specific
DWARF Definitions.
Reviewers: echristo, probinson
Subscribers: jholewinski, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57157
llvm-svn: 353203
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Added a pair of APIs for encoding/decoding the 3 components of a DWARF discriminator described in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106532.html: the base discriminator, the duplication factor (useful in profile-guided optimization) and the copy index (used to identify copies of code in cases like loop unrolling)
The encoding packs 3 unsigned values in 32 bits. This CL addresses 2 issues:
- communicates overflow back to the user
- supports encoding all 3 components together. Current APIs assume a sequencing of events. For example, creating a new discriminator based on an existing one by changing the base discriminator was not supported.
Reviewers: davidxl, danielcdh, wmi, dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: zzheng, dmgreen, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55681
llvm-svn: 349973
Packing the flags into one bitcode word will save effort in
adding new flags in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54755
llvm-svn: 347806
This will hold flags specific to subprograms. In the future
we could potentially free up scarce bits in DIFlags by moving
subprogram-specific flags from there to the new flags word.
This patch does not change IR/bitcode formats, that will be
done in a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54597
llvm-svn: 347239
Summary:
Ranges base address specifiers can save a lot of object size in
relocation records especially in optimized builds.
For an optimized self-host build of Clang with split DWARF and debug
info compression in object files, but uncompressed debug info in the
executable, this change produces about 18% smaller object files and 6%
larger executable.
While it would've been nice to turn this on by default, gold's 32 bit
gdb-index support crashes on this input & I don't think there's any
perfect heuristic to implement solely in LLVM that would suffice - so
we'll need a flag one way or another (also possible people might want to
aggressively optimized for executable size that contains debug info
(even with compression this would still come at some cost to executable
size)) - so let's plumb it through.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54242
llvm-svn: 346788
Summary:
Some lines have a hit counter where they should not have one.
For example, in C++, some cleanup is adding at the end of a scope represented by a '}'.
So such a line has a hit counter where a user expects to not have one.
The goal of the patch is to add this information in DILocation which is used to get the covered lines in GCOVProfiling.cpp.
A following patch in clang will add this information when generating IR (https://reviews.llvm.org/D49916).
Reviewers: marco-c, davidxl, vsk, javed.absar, rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, xur, danielcdh, aprantl, rnk, dblaikie, #debug-info, vsk, llvm-commits, sylvestre.ledru
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49915
llvm-svn: 342631
The function's new implementation from r340583 had a bug in it that
could cause an invalid scope to be generated when merging two
DILocations with no common ancestor scope.
This patch detects this situation and picks the scope of the first
location. This is not perfect, because the scope is misleading, but on
the other hand, this will be a line 0 location.
rdar://problem/43687474
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51238
llvm-svn: 340672
Alok Kumar Sharma