way that C does. Among other differences, elaborated type specifiers
are defined to skip "non-types", which, as you might imagine, does not
include typedefs. Rework our use of IDNS masks to capture the semantics
of different kinds of declarations better, and remove most current lookup
filters. Removing the last remaining filter is more complicated and will
happen in a separate patch.
Fixes PR 6885 as well some spectrum of unfiled bugs.
llvm-svn: 102164
address of overloaded function, instead of assuming that a nested name
specifier was used. A nested name specifier is not required for static
functions.
Fixes PR6886.
llvm-svn: 102107
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
llvm-svn: 102038
resolution ([over.ics.ref]), we take some shortcuts required by the
standard that effectively permit binding of a const volatile reference
to an rvalue. We have to treat lightly here to avoid infinite
recursion.
Fixes PR6177.
llvm-svn: 101712
temporary object. This is blindingly obvious from reading C++
[over.match.ctor]p1, but somehow I'd missed it and it took DR152 to
educate me. Adjust one test that was relying on this non-standard
behavior.
llvm-svn: 101688
resolution. There are two sources of problems involving user-defined
conversions that this change eliminates, along with providing simpler
interfaces for checking implicit conversions:
- It eliminates a case of infinite recursion found in Boost.
- It eliminates the search for the constructor needed to copy a temporary
generated by an implicit conversion from overload
resolution. Overload resolution assumes that, if it gets a value
of the parameter's class type (or a derived class thereof), there
is a way to copy if... even if there isn't. We now model this
properly.
llvm-svn: 101680
intended for redeclarations, fixing those that need it. Fixes PR6831.
This uncovered an issue where the C++ type-specifier-seq parsing logic
would try to perform name lookup on an identifier after it already had
a type-specifier, which could also lead to spurious ambiguity errors
(as in PR6831, but with a different test case).
llvm-svn: 101419
ASTContext::getTypeSize() rather than ASTContext::getIntWidth() for
the width of an integral type. The former includes padding for bools
(to the target's size) while the latter does not, so we woud end up
zero-extending bools to the target width when we shouldn't. Fixes a
crash-on-valid in the included test.
llvm-svn: 101372
that have reference or const scalar members, since those members can
never be initializer or modified. Fixes <rdar://problem/7804350>.
llvm-svn: 101316
ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction when asked to complain. Previously,
we had some weird handshake where ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction
expected its caller to handle some of the diagnostics but not others,
and yet there was no way for the caller to know which case we were
in. Eliminate this madness, fixing <rdar://problem/7765884>.
llvm-svn: 101312
separate count of "suppressed" errors. This way, semantic analysis
bits that depend on the error count to determine whether problems
occured (e.g., some template argument deduction failures, jump-scope
checking) will not get confused.
The actual problem here is that a missing #include (which is a fatal
error) could cause the jump-scope checker to run on invalid code,
which it is not prepared to do. Trivial fix for both
<rdar://problem/7775941> and <rdar://problem/7775709>.
llvm-svn: 101297
that adds parentheses from the main diagnostic down to a new
note. This way, when the fix-it represents a choice between two
options, each of the options is associted with a note. There is no
default option in such cases. For example:
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: warning: & has lower precedence than ==; ==
will be
evaluated first [-Wparentheses]
if (x & y == 0) {
^~~~~~~~
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: note: place parentheses around the &
expression to
evaluate it first
if (x & y == 0) {
^
( )
/Users/dgregor/t.c:2:9: note: place parentheses around the ==
expression to
silence this warning
if (x & y == 0) {
^
( )
llvm-svn: 101249
copying the type location information from the conversion-type-id into
the type location information for the function type. Do something
similar for constructors and destructors, by giving their "void"
return type source-location information.
In all of these cases, we previously left this type-source information
uninitialized, which led to various unfortunate crashes.
We still aren't tracking good source-location information for the
actual names. That's PR6357.
John, please check my sanity on this.
llvm-svn: 101088
sure to introduce them into the current Scope (when we have one) in
addition to the DeclContext for the class, so that they can be found
by name lookup for inline members of the class. Fixes PR6570.
llvm-svn: 101047
member. Use a better diagnostic for this case. Also fix a bug with nested
anonymous structs/unions for -Wreorder; this last was PR6575.
llvm-svn: 100923
when they're instantiated. Merge the note into the -Wreorder warning; it
doesn't really contribute much, and it was splitting a thought across diagnostics
anyway. Don't crash in the parser when a constructor's initializers end in a
comma and there's no body; the recovery here is still terrible, but anything's
better than a crash.
llvm-svn: 100922
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
the implicit template instantiations we need to perform. Otherwise, we
end up erroneously diagnosing static functions as used if they were
only used within an implicit template instantiation. Fixes a bunch of
spurious failures when building Clang with Clang.
llvm-svn: 100872
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
<tr1/hashtable> header, where a friend class template
std::tr1::__detail::_Map_base is declared with the wrong template
parameters. GCC doesn't catch the problem, so Clang does a little
back-flip to avoid diagnosing just this one instance of the problem.
llvm-svn: 100790
poor (and wrong) approximation of the actual rules governing when to
build a copy and when it can be elided.
The correct implementation is actually simpler than the
approximation. When we only enumerate constructors as part of
initialization (e.g., for direct initialization or when we're copying
from a class type or one of its derived classes), we don't create a
copy. When we enumerate all conversion functions, we do create a
copy. Before, we created some extra copies and missed some
others. The new test copy-initialization.cpp shows a case where we
missed creating a (required, non-elidable) copy as part of a
user-defined conversion, which resulted in a miscompile. This commit
also fixes PR6757, where the missing copy made us reject well-formed
code in the ternary operator.
This commit also cleans up our handling of copy elision in the case
where we create an extra copy of a temporary object, which became
necessary now that we produce the right copies. The code that seeks to
find the temporary object being copied has moved into
Expr::getTemporaryObject(); it used to have two different
not-quite-the-same implementations, one in Sema and one in CodeGen.
Note that we still do not attempt to perform the named return value
optimization, so we miss copy elisions for return values and throw
expressions.
llvm-svn: 100196
nested-name-specifier (e.g., "class T::foo") fails to find a tag
member in the scope nominated by the
nested-name-specifier. Previously, we gave a bland
error: 'Nested' does not name a tag member in the specified scope
which didn't actually say where we were looking, which was rather
horrible when the nested-name-specifier was instantiated. Now, we give
something a bit better:
error: no class named 'Nested' in 'NoDepBase<T>'
llvm-svn: 100060
John McCall