Selecting 32-bit element logical ops without a select or broadcast requires matching a bitconvert on the inputs to the and. But that's a weird thing to rely on. It's entirely possible that one of the inputs doesn't have a bitcast and one does.
Since there's no functional difference, just remove the extra patterns and save some isel table size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36854
llvm-svn: 312138
Summary:
When broadcasting from the constant pool its useful to print out the final vector similar to what we do for normal moves from the constant pool.
I changed only a couple tests that were broadcast focused. One of them had been previously hand tweaked after running the script so that it could check the constant pool declaration. But I think this patch makes that unnecessary now since we can check the comment instead.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34923
llvm-svn: 307062
Since r288804, we try to lower build_vectors on AVX using broadcasts of
float/double. However, when we broadcast integer values that happen to
have a NaN float bitpattern, we lose the NaN payload, thereby changing
the integer value being broadcast.
This is caused by ConstantFP::get, to which we pass the splat i32 as
a float (by bitcasting it using bitsToFloat). ConstantFP::get takes
a double parameter, so we end up lossily converting a single-precision
NaN to double-precision.
Instead, avoid any kinds of conversions by directly building an APFloat
from the splatted APInt.
Note that this also fixes another piece of code (broadcast of
subvectors), that currently isn't susceptible to the same problem.
Also note that we could really just use APInt and ConstantInt
throughout: the constant pool type doesn't matter much. Still, for
consistency, use the appropriate type.
llvm-svn: 304590
Check if a build_vector node includes a repeated constant pattern and replace it with a broadcast of that pattern.
For example:
"build_vector <0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3>" would be replaced by "broadcast <0, 1, 2, 3>"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26802
llvm-svn: 288804
Craig Topper