Add `__c11_atomic_fetch_nand` builtin to language extensions and support `__atomic_fetch_nand` libcall in compiler-rt.
Reviewed By: theraven
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112400
When compiled with -ffreestanding, we should not assume that headers
declaring functions such as abort() are available. While the compiler may
still emit calls to those functions [1], we should not require the headers
to build compiler-rt since that can result in a cyclic dependency graph:
The compiler-rt functions might be required to build libc.so, but the libc
headers such as stdlib.h might only be available once libc has been built.
[1] From https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Standards.html:
GCC requires the freestanding environment provide memcpy, memmove,
memset and memcmp. Finally, if __builtin_trap is used, and the target
does not implement the trap pattern, then GCC emits a call to abort.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103876
This function is called by the __atomic_is_lock_free() builtin if the value
cannot be resolved to true at compile time. Lack of this function is
causing the non-lockfree atomics tests in libc++ to not be run (see D91911)
This function is also added in D85044, but that review also adds support
for using lock-free atomics in more cases, whereas this is a minimal change
that just adds __atomic_is_lock_free() for the implementation of atomic.c.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92302
The code currently uses __c11_atomic_is_lock_free() to detect whether an
atomic operation is natively supported. However, this can result in a
runtime function call to determine whether the given operation is lock-free
and clang generating a call to e.g. __atomic_load_8 since the branch is
not a constant zero. Since we are implementing those runtime functions, we
must avoid those calls. This patch replaces __c11_atomic_is_lock_free()
with __atomic_always_lock_free() which always results in a compile-time
constant value. This problem was found while compiling atomic.c for MIPS32
since the -Watomic-alignment warning was being triggered and objdump showed
an undefined reference to _atomic_is_lock_free.
In addition to fixing 32-bit platforms this also enables the 16-byte case
that was disabled in r153779 (185f2edd70).
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86510
Summary:
Synchronize the function definition with the LLVM documentation.
https://llvm.org/docs/Atomics.html#libcalls-atomic
GCC also returns bool for the same atomic builtin.
Reviewers: theraven
Reviewed By: theraven
Subscribers: theraven, dberris, jfb, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79845
Use the uniform single line C++/99 style for code comments.
This is part of the cleanup proposed in "[RFC] compiler-rt builtins
cleanup and refactoring".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60352
llvm-svn: 359411
Update formatting to use the LLVM style.
This is part of the cleanup proposed in "[RFC] compiler-rt builtins
cleanup and refactoring".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60351
llvm-svn: 359410
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
__inline is a vendor specific spelling for inline. clang and gcc treat it the
same as inline, and is available in MSVC 2013 which does not implement C99
(VS2015 supports the inline keyword though). This will allow us to build the
builtins using MSVC.
llvm-svn: 249953
clang does not like the definition of builtins. In order to work around this,
we use a SUN CC to redefine the generated name. However, this requires that we
account for the user label prefix. Rather than hard coding that into the file,
rely on the compiler to tell us the information and use the preprocessor to
generate the name as we do in the assembly routines. NFC.
llvm-svn: 224597
Kai Luo