Code in getRoot made the assumption that every node in PendingLoads
must always itself have a dependency on the current DAG root node.
After the changes in 04a8696, it turns out that this assumption no
longer holds true, causing wrong codegen in some cases (e.g. stores
after constrained FP intrinsics might get deleted).
To fix this, we now need to make sure that the TokenFactor created
by getRoot always includes the previous root, if there is no implicit
dependency already present.
The original getControlRoot code already has exactly this check,
so this patch simply reuses that code now for getRoot as well.
This fixes the regression.
NFC if no constrained FP intrinsic is present.
We need to ensure that fpexcept.strict nodes are not optimized away even if
the result is unused. To do that, we need to chain them into the block's
terminator nodes, like already done for PendingExcepts.
This patch adds two new lists of pending chains, PendingConstrainedFP and
PendingConstrainedFPStrict to hold constrained FP intrinsic nodes without
and with fpexcept.strict markers. This allows not only to solve the above
problem, but also to relax chains a bit further by no longer flushing all
FP nodes before a store or other memory access. (They are still flushed
before nodes with other side effects.)
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72341
A set of function attributes is required in any function that uses constrained
floating point intrinsics. None of our tests use these attributes.
This patch fixes this.
These tests have been tested against the IR verifier changes in D68233.
Reviewed by: andrew.w.kaylor, cameron.mcinally, uweigand
Approved by: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67925
llvm-svn: 373761
Reimplement scheduling constraints for strict FP instructions in
ScheduleDAGInstrs::buildSchedGraph to allow for more relaxed
scheduling. Specifially, allow one strict FP instruction to
be scheduled across another, as long as it is not moved across
any global barrier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64412
Reviewed By: cameron.mcinally
llvm-svn: 366222
The ISD::STRICT_ nodes used to implement the constrained floating-point
intrinsics are currently never passed to the target back-end, which makes
it impossible to handle them correctly (e.g. mark instructions are depending
on a floating-point status and control register, or mark instructions as
possibly trapping).
This patch allows the target to use setOperationAction to switch the action
on ISD::STRICT_ nodes to Legal. If this is done, the SelectionDAG common code
will stop converting the STRICT nodes to regular floating-point nodes, but
instead pass the STRICT nodes to the target using normal SelectionDAG
matching rules.
To avoid having the back-end duplicate all the floating-point instruction
patterns to handle both strict and non-strict variants, we make the MI
codegen explicitly aware of the floating-point exceptions by introducing
two new concepts:
- A new MCID flag "mayRaiseFPException" that the target should set on any
instruction that possibly can raise FP exception according to the
architecture definition.
- A new MI flag FPExcept that CodeGen/SelectionDAG will set on any MI
instruction resulting from expansion of any constrained FP intrinsic.
Any MI instruction that is *both* marked as mayRaiseFPException *and*
FPExcept then needs to be considered as raising exceptions by MI-level
codegen (e.g. scheduling).
Setting those two new flags is straightforward. The mayRaiseFPException
flag is simply set via TableGen by marking all relevant instruction
patterns in the .td files.
The FPExcept flag is set in SDNodeFlags when creating the STRICT_ nodes
in the SelectionDAG, and gets inherited in the MachineSDNode nodes created
from it during instruction selection. The flag is then transfered to an
MIFlag when creating the MI from the MachineSDNode. This is handled just
like fast-math flags like no-nans are handled today.
This patch includes both common code changes required to implement the
new features, and the SystemZ implementation.
Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55506
llvm-svn: 362663
Ulrich Weigand