Add a new driver level flag `-fcf-runtime-abi=` that allows one to specify the
runtime ABI for CoreFoundation. This controls the language interoperability.
In particular, this is relevant for generating the CFConstantString classes
(primarily through the `__builtin___CFStringMakeConstantString` builtin) which
construct a reference to the "CFObject"'s `isa` field. This type differs
between swift 4.1 and 4.2+.
Valid values for the new option include:
- objc [default behaviour] - enable ObjectiveC interoperability
- swift-4.1 - enable interoperability with swift 4.1
- swift-4.2 - enable interoperability with swift 4.2
- swift-5.0 - enable interoperability with swift 5.0
- swift [alias] - target the latest swift ABI
Furthermore, swift 4.2+ changed the layout for the CFString when building
CoreFoundation *without* ObjectiveC interoperability. In such a case, a field
was added to the CFObject base type changing it from: <{ const int*, int }> to
<{ uintptr_t, uintptr_t, uint64_t }>.
In swift 5.0, the CFString type will be further adjusted to change the length
from a uint32_t on everything but BE LP64 targets to uint64_t.
Note that the default behaviour for clang remains unchanged and the new layout
must be explicitly opted into via `-fcf-runtime-abi=swift*`.
llvm-svn: 345222
Summary:
Changing the node type in lowering was violating assumptions made in
the DAG combiner, so don't change the node type any more. This fixes
one of the issues reported in bug 39275.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits, alexcrichton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53537
llvm-svn: 345221
Instead of using the MOVGOT64r pseudo, use the existing
MO_PIC_BASE_OFFSET support on symbol operands. Now I don't have to
create a "scratch register operand" for the pseudo to use, and the
register allocator can make better decisions.
Fixes some X86 verifier errors tracked in PR27481.
llvm-svn: 345219
Summary:
Changes all uses of minnan/maxnan to minimum/maximum
globally. These names emphasize that the semantic difference between
these operations is more than just NaN-propagation.
Reviewers: arsenm, aheejin, dschuff, javed.absar
Subscribers: jholewinski, sdardis, wdng, sbc100, jgravelle-google, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53112
llvm-svn: 345218
In this diff we introduce dispatch mechanism based on
the type of the input (archive, object file, raw binary)
and the format (coff, elf, macho).
We also move the ELF-specific code into the namespace llvm::objcopy::elf.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53311
llvm-svn: 345217
Summary:
C++14 sized deallocation is disabled by default due to ABI concerns. However, when a user manually enables it then libc++ should take advantage of it since sized deallocation can provide a significant performance win depending on the underlying malloc implementation. (Note that libc++'s definitions of sized delete don't do anything special yet, but users are free to provide their own).
This patch updates __libcpp_deallocate to selectively call sized operator delete when it's available. `__libcpp_deallocate_unsized` should be used when the size of the allocation is unknown.
On Apple this patch makes no attempt to determine if the sized operator delete is unavailable, only that the language feature is enabled. This could cause a compile error when using `std::allocator`, but the same compile error would occur whenever the user calls `new`, so I don't think it's a problem.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: rsmith, ckennelly, libcxx-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53120
llvm-svn: 345214
'ignore-non-existent-contents' stopped working after r342232 in a way
that the actual attribute value isn't used and it works as if it is
always `true`.
Common use case for VFS iteration is iterating through files in umbrella
directories for modules. Ability to detect if some VFS entries point to
non-existing files is nice but non-critical. Instead of adding back
support for `'ignore-non-existent-contents': false` I am removing the
attribute, because such scenario isn't used widely enough and stricter
checks don't provide enough value to justify the maintenance.
Change is done both in LLVM and Clang, corresponding Clang commit is r345212.
rdar://problem/45176119
Reviewers: bruno
Reviewed By: bruno
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, sammccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53228
llvm-svn: 345213
'ignore-non-existent-contents' stopped working after r342232 in a way
that the actual attribute value isn't used and it works as if it is
always `true`.
Common use case for VFS iteration is iterating through files in umbrella
directories for modules. Ability to detect if some VFS entries point to
non-existing files is nice but non-critical. Instead of adding back
support for `'ignore-non-existent-contents': false` I am removing the
attribute, because such scenario isn't used widely enough and stricter
checks don't provide enough value to justify the maintenance.
rdar://problem/45176119
Reviewers: bruno
Reviewed By: bruno
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, sammccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53228
llvm-svn: 345212
Summary:
When -faligned-allocation is specified in C++03 libc++ defines std::align_val_t as an unscoped enumeration type (because Clang didn't provide scoped enumerations as an extension until 8.0).
Unfortunately Clang confuses the `align_val_t` overloads of delete with the sized deallocation overloads which aren't enabled. This caused Clang to call the aligned deallocation function as if it were the sized deallocation overload.
For example: https://godbolt.org/z/xXJELh
This patch fixes the confusion.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53508
llvm-svn: 345211
The current splitting algorithm works in three stages:
1) Identify cold blocks, then
2) Use forward/backward propagation to mark hot blocks, then
3) Grow a SESE region of blocks *outside* of the set of hot blocks and
start outlining.
While testing this pass on Apple internal frameworks I noticed that some
kinds of control flow (e.g. loops) are never outlined, even though they
unconditionally lead to / follow cold blocks. I noticed two other issues
related to how cold regions are identified:
- An inconsistency can arise in the internal state of the hotness
propagation stage, as a block may end up in both the ColdBlocks set
and the HotBlocks set. Further inconsistencies can arise as these sets
do not match what's in ProfileSummaryInfo.
- It isn't necessary to limit outlining to single-exit regions.
This patch teaches the splitting algorithm to identify maximal cold
regions and outline them. A maximal cold region is defined as the set of
blocks post-dominated by a cold sink block, or dominated by that sink
block. This approach can successfully outline loops in the cold path. As
a side benefit, it maintains less internal state than the current
approach.
Due to a limitation in CodeExtractor, blocks within the maximal cold
region which aren't dominated by a single entry point (a so-called "max
ancestor") are filtered out.
Results:
- X86 (LNT + -Os + externals): 134KB of TEXT were outlined compared to
47KB pre-patch, or a ~3x improvement. Did not see a performance impact
across two runs.
- AArch64 (LNT + -Os + externals + Apple-internal benchmarks): 149KB
of TEXT were outlined. Ditto re: performance impact.
- Outlining results improve marginally in the internal frameworks I
tested.
Follow-ups:
- Outline more than once per function, outline large single basic
blocks, & try to remove unconditional branches in outlined functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53627
llvm-svn: 345209
The -force option allows you to pass an empty value to settings set to
reset the value to its default. This means that the following operations
are equivalent:
settings set -f <setting>
settings clear <setting>
The motivation for this change is the ability to export and import
settings from LLDB. Because of the way the dumpers work, we don't know
whether a value is going to be the default or not. Hence we cannot use
settings clear and use settings set -f, potentially providing an empty
value.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52772
llvm-svn: 345207
(Relands r344930, reverted in r344935, and now hopefully fixed for
Windows.)
While this change specifically targets FileCheck, it affects any tool
using the same SourceMgr facilities.
Previously, -color was documented in FileCheck's -help output, but
-color had no effect. Now, -color obeys its documentation: it forces
colors to be used in FileCheck diagnostics even when stderr is not a
terminal.
-color is especially helpful when combined with FileCheck's -v, which
can produce a long series of diagnostics that you might wish to pipe
to a pager, such as less -R. The WithColor extensions here will also
help to clean up color usage in FileCheck's annotated dump of input,
which is proposed in D52999.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53419
llvm-svn: 345202
Until now, we've only checked whether merging stores would cause a cycle via
the value argument, but the address and indexed offset arguments are also
capable of creating cycles in some situations.
The addresses are all base+offset with notionally the same base, but the base
SDNode may still be different (e.g. via an indexed load in one case, and an
ISD::ADD elsewhere). This allows cycles to creep in if one of these sources
depends on another.
The indexed offset is usually undef (representing a non-indexed store), but on
some architectures (e.g. 32-bit ARM-mode ARM) it can be an arbitrary value,
again allowing dependency cycles to creep in.
llvm-svn: 345200
This reverts commits r333103 and r333108. _Float16 and __fp16 are C11
extensions and compilers other than Clang don't define these for C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53670
llvm-svn: 345199
It's possible to do a tail call to a stack argument. LLVM already
calculates the right stack offset to call through.
Fixes the sibcall* and musttail* verifier failures tracked at PR27481.
llvm-svn: 345197
Summary: This will make it possible to add non-exclusive mode output.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53501
llvm-svn: 345194
Summary: Future development can then dump other content than AST.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53500
llvm-svn: 345193
Summary:
This will make it possible to easily
* Add new commands which accept <feature> parameters
* Extend the list of features
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53498
llvm-svn: 345192
Summary:
This renames the IsParsingMSInlineAsm member variable of AsmLexer to
LexMasmIntegers and moves it up to MCAsmLexer. This is the only behavior
controlled by that variable. I added a public setter, so that it can be
set from outside or from the llvm-mc command line. We may need to
arrange things so that users can get this behavior from clang, but
that's future work.
I also put additional hex literal lexing functionality under this flag
to fix PR32973. It appears that this hex literal parsing wasn't intended
to be enabled in non-masm-style blocks.
Now, masm integers (0b1101 and 0ABCh) work in __asm blocks from clang,
but 0b label references work when using .intel_syntax in standalone .s
files.
However, 0b label references will *not* work from __asm blocks in clang.
They will work from GCC inline asm blocks, which it sounds like is
important for Crypto++ as mentioned in PR36144.
Essentially, we only lex masm literals for inline asm blobs that use
intel syntax. If the .intel_syntax directive is used inside a gnu-style
inline asm statement, masm literals will not be lexed, which is
compatible with gas and llvm-mc standalone .s assembly.
This fixes PR36144 and PR32973.
Reviewers: Gerolf, avt77
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53535
llvm-svn: 345189
I'm not sure all the microarchitectural tuning flags that have been added to IVBFeatures are relevant for KNL. Separating will allow us to see and audit them. There might even be some simplification opportunities in the Sandy Bridge through Icelake inheritance line without KNL using the same chain.
llvm-svn: 345183
Add X86 SimplifyDemandedBitsForTargetNode and use it to simplify PMULDQ/PMULUDQ target nodes.
This enables us to repeatedly simplify the node's arguments after the previous approach had to be reverted due to PR39398.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53643
llvm-svn: 345182
Summary:
For the following code:
```
int i;
#pragma omp taskloop
for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
{}
#pragma omp taskloop nogroup
for (i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
{}
```
Clang emits the following LLVM IR:
```
...
call void @__kmpc_taskgroup(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0)
%2 = call i8* @__kmpc_omp_task_alloc(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i32 1, i64 80, i64 8, i32 (i32, i8*)* bitcast (i32 (i32, %struct.kmp_task_t_with_privates*)* @.omp_task_entry. to i32 (i32, i8*)*))
...
call void @__kmpc_taskloop(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i8* %2, i32 1, i64* %8, i64* %9, i64 %13, i32 0, i32 0, i64 0, i8* null)
call void @__kmpc_end_taskgroup(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0)
...
%15 = call i8* @__kmpc_omp_task_alloc(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i32 1, i64 80, i64 8, i32 (i32, i8*)* bitcast (i32 (i32, %struct.kmp_task_t_with_privates.1*)* @.omp_task_entry..2 to i32 (i32, i8*)*))
...
call void @__kmpc_taskloop(%struct.ident_t* @0, i32 %0, i8* %15, i32 1, i64* %21, i64* %22, i64 %26, i32 0, i32 0, i64 0, i8* null)
```
The first set of instructions corresponds to the first taskloop construct. It is important to note that the implicit taskgroup region associated with the taskloop construct has been materialized in our IR: the `__kmpc_taskloop` occurs inside a taskgroup region. Note also that this taskgroup region does not exist in our second taskloop because we are using the `nogroup` clause.
The issue here is the 4th argument of the kmpc_taskloop call, starting from the end, is always a zero. Checking the LLVM OpenMP RT implementation, we see that this argument corresponds to the nogroup parameter:
```
void __kmpc_taskloop(ident_t *loc, int gtid, kmp_task_t *task, int if_val,
kmp_uint64 *lb, kmp_uint64 *ub, kmp_int64 st, int nogroup,
int sched, kmp_uint64 grainsize, void *task_dup);
```
So basically we always tell to the RT to do another taskgroup region. For the first taskloop, this means that we create two taskgroup regions. For the second example, it means that despite the fact we had a nogroup clause we are going to have a taskgroup region, so we unnecessary wait until all descendant tasks have been executed.
Reviewers: ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53636
llvm-svn: 345180
Summary:
The current default of appending "_"+entry block label to the new
extracted cold function breaks demangling. Change the deliminator from
"_" to "." to enable demangling. Because the header block label will
be empty for release compile code, use "extracted" after the "." when
the label is empty.
Additionally, add a mechanism for the client to pass in an alternate
suffix applied after the ".", and have the hot cold split pass use
"cold."+Count, where the Count is currently 1 but can be used to
uniquely number multiple cold functions split out from the same function
with D53588.
Reviewers: sebpop, hiraditya
Subscribers: llvm-commits, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53534
llvm-svn: 345178
The compiler is crashing if we trying to post-capture the fields
implicitly captured inside of the task constructs. Seems, this kind of
processing is not supported and such fields should not be
firstprivatized.
llvm-svn: 345177
There's a TSan startup crash on Linux when used in Swift programs, where MonotonicNanoTime will try to call real_clock_gettime and then jump to NULL because interceptors are not yet initialized. This is on Ubuntu 18.04. Looks like TSan's main Initialize() function is called at a point where __progname is already set, but interceptors aren't yet set up. Let's fix this by checking whether interceptors are initialized in MonotonicNanoTime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53528
llvm-svn: 345174
Saleem Abdulrasool