fshl (or X, Y), X, C ==/!= 0 --> or (shl Y, C), X ==/!= 0
fshl X, (or X, Y), C ==/!= 0 --> or (srl Y, BW-C), X ==/!= 0
This is similar to an existing setcc-of-rotate fold, but the
matching requires more checks for the more general funnel op:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Ab2jDd
We are effectively decomposing the funnel shift into logical
shifts, reassociating, and removing a shift.
This should get us the final improvements for x86-64 that were
originally shown in D111530
( https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49541 );
x86-32 still shows some SHLD/SHRD, so the pattern is not
matching there yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122919
arm64_32 guarantees the high 32 bits of pointer parameters are passed as 0, and
this is modelled in the IR by inserting an AssertZExt after the CopyFromReg.
The function deciding whether registers that need to be preserved actually are
wasn't expecting this so it banned perfectly legitimate tail calls.
This patch aims to overcome an issue in these mappings where, when an ISD
node was registered with BEGIN_REGISTER_VP_SDNODE but outwidth the scope
of a pair of BEGIN_REGISTER_VP_INTRINSIC/END_REGISTER_VP_INTRINSIC
macros, the switch cases fell apart. This in particular happened with
VP_SETCC, where we'd end up with something along the lines of:
case Intrinsic::vp_fcmp:
break;
case Intrinsic::vp_icmp:
break;
ResOpc = ISD::VP_SETCC;
case Intrinsic::vp_store:
...
To remedy this, we introduce a special-purpose mapping macro which can
map any number of VP intrinsic opcodes to an ISD opcode.
As a result, we no longer need to special-case the mapping from vp.icmp
and vp.fcmp to VP_SETCC, as the new helper macro does it for us.
Thanks to @craig.topper for noticing this and to @rogfer01 for the idea.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123324
Rather than rewriting the alloca pointer to zero, use
removePointerBase() to drop the base pointer. This will simply bail
if the base pointer is not the alloca. We could try doing something
more fancy here (like dropping the sources not based on the alloca
on the premise that they aren't SafeStack-relevant), but I don't
think that's worthwhile.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54784.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123309
This patch adds the necessary infrastructure to lower vp.fcmp via
ISD::VP_SETCC to RVV instructions.
Most notably this patch adds cond-code legalization for VP_SETCC,
reusing the existing TargetLowering::LegalizeSetCCCondCode by passing in
additional SDValue parameters for the Mask and EVL. This method then
uses VP operations to legalize the condcode.
There is still a general lack of canonicalization on VP_SETCC as opposed
to SETCC which results in worse code than is theoretically possible.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123051
Currently LowerAtomics exists as a separate pass which blindly
replaces all atomics. Add a new lowering strategy option to eliminate
the atomics which the target can control on a per-instruction level.
Use the same enum as the other atomic instructions for consistency, in
preparation for addition of another strategy.
Introduce a new "Expand" option, since the store expansion does not
use cmpxchg. Alternatively, the existing CmpXChg strategy could be
renamed to Expand.
The VP path was using the split source VTs instead of the split
destination VTs. This may not be a problem today because the VP
nodes going through this have the same source and dest VTs.
It will be a problem when we start using this function for legalizing
VP cast operations.
This patch adds the minimum required to successfully lower vp.icmp via
the new ISD::VP_SETCC node to RVV instructions.
Regular ISD::SETCC goes through a lot of canonicalization which targets
may rely on which has not hereto been ported to VP_SETCC. It also
supports expansion of individual condition codes and a non-boolean
return type. Support for all of that will follow in later patches.
In the case of RVV this largely isn't a problem as the vector integer
comparison instructions are plentiful enough that it can lower all
VP_SETCC nodes on legal integer vectors except for boolean vectors,
which regular SETCC folds away immediately into logical operations.
Floating-point VP_SETCC operations aren't as well supported in RVV and
the backend relies on condition code expansion, so support for those
operations will come in later patches.
Portions of this code were taken from the VP reference patches.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122743
Promotion does not affect the base element type and so the original
index type will remain unchanged. This reflects the behaviour of
DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_MGATHER with no tests affected.
Accord the discussion in D122281, we missing an ISD::AND combine for MLOAD
because it relies on BuildVectorSDNode is fails for scalable vectors.
This patch is intend to handle that, so we can circle back the type MVT::nxv2i32
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122703
E.g. in
```
%i0 = zext <2 x i8> to <2 x i16>
%i1 = bitcast <2 x i16> to <4 x i8>
```
the `%i0`'s zero bits are known to be `0xFF00` (upper half of every element is known zero),
but no elements are known to be zero, and for `%i1`, we don't know anything about zero bits,
but the elements under `0b1010` mask are known to be zero (i.e. the odd elements).
But, we didn't perform such a propagation.
Noticed while investigating more aggressive `vpmaddwd` formation.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123163
Place PersistentId declaration under #if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS to
reduce memory usage when it is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120714
Variable locations now come in two modes, instruction referencing and
DBG_VALUE. At -O0 we pick DBG_VALUE to allow fast construction of variable
information. Unfortunately, SelectionDAG edits the optimisation level in
the presence of opt-bisect-limit, meaning different passes have different
views of what variable location mode we should use. That causes assertions
when they're mixed.
This patch plumbs through a boolean in SelectionDAG from start to
instruction emission, so that we don't rely on the current optimisation
level for correctness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123033
As raised on PR52267, XOR(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE) can be treated as ADD(X,MIN_SIGNED_VALUE), so let these cases use the 'AddLike' folds, similar to how we perform no-common-bits OR(X,Y) cases.
define i8 @src(i8 %x) {
%r = xor i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
=>
define i8 @tgt(i8 %x) {
%r = add i8 %x, 128
ret i8 %r
}
Transformation seems to be correct!
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qV46E2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122754
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/A_auBq
Remove limitation that wouldn't perform the fold if all the inverted bits are known zero
The thumb2 changes look to be benign, although it does show that the TEQ/TST isel patterns could probably be improved.
Fixes movmsk regression in D122754
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123023
Add void casts to mark the variables used, next to the places where
they are used in assert or `LLVM_DEBUG()` expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123117
Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` is better ergonomics for the hashing functions usage, instead of a `StringRef`:
* When returning `StringRef`, client code is "jumping through hoops" to do string manipulations instead of dealing with fixed array of bytes directly, which is more natural
* Returning `std::array<uint8_t, N>` avoids the need for the hasher classes to keep a field just for the purpose of wrapping it and returning it as a `StringRef`
As part of this patch also:
* Introduce `TruncatedBLAKE3` which is useful for using BLAKE3 as the hasher type for `HashBuilder` with non-default hash sizes.
* Make `MD5Result` inherit from `std::array<uint8_t, 16>` which improves & simplifies its API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123100
NFC
When no actual change happens there's no need to notify the
observers about the fact the register class is being constrained.
So we should avoid notifying observers when no change has
happened, because this can dramatically affect compile
time for particular test cases.
Reviewed By: dsanders, arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122615
This pass inserts the necessary CFI instructions to compensate for the
inconsistency of the call-frame information caused by linear (non-CFG
aware) nature of the unwind tables.
Unlike the `CFIInstrInserer` pass, this one almost always emits only
`.cfi_remember_state`/`.cfi_restore_state`, which results in smaller
unwind tables and also transparently handles custom unwind info
extensions like CFA offset adjustement and save locations of SVE
registers.
This pass takes advantage of the constraints that LLVM imposes on the
placement of save/restore points (cf. `ShrinkWrap.cpp`):
* there is a single basic block, containing the function prologue
* possibly multiple epilogue blocks, where each epilogue block is
complete and self-contained, i.e. CSR restore instructions (and the
corresponding CFI instructions are not split across two or more
blocks.
* prologue and epilogue blocks are outside of any loops
Thus, during execution, at the beginning and at the end of each basic
block the function can be in one of two states:
- "has a call frame", if the function has executed the prologue, or
has not executed any epilogue
- "does not have a call frame", if the function has not executed the
prologue, or has executed an epilogue
These properties can be computed for each basic block by a single RPO
traversal.
In order to accommodate backends which do not generate unwind info in
epilogues we compute an additional property "strong no call frame on
entry" which is set for the entry point of the function and for every
block reachable from the entry along a path that does not execute the
prologue. If this property holds, it takes precedence over the "has a
call frame" property.
From the point of view of the unwind tables, the "has/does not have
call frame" state at beginning of each block is determined by the
state at the end of the previous block, in layout order.
Where these states differ, we insert compensating CFI instructions,
which come in two flavours:
- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the
initial one. This is done by a target specific hook and is
expected to be trivial to implement, for example it could be:
```
.cfi_def_cfa <sp>, 0
.cfi_same_value <rN>
.cfi_same_value <rN-1>
...
```
where `<rN>` are the callee-saved registers.
- CFI instructions, which reset the unwind table state to the one
created by the function prologue. These are the sequence:
```
.cfi_restore_state
.cfi_remember_state
```
In this case we also insert a `.cfi_remember_state` after the
last CFI instruction in the function prologue.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, danielkiss, chill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114545
The reason why I am making this change is that before this commit,
EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue relied on a boolean flag IsDbgDeclare both to signal
that a DBG_VALUE should be made to be indirect /and/ that the original intrinsic
was a dbg.declare. This is no longer always true if we add support for handling
dbg.addr since we will have an indirect DBG_VALUE that is a different intrinsic
from dbg.declare.
With that in mind, in this NFC patch, we prepare for future fixes by introducing
a 3 case-enum argument to EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue that allows the caller to
explicitly specify how the argument's DBG_VALUE should be emitted. This then
allows us to turn the indirect checks into a != FuncArgumentDbgValueKind::Value
and prepare us for a future where we add support here for llvm.dbg.addr
directly.
rdar://83957028
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122945
If we expand (uaddo X, 1) we previously expanded the overflow calculation
as (X + 1) <u X. This potentially increases the live range of X and
can prevent X+1 from reusing the register that previously held X.
Since we're adding 1, overflow only occurs if X was UINT_MAX in which
case (X+1) would be 0. So this patch adds a special case to expand
the overflow calculation to (X+1) == 0.
This seems to help with uaddo intrinsics that get introduced by
CodeGenPrepare after LSR. Alternatively, we could block the uaddo
transform in CodeGenPrepare for this case.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122933
D122053 set the ExtendType for ConstantSDNodes in getCopyToRegs to
ZERO_EXTEND to match assumptions in ComputePHILiveOutRegInfo. PHIs
are probably not the only way ConstantSDNodeNodes can get to
getCopyToRegs.
This patch adds an ExtendType parameter to CopyValueToVirtualRegister and
has HandlePHINodesInSuccessorBlocks pass ISD::ZERO_EXTEND for ConstantInts.
This way we only affect ConstantSDNodes for PHIs.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122171
This is an extension of D70965 to avoid creating a mathlib
call where it did not exist in the original source. Also see
D70852 for discussion about an alternative proposal that was
abandoned.
In the motivating bug report:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54554
...we also have a more general issue about handling "no-builtin" options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122610
When shifting by a byte-multiple:
bswap (shl X, C) --> lshr (bswap X), C
bswap (lshr X, C) --> shl (bswap X), C
This is the backend version of D122010 and an alternative
suggested in D120648.
There's an extra check to make sure the shift amount is
valid that was not in the rough draft.
I'm not sure if there is a larger motivating case for RISCV (bug report?),
but the ARM diffs show a benefit from having a late version of the
transform (because we do not combine the loads in IR).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122655
This patch fixes a (seemingly very rare) crash during vector constant
folding introduced in D113300.
Normally, during legalization, if we create an illegally-typed node during
a failed attempt at constant folding it's cleaned up before being
visited, due to it having no uses.
If, however, an illegally-typed node is created during one round of
legalization and isn't cleaned up, it's possible for a second round of
legalization to create new illegally-typed nodes which add extra uses to
the old illegal nodes. This means that we can end up visiting the old
nodes before they're known to be dead, at which point we crash.
I'm not happy about this fix. Creating illegal types at all seems like a
bad idea, but we all-too-often rely on illegal constants being
successfully folded and being fixed up afterwards. However, we can't
rely on constant folding actually happening, and we don't have a
foolproof way of peering into the future.
Perhaps the correct fix is to revisit the node-iteration order during
legalization, ensuring we visit all uses of nodes before the nodes
themselves. Or alternatively we could try and clean up dead nodes
immediately after failing constant folding.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122382
Modified DAGCombiner to pass the shift the bittest input and the shift amount
to hasBitTest. This matches the other call to hasBitTest in TargetLowering.h
This is an alternative to D122454.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122458
We could only do this in limited ways (since we emit the TUs first, we
can't use ref_addr (& we can't use that in Split DWARF either) - so we
had to synthesize declarations into the TUs) and they were ambiguous in
some cases (if the CU type had internal linkage, parsing the TU would
require knowing which CU was referencing the TU to know which type the
declaration was for, which seems not-ideal). So to avoid all that, let's
just not reference types defined in the CU from TUs - instead moving the
TU type into the CU (recursively).
This does increase debug info size (by pulling more things out of type
units, into the compile unit) - about 2% of uncompressed dwp file size
for clang -O0 -g -gsplit-dwarf. (5% .debug_info.dwo section size
increase in the .dwp)
There is a case when a function has pseudo probe intrinsics but the module it resides does not have the probe desc. This could happen when the current module is not built with `-fpseudo-probe-for-profiling` while a function in it calls some other function from a probed module. In thinLTO mode, the callee function could be imported and inlined into the current function.
While this is undefined behavior, I'm fixing the asm printer to not ICE and warn user about this.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121737
Sanjay Patel