name. If the dependent name happened to end in a template-id (X<T>::Y<U>), we
would fail to notice that the 'typename' keyword is missing when resolving it
to a type.
It turns out that GCC has a similar bug. If this shows up in much real code, we
can easily downgrade this to an ExtWarn.
llvm-svn: 293815
specialized than the primary template. (Put another way, if we imagine there
were a partial specialization matching the primary template, we should never
select it if some other partial specialization also matches.)
llvm-svn: 290593
The problem is that the parameter pack in a function type type alias is not
reexpanded after being transformed. Also remove an incorrect comment in a
similar function. Fixes PR26017.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21030
llvm-svn: 274566
non-dependent types, in CXXScalarValueInitExprs and in the
nested-name-specifier or template arguments of a DeclRefExpr in particular.
llvm-svn: 220028
it. Diagnose with recovery if it appears after a function parameter that was
obviously supposed to be a parameter pack. Otherwise, warn if it immediately
follows a function parameter pack, because the user most likely didn't intend
to write a parameter pack followed by a C-style varargs ellipsis.
This warning can be syntactically disabled by using ", ..." instead of "...".
llvm-svn: 215408
issue 1430. Don't allow a pack expansion to be used as an argument to an alias
template unless the corresponding parameter is a parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 198833
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
does not substitute a sizeof-pack expression.
The solution is proposed by Richard Smith.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D869
llvm-svn: 186306
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
and a function template instantiation, if there's a parameter pack in the
declaration and one at the same place in the instantiation, don't assume that
the pack wasn't expanded -- it may have expanded to nothing. Instead, go ahead
and check whether the parameter pack was expandable. We can do this as a
side-effect of the work we'd need to do anyway, to find how many parameters
were produced.
llvm-svn: 160416
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
template without a corresponding parameter pack, don't immediately
substitute the alias template. This is under discussion in the C++
committee, and may become ill-formed, but for now we match GCC.
llvm-svn: 149697
template. Such pack expansions can easily fail at template
instantiation time, if the expanded parameter packs are of the wrong
length. Fixes <rdar://problem/10040867>, PR9021, and the example that
came up today at Going Native.
llvm-svn: 149685
This makes the code duplication of implicit special member handling even worse,
but the cleanup will have to come later. For now, this works.
Follow-up with tests for explicit defaulting and enabling the __has_feature
flag to come.
llvm-svn: 138821
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
together. In particular:
- Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
(BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
- Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
- Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).
Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.
llvm-svn: 123849
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
non-variadic function template over a variadic one. This matches GCC
and the intent of the C++0x wording, in a way that I think is likely
to be acceptable to the committee.
llvm-svn: 123581
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
expansion in it, we may end up instantiating to an empty
expression-list. In this case, the variable is uninitialized; tweak
the instantiation logic to handle this case. Fixes PR8977.
llvm-svn: 123449
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
Richard Smith