When we have an offset into a global, etc. that is accessed relative to the TOC
base pointer, and the offset is larger than the minimum alignment of the global
itself and the TOC base pointer (which is 8-byte aligned), we can still fold
the @toc@ha into the memory access, but we must update the addis instruction's
symbol reference with the offset as the symbol addend. When there is only one
use of the addi to be folded and only one use of the addis that would need its
symbol's offset adjusted, then we can make the adjustment and fold the @toc@l
into the memory access.
llvm-svn: 280545
When applying our address-formation PPC64 peephole, we are reusing the @ha TOC
addis value with the low parts associated with different offsets (i.e.
different effective symbol addends). We were assuming this was okay so long as
the offsets were less than the alignment of the global variable being accessed.
This ignored the fact, however, that the TOC base pointer itself need only be
8-byte aligned. As a result, what we were doing is legal only for offsets less
than 8 regardless of the alignment of the object being accessed.
Fixes PR28727.
llvm-svn: 280441
The logic in this function assumes that the P8 supports fusion of addis/addi,
but it does not. As a result, there is no advantage to restricting our peephole
application, merging addi instructions into dependent memory accesses, even
when the addi has multiple users, regardless of whether or not we're optimizing
for size.
We might need something like this again for the P9; I suspect we'll revisit
this code when we work on P9 tuning.
llvm-svn: 280440
Currently we have a number of tests that fail with -verify-machineinstrs.
To detect this cases earlier we add the option to the testcases with the
exception of tests that will currently fail with this option. PR 27456 keeps
track of this failures.
No code review, as discussed with Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 277624
Access to aligned globals gives us a chance to peephole optimize nonzero
offsets. If a struct is 4 byte aligned, then accesses to bytes 0-3 won't
overflow the available displacement. For example:
addis 3, 2, b4v@toc@ha
addi 4, 3, b4v@toc@l
lbz 5, b4v@toc@l(3) ; This is the result of the current peephole
lbz 6, 1(4) ; optimizer
lbz 7, 2(4)
lbz 8, 3(4)
If b4v is 4-byte aligned, we can skip using register 4 because we know
that b4v@toc@l+{1,2,3} won't overflow 32K, and instead generate:
addis 3, 2, b4v@toc@ha
lbz 4, b4v@toc@l(3)
lbz 5, b4v@toc@l+1(3)
lbz 6, b4v@toc@l+2(3)
lbz 7, b4v@toc@l+3(3)
Saving a register and an addition.
Larger alignments allow larger structures/arrays to be optimized.
llvm-svn: 255319
Hal Finkel