TableGen already generates code for selecting a G_FMUL, so we only need
to add a test for that part.
For the legalizer and reg bank select, we do the same thing as the other
floating point binary operators: either mark as legal if we have a FP
unit or lower to a libcall, and map to the floating point registers.
llvm-svn: 318910
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This changes the interface of how targets describe how to legalize, see
the below description.
1. Interface for targets to describe how to legalize.
In GlobalISel, the API in the LegalizerInfo class is the main interface
for targets to specify which types are legal for which operations, and
what to do to turn illegal type/operation combinations into legal ones.
For each operation the type sizes that can be legalized without having
to change the size of the type are specified with a call to setAction.
This isn't different to how GlobalISel worked before. For example, for a
target that supports 32 and 64 bit adds natively:
for (auto Ty : {s32, s64})
setAction({G_ADD, 0, s32}, Legal);
or for a target that needs a library call for a 32 bit division:
setAction({G_SDIV, s32}, Libcall);
The main conceptual change to the LegalizerInfo API, is in specifying
how to legalize the type sizes for which a change of size is needed. For
example, in the above example, how to specify how all types from i1 to
i8388607 (apart from s32 and s64 which are legal) need to be legalized
and expressed in terms of operations on the available legal sizes
(again, i32 and i64 in this case). Before, the implementation only
allowed specifying power-of-2-sized types (e.g. setAction({G_ADD, 0,
s128}, NarrowScalar). A worse limitation was that if you'd wanted to
specify how to legalize all the sized types as allowed by the LLVM-IR
LangRef, i1 to i8388607, you'd have to call setAction 8388607-3 times
and probably would need a lot of memory to store all of these
specifications.
Instead, the legalization actions that need to change the size of the
type are specified now using a "SizeChangeStrategy". For example:
setLegalizeScalarToDifferentSizeStrategy(
G_ADD, 0, widenToLargerAndNarrowToLargest);
This example indicates that for type sizes for which there is a larger
size that can be legalized towards, do it by Widening the size.
For example, G_ADD on s17 will be legalized by first doing WidenScalar
to make it s32, after which it's legal.
The "NarrowToLargest" indicates what to do if there is no larger size
that can be legalized towards. E.g. G_ADD on s92 will be legalized by
doing NarrowScalar to s64.
Another example, taken from the ARM backend is:
for (unsigned Op : {G_SDIV, G_UDIV}) {
setLegalizeScalarToDifferentSizeStrategy(Op, 0,
widenToLargerTypesUnsupportedOtherwise);
if (ST.hasDivideInARMMode())
setAction({Op, s32}, Legal);
else
setAction({Op, s32}, Libcall);
}
For this example, G_SDIV on s8, on a target without a divide
instruction, would be legalized by first doing action (WidenScalar,
s32), followed by (Libcall, s32).
The same principle is also followed for when the number of vector lanes
on vector data types need to be changed, e.g.:
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(8, 8)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(16, 8)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(4, 16)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(8, 16)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(2, 32)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(4, 32)}, LegalizerInfo::Legal);
setLegalizeVectorElementToDifferentSizeStrategy(
G_ADD, 0, widenToLargerTypesUnsupportedOtherwise);
As currently implemented here, vector types are legalized by first
making the vector element size legal, followed by then making the number
of lanes legal. The strategy to follow in the first step is set by a
call to setLegalizeVectorElementToDifferentSizeStrategy, see example
above. The strategy followed in the second step
"moreToWiderTypesAndLessToWidest" (see code for its definition),
indicating that vectors are widened to more elements so they map to
natively supported vector widths, or when there isn't a legal wider
vector, split the vector to map it to the widest vector supported.
Therefore, for the above specification, some example legalizations are:
* getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(3, 3)})
returns {WidenScalar, LLT::vector(3, 8)}
* getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(3, 8)})
then returns {MoreElements, LLT::vector(8, 8)}
* getAction({G_ADD, LLT::vector(20, 8)})
returns {FewerElements, LLT::vector(16, 8)}
2. Key implementation aspects.
How to legalize a specific (operation, type index, size) tuple is
represented by mapping intervals of integers representing a range of
size types to an action to take, e.g.:
setScalarAction({G_ADD, LLT:scalar(1)},
{{1, WidenScalar}, // bit sizes [ 1, 31[
{32, Legal}, // bit sizes [32, 33[
{33, WidenScalar}, // bit sizes [33, 64[
{64, Legal}, // bit sizes [64, 65[
{65, NarrowScalar} // bit sizes [65, +inf[
});
Please note that most of the code to do the actual lowering of
non-power-of-2 sized types is currently missing, this is just trying to
make it possible for targets to specify what is legal, and how non-legal
types should be legalized. Probably quite a bit of further work is
needed in the actual legalizing and the other passes in GlobalISel to
support non-power-of-2 sized types.
I hope the documentation in LegalizerInfo.h and the examples provided in the
various {Target}LegalizerInfo.cpp and LegalizerInfoTest.cpp explains well
enough how this is meant to be used.
This drops the need for LLT::{half,double}...Size().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30529
llvm-svn: 317560
Since the lambda isn't escaped (via a std::function or similar) it's
fine/better to use default capture-by-ref to provide semantics similar
to language-level nested scopes (if/for/while/etc).
llvm-svn: 311782
Treat widening G_SREM and G_UREM the same as G_SDIV and G_UDIV. This is
going to be used in the ARM backend (and that's when the test will come
too).
llvm-svn: 308278
This covers both hard and soft float.
Hard float is easy, since it's just Legal.
Soft float is more involved, because there are several different ways to
handle it based on the predicate: one and ueq need not only one, but two
libcalls to get a result. Furthermore, we have large differences between
the values returned by the AEABI and GNU functions.
AEABI functions return a nice 1 or 0 representing true and respectively
false. GNU functions generally return a value that needs to be compared
against 0 (e.g. for ogt, the value returned by the libcall is > 0 for
true). We could introduce redundant comparisons for AEABI as well, but
they don't seem easy to remove afterwards, so we do different processing
based on whether or not the result really needs to be compared against
something (and just truncate if it doesn't).
llvm-svn: 307243
We used to have a helper that replaced an instruction with a libcall.
That turns out to be too aggressive, since sometimes we need to replace
the instruction with at least two libcalls. Therefore, change our
existing helper to only create the libcall and leave the instruction
removal as a separate step. Also rename the helper accordingly.
llvm-svn: 307149
It looks like there are two target-independent but not GISel instructions that
need legalization, IMPLICIT_DEF and PHI. These are already anomalies since
their operands have important LLTs attached, so to make things more uniform it
seems like a good idea to add generic variants. Starting with G_IMPLICIT_DEF.
llvm-svn: 306875
Add support for modulo for targets that have hardware division and for
those that don't. When hardware division is not available, we have to
choose the correct libcall to use. This is generally straightforward,
except for AEABI.
The AEABI variant is trickier than the other libcalls because it
returns { quotient, remainder }, instead of just one value like the
other libcalls that we've seen so far. Therefore, we need to use custom
lowering for it. However, we don't want to have too much special code,
so we refactor the target-independent code in the legalizer by adding a
helper for replacing an instruction with a libcall. This helper is used
by the legalizer itself when dealing with simple calls, and also by the
custom ARM legalization for the more complicated AEABI divmod calls.
llvm-svn: 305459
Summary:
When legalizing G_LOAD/G_STORE using NarrowScalar, we should avoid emitting
%0 = G_CONSTANT ty 0
%1 = G_GEP %x, %0
since it's cheaper to not emit the redundant instructions than it is to fold them
away later.
Reviewers: qcolombet, t.p.northover, ab, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32746
llvm-svn: 305340
Treat them the same as the other binary operations that we have so far,
but on integers rather than floating point types. Extract the common
code into a helper.
This will be used in the ARM backend.
llvm-svn: 301163
Use the same handling in the generic legalizer code as for the other
libcalls (G_FREM, G_FPOW).
Enable it on ARM for float and double so we can test it.
llvm-svn: 299931
The original instruction might get legalized and erased and expanded
into intermediate instructions and the intermediate instructions might
fail legalization. This end up in reporting GISelFailure on the erased
instruction.
Instead report GISelFailure on the intermediate instruction which failed
legalization.
Reviewed by: ab
llvm-svn: 299802
A bool is represented by a single byte, which the ARM ABI requires to be either
0 or 1. So we cannot use G_ANYEXT when legalizing the type.
llvm-svn: 298439
This commit adds a parameter that lets us pass in the calling convention
of the call to CallLowering::lowerCall. This allows us to handle
situations where the calling convetion of the callee is different from
that of the caller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31039
llvm-svn: 298254
Summary: No test case as none of the in-tree targets with GlobalISel support has this condition.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, t.p.northover, ab
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30786
llvm-svn: 297512
Summary:
We don’t actually use LegalizerInfo in Legalizer pass, it’s just passed
as an argument.
In order to check if an instruction is legal or not, we need to get LegalizerInfo
by calling `MI.getParent()->getParent()->getSubtarget().getLegalizerInfo()`.
Instead, make LegalizerInfo accessible in LegalizerHelper.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, ab, t.p.northover, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, llvm-commits, rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30838
llvm-svn: 297491
We were calculating incorrect extract/insert offsets by trying to be too
tricksy with min/max. It's clearer to just split the logic up into "register
starts before this segment" vs "after".
llvm-svn: 297226
A bit more painful than G_INSERT because it was more widely used, but this
should simplify the handling of extract operations in most locations.
llvm-svn: 297100
Now that G_INSERT instructions can only insert one register, this code was
overly general. In another direction it didn't handle registers that crossed
split boundaries properly, which needed to be fixed.
llvm-svn: 297042
These are simplified variants of the current G_SEQUENCE and G_EXTRACT, which
assume the individual parts will be contiguous, homogeneous, and occupy the
entirity of the larger register. This makes reasoning about them much easer
since you only have to look at the first register being merged and the result
to know what the instruction is doing.
I intend to gradually replace all uses of the more complicated sequence/extract
with these (or single-element insert/extracts), and then remove the older
variants. For now we start with legalization.
llvm-svn: 296921
Uses a Custom implementation because the slot sizes being a multiple of the
pointer size isn't really universal, even for the architectures that do have a
simple "void *" va_list.
llvm-svn: 295255
AArch64 has specific instructions to multiply two numbers at double the width
and produce the high part of the result. These can be used to implement LLVM's
mul.with.overflow instructions fairly simply. Helps with C++ operator new[].
llvm-svn: 294519
We don't handle all cases yet (see arm64-fallback.ll for an example), but this
is enough to cover most common C++ code so it's a good place to start.
llvm-svn: 294247
Since we're now avoiding operations using narrow scalar integer types,
we have to legalize the integer side of the FP conversions.
This requires teaching the legalizer how to do that.
llvm-svn: 292828
This makes it more similar to the floating-point constant, and also allows for
larger constants to be translated later. There's no real functional change in
this patch though, just syntax updates.
llvm-svn: 288712
The previous names were both misleading (the MachineLegalizer actually
contained the info tables) and inconsistent with the selector & translator (in
having a "Machine") prefix. This should make everything sensible again.
The only functional change is the name of a couple of command-line options.
llvm-svn: 284287
Diana Picus