Base GNU ld is pretty ancient and does not support --dynamic-list flag.
For conveniency, we can it automatically when compile with ubsan sanitizer flag.
Reviewers: dberris
Reviewed by: dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48574
llvm-svn: 335856
Summary: - Since 6.2 release, on supporters platforms clang is shipped with both libcxx and libcxxabi.
Reviewers: dberris, alekseyshl, EricWF
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45662
llvm-svn: 330310
Summary:
This change fixes http://llvm.org/PR36985 to define a single place in
CommonArgs.{h,cpp} where XRay runtime flags and link-time dependencies
are processed for all toolchains that support XRay instrumentation. This
is a refactoring of the same functionality spread across multiple
toolchain definitions.
Reviewers: echristo, devnexen, eizan
Reviewed By: eizan
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45243
llvm-svn: 329372
Summary:
This patch was originally reviewed in D45126. It enables clang to add
the XRay runtime and the link-time dependencies for XRay instrumentation
in OpenBSD.
Landing for devnexen.
Reviewers: brad, dberris
Subscribers: dberris, krytarowski, cfe-commits
Author: devnexen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45126
llvm-svn: 329183
Summary:
Basic support of Sanitiser to follow-up ubsan support in compiler-rt.
Needs to use lld instead of base ld to be fully workable.
Patch by: David CARLIER
Reviewers: krytarowski, vitalybuka, kettenis
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43961
llvm-svn: 326648
Projects that want to statically link their own C++ standard library currently
need to pass -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs, which also disables linking of the
builtins library, -lm, and so on. Alternatively, they could use `clang` instead
of `clang++`, but that already disables implicit addition of -lm on some
toolchains.
Add a dedicated flag -nostdlib++ that disables just linking of libc++ /
libstdc++. This is analogous to -nostdinc++.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35780
llvm-svn: 308997
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
David Carlier