Summary: In performance tuning, we see performance benefits when enlarge the maximum num promotion targets to 3. This is safe as soon as we have total percentage threshold properly setup (https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962)
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35966
llvm-svn: 309346
Summary: In the current implementation, isPromotionProfitable only checks if the call count to a direct target is no less than a certain percentage threshold of the remaining call counts that have not been promoted. This causes code size problems when the target count is small but greater than a large portion of remaining counts. E.g. target1 takes 99.9%, while target2 takes 0.1%. Both targets will be promoted and inlined, makes the function size too large, which potentially prevents it from further inlining into its callers. This patch adds another percentage threshold against the total indirect call count. If the target count needs to be no less than both thresholds in order to be promoted speculatively.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962
llvm-svn: 309345
Summary:
Reduce min percent required for indirect call promotion from 33% to 30%,
which matches gcc's threshold and catches the same hot opportunities.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33798
llvm-svn: 304469
Summary:
Refactored the profitability analysis out of the IC promotion pass and
into lib/Analysis so that it can be accessed by the summary index
builder in a follow-on patch to enable IC promotion in ThinLTO (D21932).
Reviewers: davidxl, xur
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22182
llvm-svn: 275216
Dehao Chen