This patch is update after the first patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/rL309651) based on the post-commit comments.
Stack coloring pass need to maintain AliasAnalysis information when merging stack slots of different types.
Actually, there is a FIXME comment in StackColoring.cpp
// FIXME: In order to enable the use of TBAA when using AA in CodeGen,
// we'll also need to update the TBAA nodes in MMOs with values
// derived from the merged allocas.
But, TBAA has been already enabled in CodeGen without fixing this pass.
The incorrect TBAA metadata results in recent failures in bootstrap test on ppc64le (PR33928) by allowing unsafe instruction scheduling.
Although we observed the problem on ppc64le, this is a platform neutral issue.
This patch makes the stack coloring pass maintains AliasAnalysis information when merging multiple stack slots.
This patch fixes PR33928.
llvm-svn: 309849
If SCEV can prove that the backedge taken count for a loop is zero, it does not
need to "understand" a recursive PHI to compute its exiting value.
This should fix PR33885.
llvm-svn: 309758
This causes assertion failures in (a somewhat old version of) SpiderMonkey.
I have already forwarded reproduction instructions to the patch author.
llvm-svn: 309659
Stack coloring pass need to maintain AliasAnalysis information when merging stack slots of different types.
Actually, there is a FIXME comment in StackColoring.cpp
// FIXME: In order to enable the use of TBAA when using AA in CodeGen,
// we'll also need to update the TBAA nodes in MMOs with values
// derived from the merged allocas.
But, TBAA has been already enabled in CodeGen without fixing this pass.
The incorrect TBAA metadata results in recent failures in bootstrap test on ppc64le (PR33928) by allowing unsafe instruction scheduling.
Although we observed the problem on ppc64le, this is a platform neutral issue.
This patch makes the stack coloring pass maintains AliasAnalysis information when merging multiple stack slots.
llvm-svn: 309651
Summary:
Adding part of the changes in D30369 (needed to make progress):
Current patch updates AliasAnalysis and MemoryLocation, but does _not_ clean up MemorySSA.
Original summary from D30369, by dberlin:
Currently, we have instructions which affect memory but have no memory
location. If you call, for example, MemoryLocation::get on a fence,
it asserts. This means things specifically have to avoid that. It
also means we end up with a copy of each API, one taking a memory
location, one not.
This starts to fix that.
We add MemoryLocation::getOrNone as a new call, and reimplement the
old asserting version in terms of it.
We make MemoryLocation optional in the (Instruction, MemoryLocation)
version of getModRefInfo, and kill the old one argument version in
favor of passing None (it had one caller). Now both can handle fences
because you can just use MemoryLocation::getOrNone on an instruction
and it will return a correct answer.
We use all this to clean up part of MemorySSA that had to handle this difference.
Note that literally every actual getModRefInfo interface we have could be made private and replaced with:
getModRefInfo(Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>)
and
getModRefInfo(Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>, Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>)
and delegating to the right ones, if we wanted to.
I have not attempted to do this yet.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, dblaikie
Subscribers: sanjoy, hfinkel, chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35441
llvm-svn: 309641
Summary:
Inlining threshold is increased by application of bonuses when the
callee has a single reachable basic block or is rich in vector
instructions. Similarly, inlining cost is reduced by applying a large
bonus when the last call to a static function is considered for
inlining. This patch disables the application of these bonuses when the
callsite or the callee is cold. The intention here is to prevent a large
cold callsite from being inlined to a non-cold caller that could prevent
the caller from being inlined. This is especially important when the
cold callsite is a last call to a static since the associated bonus is
very high.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl
Subscribers: danielcdh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35823
llvm-svn: 309441
Summary:
LazyValueInfo currently computes the constant value of the switch condition through case edges, which allows the constant value to be propagated through the case edges.
But we have seen a case where a zero-extended value of the switch condition is used past case edges for which the constant propagation doesn't occur.
This patch adds a small logic to handle such a case in getEdgeValueLocal().
This is motivated by the Python 2.7 eval loop in PyEval_EvalFrameEx() where the lack of the constant propagation causes longer live ranges and more spill code than necessary.
With this patch, we see that the code size of PyEval_EvalFrameEx() decreases by ~5.4% and a performance test improves by ~4.6%.
Reviewers: wmi, dberlin, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: davide, davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34822
llvm-svn: 309415
This patch reworks the function that searches constants in Add and Mul SCEV expression
chains so that now it does not visit a node more than once, and also renames this function
for better correspondence between its implementation and semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35931
llvm-svn: 309367
This reverts commit r309080. The patch needs to clear out the
ScalarEvolution::ExitLimits cache in forgetMemoizedResults.
I've replied on the commit thread for the patch with more details.
llvm-svn: 309357
Summary: In performance tuning, we see performance benefits when enlarge the maximum num promotion targets to 3. This is safe as soon as we have total percentage threshold properly setup (https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962)
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35966
llvm-svn: 309346
Summary: In the current implementation, isPromotionProfitable only checks if the call count to a direct target is no less than a certain percentage threshold of the remaining call counts that have not been promoted. This causes code size problems when the target count is small but greater than a large portion of remaining counts. E.g. target1 takes 99.9%, while target2 takes 0.1%. Both targets will be promoted and inlined, makes the function size too large, which potentially prevents it from further inlining into its callers. This patch adds another percentage threshold against the total indirect call count. If the target count needs to be no less than both thresholds in order to be promoted speculatively.
Reviewers: davidxl, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35962
llvm-svn: 309345
Currently CallAnalyzer::isGEPFree uses TTI::getGEPCost to check if GEP is free.
TTI::getGEPCost cannot handle cases when GEPs participate in Def-Use dependencies
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D31186 for example).
There is TTI::getUserCost which can calculate the cost more accurately by
taking dependencies into account.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33685
llvm-svn: 309268
This patch adds a cache for computeExitLimit to save compilation time. A lot of examples of
tests that take extensive time to compile are attached to the bug 33494.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35827
llvm-svn: 309080
`SCEVUnknown::allUsesReplacedWith` does not need to call `forgetMemoizedResults`
since RAUW does a value-equivalent replacement by assumption. If this
assumption was false then the later setValPtr(New) call would be incorrect too.
This is a non-trivial performance optimization for functions with a large number
of loops since `forgetMemoizedResults` walks all loop backedge taken counts to
see if any of them use the SCEVUnknown being RAUWed. However, this improvement
is difficult to demonstrate without checking in an excessively large IR file.
llvm-svn: 309072
When SCEV calculates product of two SCEVAddRecs from the same loop, it
tries to combine them into one big AddRecExpr. If the sizes of the initial
SCEVs were `S1` and `S2`, the size of their product is `S1 + S2 - 1`, and every
operand of the resulting SCEV is combined from operands of initial SCEV and
has much higher complexity than they have.
As result, if we try to calculate something like:
%x1 = {a,+,b}
%x2 = mul i32 %x1, %x1
%x3 = mul i32 %x2, %x1
%x4 = mul i32 %x3, %x2
...
The size of such SCEVs grows as `2^N`, and the arguments
become more and more complex as we go forth. This leads
to long compilation and huge memory consumption.
This patch sets a limit after which we don't try to combine two
`SCEVAddRecExpr`s into one. By default, max allowed size of the
resulting AddRecExpr is set to 16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35664
llvm-svn: 308847
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
llvm-svn: 308729
functions.
In the prior commit, we provide ordering to the LCG between functions
and library function definitions that they might begin to call through
transformations. But we still would delete these library functions from
the call graph if they became dead during inlining.
While this immediately crashed, it also exposed a loss of information.
We shouldn't remove definitions of library functions that can still
usefully participate in the LCG-powered CGSCC optimization process. If
new call edges are formed, we want to have definitions to be called.
We can still remove these functions if truly dead using global-dce, etc,
but removing them during the CGSCC walk is premature.
This fixes a crash in the new PM when optimizing some unusual libraries
that end up with "internal" lib functions such as the code in the "R"
language's libraries.
llvm-svn: 308417
using runtime checks
Extend the SCEVPredicateRewriter to work a bit harder when it encounters an
UnknownSCEV for a Phi node; Try to build an AddRecurrence also for Phi nodes
whose update chain involves casts that can be ignored under the proper runtime
overflow test. This is one step towards addressing PR30654.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30041
llvm-svn: 308299
Summary:
Previously, we counted TotalMemInst by reading certain instruction counters before and after calling visit and then finding the difference. But that wouldn't be thread safe if this same pass was being ran on multiple threads.
This list of "memory instructions" doesn't make sense to me as it includes call/invoke and is missing atomics.
This patch removes the counter all together.
Reviewers: hfinkel, chandlerc, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33608
llvm-svn: 308260
function to every defined function known to LLVM as a library function.
LLVM can introduce calls to these functions either by replacing other
library calls or by recognizing patterns (such as memset_pattern or
vector math patterns) and replacing those with calls. When these library
functions are actually defined in the module, we need to have reference
edges to them initially so that we visit them during the CGSCC walk in
the right order and can effectively rebuild the call graph afterward.
This was discovered when building code with Fortify enabled as that is
a common case of both inline definitions of library calls and
simplifications of code into calling them.
This can in extreme cases of LTO-ing with libc introduce *many* more
reference edges. I discussed a bunch of different options with folks but
all of them are unsatisfying. They either make the graph operations
substantially more complex even when there are *no* defined libfuncs, or
they introduce some other complexity into the callgraph. So this patch
goes with the simplest possible solution of actual synthetic reference
edges. If this proves to be a memory problem, I'm happy to implement one
of the clever techniques to save memory here.
llvm-svn: 308088
Now, getUserCost() only checks the src and dst types of EXT to decide it is free
or not. This change first checks the types, then calls isExtFreeImpl(), and
check if EXT can form ExtLoad at last. Currently, only AArch64 has customized
implementation of isExtFreeImpl() to check if EXT can be folded into its use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34458
llvm-svn: 308076
Summary:
DominatorTreeBase used to have IsPostDominators (bool) member to indicate if the tree is a dominator or a postdominator tree. This made it possible to switch between the two 'modes' at runtime, but it isn't used in practice anywhere.
This patch makes IsPostDominator a template argument. This way, it is easier to switch between different algorithms at compile-time based on this argument and design external utilities around it. It also makes it impossible to incidentally assign a postdominator tree to a dominator tree (and vice versa), and to further simplify template code in GenericDominatorTreeConstruction.
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide, grosser
Reviewed By: dberlin
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35315
llvm-svn: 308040
I used the wrong variable to update. This was even covered by a unittest
I wrote, and the comments for the unittest were correct (if confusing)
but the test itself just matched the buggy behavior. =[
llvm-svn: 307764
Summary:
Solves PR33689.
If the pointer size is less than the size of the type used for the array
size in an alloca (the <ty> type below) then we could trigger the assert in
the PR. In that example we have pointer size i16 and <ty> is i32.
<result> = alloca [inalloca] <type> [, <ty> <NumElements>] [, align <alignment>]
Handle the situation by allowing truncation as well as zero extension in
ObjectSizeOffsetVisitor::visitAllocaInst().
Also, we now detect overflow in visitAllocaInst(), similar to how it was
already done in visitCallSite().
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35003
llvm-svn: 307754
invalidation of analyses when merging SCCs.
While I've added a bunch of testing of this, it takes something much
more like the inliner to really trigger this as you need to have
partially-analyzed SCCs with updates at just the right time. So I've
added a direct test for this using the inliner and verifying the
domtree. Without the changes here, this test ends up finding a stale
dominator tree.
However, to handle this properly, we need to invalidate analyses
*before* merging the SCCs. After talking to Philip and Sanjoy about this
they convinced me this was the right approach. To do this, we need
a callback mechanism when merging SCCs so we can observe the cycle that
will be merged before the merge happens. This API update ended up being
surprisingly easy.
With this commit, the new PM passes the test-suite again. It hadn't
since MemorySSA was enabled for EarlyCSE as that also will find this bug
very quickly.
llvm-svn: 307498
dependencies between analyses.
This uncovers even more issues with the proxies and the splitting apart
of SCCs which are fixed in this patch. I discovered this while trying to
add more rigorous testing for a change I'm making to the call graph
update invalidation logic.
llvm-svn: 307497
the invalidation propagation logic from an SCC to a Function.
I wrote the infrastructure to test this but didn't actually use it in
the unit test where it was designed to be used. =[ My bad. Once
I actually added it to the test case I discovered that it also hadn't
been properly implemented, so I've implemented it. The logic in the FAM
proxy for an SCC pass to propagate invalidation follows the same ideas
as the FAM proxy for a Module pass, but the implementation is a bit
different to reflect the fact that it is forwarding just for an SCC.
However, implementing this correctly uncovered a surprising "bug" (it
was conservatively correct but relatively very expensive) in how we
handle invalidation when splitting one SCC into multiple SCCs. We did an
eager invalidation when in reality we should be deferring invaliadtion
for the *current* SCC to the CGSCC pass manager and just invaliating the
newly constructed SCCs. Otherwise we end up invalidating too much too
soon. This was exposed by the inliner test case that I've updated. Now,
we invalidate *just* the split off '(test1_f)' SCC when doing the CG
update, and then the inliner finishes and invalidates the '(test1_g,
test1_h)' SCC's analyses. The first few attempts at fixing this hit
still more bugs, but all of those are covered by existing tests. For
example, the inliner should also preserve the FAM proxy to avoid
unnecesasry invalidation, and this is safe because the CG update
routines it uses handle any necessary adjustments to the FAM proxy.
Finally, the unittests for the CGSCC pass manager needed a bunch of
updates where we weren't correctly preserving the FAM proxy because it
hadn't been fully implemented and failing to preserve it didn't matter.
Note that this doesn't yet fix the current crasher due to MemSSA finding
a stale dominator tree, but without this the fix to that crasher doesn't
really make any sense when testing because it relies on the proxy
behavior.
llvm-svn: 307487
Summary: For interative sample-pgo, if a hot call site is inlined in the profiling binary, we should inline it in before profile annotation in the backend. Before that, the compile phase first collects all GUIDs that needs to be imported and creates virtual "hot" call edge in the summary. However, "hot" is not good enough to guarantee the callsites get inlined. This patch introduces "critical" call edge, and assign much higher importing threshold for those edges.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35096
llvm-svn: 307439
Hiroshi Inoue