This shows up as a side issue to the main problem for the AVX target example from PR37428:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428 - https://godbolt.org/z/7tpRa3
But as we can see in the pile of existing test diffs, it's actually a widespread problem
that affects any AVX or later target. Apart from a couple of oddballs, I think these are
all improvements for the reasons stated in the code comment: we do not want to enable YMM
unnecessarily (avoid vzeroupper and frequency throttling) and some cores split 256-bit
stores anyway.
We could say that MergeConsecutiveStores() is going overboard on some of these examples,
but that won't solve the problem completely. But that is a reason I'm proposing this as
a lowering rather than a combine: we will infinite loop fighting the merge code if we try
this earlier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62498
llvm-svn: 362524
This shows up as a side issue to the main problem for the AVX target example from PR37428:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428 - https://godbolt.org/z/7tpRa3
But as we can see in the pile of existing test diffs, it's actually a widespread problem
that affects any AVX or later target. Apart from a couple of oddballs, I think these are
all improvements for the reasons stated in the code comment: we do not want to enable YMM
unnecessarily (avoid vzeroupper and frequency throttling) and some cores split 256-bit
stores anyway.
We could say that MergeConsecutiveStores() is going overboard on some of these examples,
but that won't solve the problem completely. But that is the reason I'm proposing this as
a lowering rather than a combine: we will infinite loop fighting the merge code if we try
this earlier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62498
llvm-svn: 361822
This patch replaces the --x86_extra_scrub command line argument to automatically support a second level of regex-scrubbing if it improves the matching of nearly-identical code patterns. The argument '--extra_scrub' is there now to force extra matching if required.
This is mostly useful to help us share 32-bit/64-bit x86 vector tests which only differs by retl/retq instructions, but any scrubber can now technically support this, meaning test checks don't have to be needlessly obfuscated.
I've updated some of the existing checks that had been manually run with --x86_extra_scrub, to demonstrate the extra "ret{{[l|q]}}" scrub now only happens when useful, and re-run the sse42-intrinsics file to show extra matches - most sse/avx intrinsics files should be able to now share 32/64 checks.
Tested with the opt/analysis scripts as well which share common code - AFAICT the other update scripts use their own versions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47485
llvm-svn: 333749
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
The VRNDSCALE instructions implement a superset of the (V)ROUND instructions. They are equivalent if the upper 4-bits of the immediate are 0.
This patch lowers the legacy intrinsics to the VRNDSCALE ISD node and masks the upper bits of the immediate to 0. This allows us to take advantage of the larger register encoding space.
We should maybe consider converting VRNDSCALE back to VROUND in the EVEX to VEX pass if the extended registers are not being used.
I notice some load folding opportunities being missed for the VRNDSCALESS/SD instructions that I'll try to fix in future patches.
llvm-svn: 318008
Summary:
AVX512 added RCP14 and RSQRT instructions which improve accuracy over the legacy RCP and RSQRT instruction, but not enough accuracy to remove the need for a Newton Raphson refinement.
Currently we use these new instructions for the legacy packed SSE instrinics, but not the scalar instrinsics. And we use it for fast math optimization of division and reciprocal sqrt.
I think switching the legacy instrinsics maybe surprising to the user since it changes the answer based on which processor you're using regardless of any fastmath settings. It's also weird that we did something different between scalar and packed.
As far at the reciprocal estimation, I think it creates unnecessary deltas in our output behavior (and prevents EVEX->VEX). A little playing around with gcc and icc and godbolt suggest they don't change which instructions they use here.
This patch adds new X86ISD nodes for the RCP14/RSQRT14 and uses those for the new intrinsics. Leaving the old intrinsics to use the old instructions.
Going forward I think our focus should be on
-Supporting 512-bit vectors, which will have to use the RCP14/RSQRT14.
-Using RSQRT28/RCP28 to remove the Newton Raphson step on processors with AVX512ER
-Supporting double precision.
Reviewers: zvi, DavidKreitzer, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39583
llvm-svn: 317413
I've moved the test cases from the InstCombine optimizations to the backend to keep the coverage we had there. It covered every possible immediate so I've preserved the resulting shuffle mask for each of those immediates.
llvm-svn: 313450
I'm going to autoupgrade these intrinsics in a future commit. This bit will never be set in the resulting output so pre-removing the bit.
llvm-svn: 313434
Convert vector increment or decrement to sub/add with an all-ones constant:
add X, <1, 1...> --> sub X, <-1, -1...>
sub X, <1, 1...> --> add X, <-1, -1...>
The all-ones vector constant can be materialized using a pcmpeq instruction that is
commonly recognized as an idiom (has no register dependency), so that's better than
loading a splat 1 constant.
AVX512 uses 'vpternlogd' for 512-bit vectors because there is apparently no better
way to produce 512 one-bits.
The general advantages of this lowering are:
1. pcmpeq has lower latency than a memop on every uarch I looked at in Agner's tables,
so in theory, this could be better for perf, but...
2. That seems unlikely to affect any OOO implementation, and I can't measure any real
perf difference from this transform on Haswell or Jaguar, but...
3. It doesn't look like it from the diffs, but this is an overall size win because we
eliminate 16 - 64 constant bytes in the case of a vector load. If we're broadcasting
a scalar load (which might itself be a bug), then we're replacing a scalar constant
load + broadcast with a single cheap op, so that should always be smaller/better too.
4. This makes the DAG/isel output more consistent - we use pcmpeq already for padd x, -1
and psub x, -1, so we should use that form for +1 too because we can. If there's some
reason to favor a constant load on some CPU, let's make the reverse transform for all
of these cases (either here in the DAG or in a later machine pass).
This should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33483
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34336
llvm-svn: 306289
I noticed unnecessary 'sbb' instructions in D30472 and while looking at 'ptest' codegen recently.
This happens because we were transforming any 'setb' - even when we only wanted a single-bit result.
This patch moves those transforms under visitAdd/visitSub, so we we're only creating sbb/adc when it
is a win. I don't know why we need a SETCC_CARRY node type, but I'm not proposing to change that
existing behavior in this patch.
Also, I'm skeptical that sbb/adc are a win for all micro-arches, so I added comments to the test files
where this transform still fires.
The test changes here are all cases where we no longer produce sbb/adc. Avoiding partial register
stalls (generating an xor to clear a register) is not handled in some cases, but that's a separate
issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30611
llvm-svn: 297586
VZEROUPPER should not be issued on Knights Landing (KNL), but on Skylake-avx512 it should be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29874
llvm-svn: 296859
They are all covered by the SSE4.2 intrinsics test with SSE4.2, AVX, and AVX512 command lines.
Merge sse42.ll into the other intrinsics test. Rename sse42_64.ll to be named like other intrinsic tests.
llvm-svn: 295707
They are all covered by the SSE2 intrinsics test with SSE2, AVX, and AVX512 command lines.
Also remove an unneeded lfence intrinsic test since it was already covered.
llvm-svn: 295700
They are all covered by the SSE intrinsics test with SSE, AVX, and AVX512 command lines.
Also remove an unneeded sfence intrinsic test since it was already covered.
llvm-svn: 295699
There are cases of AVX-512 instructions that have two possible encodings. This is the case with instructions that use vector registers with low indexes of 0 - 15 and do not use the zmm registers or the mask k registers.
The EVEX encoding prefix requires 4 bytes whereas the VEX prefix can take only up to 3 bytes. Consequently, using the VEX encoding for these instructions results in a code size reduction of ~2 bytes even though it is compiled with the AVX-512 features enabled.
Reviewers: Craig Topper, Zvi Rackoover, Elena Demikhovsky
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27901
llvm-svn: 290663
Summary: These intrinsics have been unused for clang for a while. This patch removes them. We auto upgrade them to extractelements, a scalar operation and then an insertelement. This matches the sequence used by clangs intrinsic file.
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26660
llvm-svn: 287083
-Don't print the 'x' suffix for the 128-bit reg/mem VEX encoded instructions in Intel syntax. This is consistent with the EVEX versions.
-Don't print the 'y' suffix for the 256-bit reg/reg VEX encoded instructions in Intel or AT&T syntax. This is consistent with the EVEX versions.
-Allow the 'x' and 'y' suffixes to be used for the reg/mem forms when we're assembling using Intel syntax.
-Allow the 'x' and 'y' suffixes on the reg/reg EVEX encoded instructions in Intel or AT&T syntax. This is consistent with what VEX was already allowing.
This should fix at least some of PR28850.
llvm-svn: 286787
Summary: This allows the SSE intrinsic to use the EVEX instruction when available. It also fixes EVEX to not use a weird (v4i32 (fp_to_sint v2f64)) node and it merges some isel patterns. This also fixes some cases that weren't combining vzmovl with cvttpd2dq to remove extra moves.
Reviewers: delena, zvi, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26330
llvm-svn: 286344
As reported on PR26235, we don't currently make use of the VBROADCASTF128/VBROADCASTI128 instructions (or the AVX512 equivalents) to load+splat a 128-bit vector to both lanes of a 256-bit vector.
This patch enables lowering from subvector insertion/concatenation patterns and auto-upgrades the llvm.x86.avx.vbroadcastf128.pd.256 / llvm.x86.avx.vbroadcastf128.ps.256 intrinsics to match.
We could possibly investigate using VBROADCASTF128/VBROADCASTI128 to load repeated constants as well (similar to how we already do for scalar broadcasts).
Reapplied with fix for PR28657 - removed intrinsic definitions (clang companion patch to be be submitted shortly).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22460
llvm-svn: 276416
As reported on PR26235, we don't currently make use of the VBROADCASTF128/VBROADCASTI128 instructions (or the AVX512 equivalents) to load+splat a 128-bit vector to both lanes of a 256-bit vector.
This patch enables lowering from subvector insertion/concatenation patterns and auto-upgrades the llvm.x86.avx.vbroadcastf128.pd.256 / llvm.x86.avx.vbroadcastf128.ps.256 intrinsics to match.
We could possibly investigate using VBROADCASTF128/VBROADCASTI128 to load repeated constants as well (similar to how we already do for scalar broadcasts).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22460
llvm-svn: 276281
D20859 and D20860 attempted to replace the SSE (V)CVTTPS2DQ and VCVTTPD2DQ truncating conversions with generic IR instead.
It turns out that the behaviour of these intrinsics is different enough from generic IR that this will cause problems, INF/NAN/out of range values are guaranteed to result in a 0x80000000 value - which plays havoc with constant folding which converts them to either zero or UNDEF. This is also an issue with the scalar implementations (which were already generic IR and what I was trying to match).
This patch changes both scalar and packed versions back to using x86-specific builtins.
It also deals with the other scalar conversion cases that are runtime rounding mode dependent and can have similar issues with constant folding.
A companion clang patch is at D22105
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22106
llvm-svn: 275981
xorl + setcc is generally the preferred sequence due to the partial register
stall setcc + movzbl suffers from. As a bonus, it also encodes one byte smaller.
This fixes PR28146.
The original commit tried inserting an 8bit-subreg into a GR32 (not GR32_ABCD)
which was not appreciated by fast regalloc on 32-bit.
llvm-svn: 274802
xorl + setcc is generally the preferred sequence due to the partial register
stall setcc + movzbl suffers from. As a bonus, it also encodes one byte smaller.
This fixes PR28146.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21774
llvm-svn: 274692
This patch allows target shuffles to be combined to single input immediate permute instructions - (V)PSHUFD/VPERMILPD/VPERMILPS - allowing more general pattern matching than what we current do and improves the likelihood of memory folding compared to existing patterns which tend to reuse the input in multiple arguments.
Further permute instructions (V)PSHUFLW/(V)PSHUFHW/(V)PERMQ/(V)PERMPD may be added in the future but its proven tricky to create tests cases for them so far. (V)PSHUFLW/(V)PSHUFHW is already handled quite well in combineTargetShuffle so it may be that removing some of that code may allow us to perform more of the combining in one place without duplication.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21148
llvm-svn: 273999
Sanjay Patel