This CL revisits the composition of AffineApplyOp for the special case where a symbol
itself comes from an AffineApplyOp.
This is achieved by rewriting such symbols into dims to allow composition to occur mathematically.
The implementation is also refactored to improve readability.
Rationale for locally rewriting symbols as dims:
================================================
The mathematical composition of AffineMap must always concatenate symbols
because it does not have enough information to do otherwise. For example,
composing `(d0)[s0] -> (d0 + s0)` with itself must produce
`(d0)[s0, s1] -> (d0 + s0 + s1)`.
The result is only equivalent to `(d0)[s0] -> (d0 + 2 * s0)` when
applied to the same mlir::Value* for both s0 and s1.
As a consequence mathematical composition of AffineMap always concatenates
symbols.
When AffineMaps are used in AffineApplyOp however, they may specify
composition via symbols, which is ambiguous mathematically. This corner case
is handled by locally rewriting such symbols that come from AffineApplyOp
into dims and composing through dims.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 239791597
* AffineStructures has moved to IR.
* simplifyAffineExpr/simplifyAffineMap/getFlattenedAffineExpr have moved to IR.
* makeComposedAffineApply/fullyComposeAffineMapAndOperands have moved to AffineOps.
* ComposeAffineMaps is replaced by AffineApplyOp::canonicalize and deleted.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 232586468
River Riddle