Currently, regions can only be constructed by passing in a `Function` or an
`Instruction` pointer referencing the parent object, unlike `Function`s or
`Instruction`s themselves that can be created without a parent. It leads to a
rather complex flow in operation construction where one has to create the
operation first before being able to work with its regions. It may be
necessary to work with the regions before the operation is created. In
particular, in `build` and `parse` functions that are executed _before_ the
operation is created in cases where boilerplate region manipulation is required
(for example, inserting the hypothetical default terminator in affine regions).
Allow creating standalone regions. Such regions are meant to own a list of
blocks and transfer them to other regions on demand.
Each instruction stores a fixed number of regions as trailing objects and has
ownership of them. This decreases the size of the Instruction object for the
common case of instructions without regions. Keep this behavior intact. To
allow some flexibility in construction, make OperationState store an owning
vector of regions. When the Builder creates an Instruction from
OperationState, the bodies of the regions are transferred into the
instruction-owned regions to minimize copying. Thus, it becomes possible to
fill standalone regions with blocks and move them to an operation when it is
constructed, or move blocks from a region to an operation region, e.g., for
inlining.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240368183
a pointer. This makes it consistent with all the other methods in
FunctionPass, as well as with ModulePass::getModule(). NFC.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240257910
This combined match/rewrite functionality allows simplifying the majority of existing RewritePatterns, as they do not benefit from separate match and rewrite functions.
Some of the existing canonicalization patterns in StandardOps have been modified to take advantage of this functionality.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240187856
Previously we have multiple mechanisms to specify op definition and match constraints:
TypeConstraint, AttributeConstraint, Type, Attr, mAttr, mAttrAnyOf, mPat. These variants
are not added because there are so many distinct cases we need to model; essentially,
they are all carrying a predicate. It's just an artifact of implementation.
It's quite confusing for users to grasp these variants and choose among them. Instead,
as the OpBase TableGen file, we need to strike to provide an unified mechanism. Each
dialect has the flexibility to define its own aliases if wanted.
This CL removes mAttr, mAttrAnyOf, mPat. A new base class, Constraint, is added. Now
TypeConstraint and AttrConstraint derive from Constraint. Type and Attr further derive
from TypeConstraint and AttrConstraint, respectively.
Comments are revised and examples are added to make it clear how to use constraints.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240125076
Dialect implementer are expected to inherit from this class when implementing their types. It does not seems right when using MLIR "from the outside" to use directly something from `mlir::detail::`.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240075769
inherited constructors, which is cleaner and means you can now use DimOp()
to get a null op, instead of having to use Instruction::getNull<DimOp>().
This removes another 200 lines of code.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240068113
This should probably be changed to instead use the negated form (e.g., get predicate + negate it + get resulting template), but this fixes it locally.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240067116
Using global constructors should not be mandatory when possible, clients should be able to register a dialect explicitly when they want.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240064244
We just need a way to unpack ArrayRef<ValueHandle> to ArrayRef<Value*>.
No need to expose this to the user.
This reduces the cognitive overhead for the tutorial.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 240037425
tblgen be non-const. This requires introducing some const_cast's at the
moment, but those (and lots more stuff) will disappear in subsequent patches.
This significantly simplifies those patches because the various tblgen op emitters
get adjusted.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 239954566
Enable users specifying operand type constraint combinations (e.g., considering multiple operands). Some of these will be refactored (particularly the OpBase change and that should also not be needed to be done by most users), but the focus is more on user side (shown in test). The generated code for this does not take any known facts into account or perform any simplification.
Start with 2 primities to specify 1) whether an operand has a specific element type, and 2) whether an operand's element type matches another operands element type.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 239875712
This CL revisits the composition of AffineApplyOp for the special case where a symbol
itself comes from an AffineApplyOp.
This is achieved by rewriting such symbols into dims to allow composition to occur mathematically.
The implementation is also refactored to improve readability.
Rationale for locally rewriting symbols as dims:
================================================
The mathematical composition of AffineMap must always concatenate symbols
because it does not have enough information to do otherwise. For example,
composing `(d0)[s0] -> (d0 + s0)` with itself must produce
`(d0)[s0, s1] -> (d0 + s0 + s1)`.
The result is only equivalent to `(d0)[s0] -> (d0 + 2 * s0)` when
applied to the same mlir::Value* for both s0 and s1.
As a consequence mathematical composition of AffineMap always concatenates
symbols.
When AffineMaps are used in AffineApplyOp however, they may specify
composition via symbols, which is ambiguous mathematically. This corner case
is handled by locally rewriting such symbols that come from AffineApplyOp
into dims and composing through dims.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 239791597
This also eliminates some incorrect reinterpret_cast logic working around it, and numerous const-incorrect issues (like block argument iteration).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 239712029