Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dehao Chen 65dd23e273 Add LiveRangeShrink pass to shrink live range within BB.
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.

Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb

Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb

Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563

llvm-svn: 302938
2017-05-12 19:29:27 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 0429b1a431 [x86] regenerate checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 298166
2017-03-17 23:04:18 +00:00
Florian Hahn 6406f98342 [legalize-types] Remove stale entries from SoftenedFloats.
Summary:
When replacing a SDValue, we should remove the replaced value from
SoftenedFloats (and possibly the other maps as well?).

When we revisit a Node because it needs analyzing again, we have to
remove all result values from SoftenedFloats (and possibly other maps?).

This fixes the fp128 test failures with expensive checks for X86.

I think we probably should also remove the values from the other maps
(PromotedIntegers and so on), let me know what you think.

Reviewers: baldrick, bogner, davidxl, ab, arsenm, pirama, chh, RKSimon

Reviewed By: chh

Subscribers: danalbert, wdng, srhines, hfinkel, sepavloff, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29265

llvm-svn: 296964
2017-03-04 12:00:35 +00:00
Taewook Oh 96c6415697 [DAGCombiner] Fix DebugLoc propagation when folding !(x cc y) -> (x !cc y)
Summary:
Currently, when 't1: i1 = setcc t2, t3, cc' followed by 't4: i1 = xor t1, Constant:i1<-1>' is folded into 't5: i1 = setcc t2, t3 !cc', SDLoc of newly created SDValue 't5' follows SDLoc of 't4', not 't1'. However, as the opcode of newly created SDValue is 'setcc', it make more sense to take DebugLoc from 't1' than 't4'. For the code below

```
extern int bar();
extern int baz();

int foo(int x, int y) {
  if (x != y)
    return bar();
  else
    return baz();
}
```

, following is the bitcode representation of 'foo' at the end of llvm-ir level optimization:

```
define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y) !dbg !4 {
entry:
  tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %x, i64 0, metadata !9, metadata !11), !dbg !12
  tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %y, i64 0, metadata !10, metadata !11), !dbg !13
  %cmp = icmp ne i32 %x, %y, !dbg !14
  br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else, !dbg !16

if.then:                                          ; preds = %entry
  %call = tail call i32 (...) @bar() #3, !dbg !17
  br label %return, !dbg !18

if.else:                                          ; preds = %entry
  %call1 = tail call i32 (...) @baz() #3, !dbg !19
  br label %return, !dbg !20

return:                                           ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
  %retval.0 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.then ], [ %call1, %if.else ]
  ret i32 %retval.0, !dbg !21
}

!14 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 9, scope: !15)
!16 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 7, scope: !4)

```

As you can see, in 'entry' block, 'icmp' instruction and 'br' instruction have different debug locations. However, with current implementation, there's no distinction between debug locations of these two when they are lowered to asm instructions. This is because 'icmp' and 'br' become 'setcc' 'xor' and 'brcond' in SelectionDAG, where SDLoc of 'setcc' follows the debug location of 'icmp' but SDLOC of 'xor' and 'brcond' follows the debug location of 'br' instruction, and SDLoc of 'xor' overwrites SDLoc of 'setcc' when they are folded. This patch addresses this issue.

Reviewers: atrick, bogner, andreadb, craig.topper, aprantl

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: jlebar, mkuper, jholewinski, andreadb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29813

llvm-svn: 296825
2017-03-02 21:58:35 +00:00
Chih-Hung Hsieh 7993e18e80 [X86] Part 2 to fix x86-64 fp128 calling convention.
Part 1 was submitted in http://reviews.llvm.org/D15134.
Changes in this part:
* X86RegisterInfo.td, X86RecognizableInstr.cpp: Add FR128 register class.
* X86CallingConv.td: Pass f128 values in XMM registers or on stack.
* X86InstrCompiler.td, X86InstrInfo.td, X86InstrSSE.td:
  Add instruction selection patterns for f128.
* X86ISelLowering.cpp:
  When target has MMX registers, configure MVT::f128 in FR128RegClass,
  with TypeSoftenFloat action, and custom actions for some opcodes.
  Add missed cases of MVT::f128 in places that handle f32, f64, or vector types.
  Add TODO comment to support f128 type in inline assembly code.
* SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp:
  Fix infinite loop when f128 type can have
  VT == TLI.getTypeToTransformTo(Ctx, VT).
* Add unit tests for x86-64 fp128 type.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11438

llvm-svn: 255558
2015-12-14 22:08:36 +00:00