As described on PR31712, we miss a variety of legalization combines because we lower these to X86ISD::VSEXT/VZEXT despite them having the same functionality. This patch makes 128-bit (SSE41) SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG ops legal, adds the necessary tablegen plumbing and uses a helper 'getExtendInVec' to decide when to use SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG or VSEXT/VZEXT.
We're missing a couple of shuffle combines that will be added in a future patch for review.
Later patches can then support the AVX2 cases as a mixture of SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND and SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG, and then finally deal with the AVX512 cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30549
llvm-svn: 296985
Similar was already done for several other shuffles in this function.
The test changes are because the old code used explicity zeroing for elements that could have been undef.
While I was here I also changed other shuffle vectors in the same function to use the same input twice instead of creating UNDEF nodes. getVectorShuffle can create the UNDEF for us.
llvm-svn: 294130
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
We were failing to extract a constant splat shift value if the shifted value was being masked.
The (shl (and (setcc) N01CV) N1CV) -> (and (setcc) N01CV<<N1CV) combine was unnecessarily preventing this.
llvm-svn: 286454
This doesn't cover all combines in DAGCombiner::visitSRL/visitSHL yet, but identifies several cases where we fail to combine vectors (or non-splatted) vectors
llvm-svn: 284518
Simon Pilgrim