Summary:
Archives can contain multiple members with the same name. This would
cause ThinLTO links to fail ("Expected at most one ThinLTO module per
bitcode file"). This change implements the same strategy we use in
the ELF linker: make the offset in the archive part of the module
name so that names are unique.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini, ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60549
llvm-svn: 358440
Summary:
r338767 updated the COFF and wasm linker SymbolTable code to be
strutured more like the ELF linker's. That inadvertedly changed the
behavior of the COFF linker so that lazy symbols would be marked as
used in regular objects. This change adds an overload of the insert()
function, similar to the ELF linker, which does not perform that
marking.
Reviewers: ruiu, rnk, hans
Subscribers: aheejin, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51720
llvm-svn: 341585
Noticed while testing for an out of tree target. There are probably more tests that should be so marked.
I'm not sure who owns these tests so I've added a few names I recognise from the recent history.
With advice from probinson, ruiu, rafael and dramatically improved by davidb. Thank you all!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34685
llvm-svn: 308335
Summary: In the ELF linker, we create the buffer identifier for bitcode files by appending the object name to the archive name. This change makes the COFF linker do the same. Without the change, ThinLTO builds can fail with an error message about multiple ThinLTO modules per object file, caused by object files contained in different archives having the same name.
Reviewers: pcc, ruiu
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31402
llvm-svn: 298942
Amy Huang