Commit Graph

436 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song e47bbd28f8 [ELF] Make MergeInputSection merging aware of output sections
Fixes PR38748

mergeSections() calls getOutputSectionName() to get output section
names. Two MergeInputSections may be merged even if they are made
different by SECTIONS commands.

This patch moves mergeSections() after processSectionCommands() and
addOrphanSections() to fix the issue. The new pass is renamed to
OutputSection::finalizeInputSections().

processSectionCommands() and addorphanSections() are changed to add
sections to InputSectionDescription::sectionBases.

finalizeInputSections() merges MergeInputSections and migrates
`sectionBases` to `sections`.

For the -r case, we drop an optimization that tries keeping sh_entsize
non-zero. This is for the simplicity of addOrphanSections(). The
updated merge-entsize2.s reflects the change.

Reviewed By: grimar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67504

llvm-svn: 372734
2019-09-24 11:48:31 +00:00
Fangrui Song 520bdf79b5 [ELF] Fix spell corrector: don't call elf::InputFile::getSymbols() on shared objects
Exposed by pr34872.s

llvm-svn: 370875
2019-09-04 11:02:58 +00:00
Fangrui Song b4745fad24 [ELF] Add a spell corrector for "undefined symbol" diagnostics
Non-undefined symbols with Levenshtein distance 1 or a transposition are
suggestion candidates. This is probably good enough and it can suggest
some missing/superfluous qualifiers: const, restrict, volatile, & and &&
ref-qualifier, e.g.

   error: undefined symbol: foo(int*)
   >>> referenced by b.o:(.text+0x1)
  +>>> did you mean: foo(int const*)
  +>>> defined in: a.o

   error: undefined symbol: foo(int*&)
   >>> referenced by b.o:(.text+0x1)
  +>>> did you mean: foo(int*)
  +>>> defined in: b.o

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67039

llvm-svn: 370853
2019-09-04 09:04:26 +00:00
Fangrui Song debcac9fef [ELF] Make LinkerScript::assignAddresses iterative
PR42990. For `SECTIONS { b = a; . = 0xff00 + (a >> 8); a = .; }`,
we currently set st_value(a)=0xff00 while st_value(b)=0xffff.

The following call tree demonstrates the problem:

```
link<ELF64LE>(Args);
  Script->declareSymbols(); // insert a and b as absolute Defined
  Writer<ELFT>().run();
    Script->processSectionCommands();
      addSymbol(cmd);       // a and b are re-inserted. LinkerScript::getSymbolValue
                            // is lazily called by subsequent evaluation
    finalizeSections();
      forEachRelSec(scanRelocations<ELFT>);
        processRelocAux     // another problem PR42506, not affected by this patch
      finalizeAddressDependentContent(); // loop executed once
        script->assignAddresses(); // a = 0, b = 0xff00
    script->assignAddresses(); // a = 0xff00, _end = 0xffff
```

We need another assignAddresses() to finalize the value of `a`.

This patch

1) modifies assignAddress() to track the original section/value of each
  symbol and return a symbol whose section/value has changed.
2) moves the post-finalizeSections assignAddress() inside the loop
  of finalizeAddressDependentContent() and makes it iterative.
  Symbol assignment may not converge so we make a few attempts before
  bailing out.

Note, assignAddresses() must be called at least twice. The penultimate
call finalized section addresses while the last finalized symbol values.
It is somewhat obscure and there was no comment.
linkerscript/addr-zero.test tests this.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66279

llvm-svn: 369889
2019-08-26 10:23:31 +00:00
Fangrui Song ec4540d8a6 [ELF] Simplify processRelocAux and allow a corner-case error
After D66007/r369262, if the control flow reaches `if (sym.isUndefined())`, we know:

* The relocation is not a link-time constant => symbol is preemptable => Undefined or SharedSymbol
* Not an undef weak.
* -no-pie.
* The symbol type is neither STT_OBJECT nor STT_FUNC.

ld.lld --export-dynamic --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all %t.o can satisfy
these conditions. Delete the isUndefined() test so that we error
`symbol '...' has no type`, because we don't know the type to make the
decision to create copy relocation/canonical PLT.

llvm-svn: 369271
2019-08-19 15:52:29 +00:00
Fangrui Song ac0e6c6502 [ELF] Move (copy relocation/canonical PLT) before error checking
In processRelocAux(), we handle errors before copy relocation/canonical PLT.
This makes error checking a bit complex because we have to check for
conditions that will be allowed by copy relocation/canonical PLT.

Instead, move copy relocation/canonical PLT before error checking. This
simplifies the previous clumsy error checking code

`config->shared || (config->pie && expr == R_ABS && type != target->symbolicRel)`

to the simple `config->isPic`. Some diagnostics can be reported in
different ways. The code motion changes diagnostics for some contrived
test cases:

* copy-rel-pie-error.s -> copy-rel-pie2.s:
  It was rejected before but accepted now. ld.bfd also accepts the case.
* copy-errors.s: "cannot preempt symbol" changes to "symbol 'bar' has no type"
* got32{,x}-i386.s: the suggestion changes from "-fPIC or -Wl,-z,notext" to "-fPIE"
* x86-64-dyn-rel-error5.s: one diagnostic changes for -pie case

Reviewed By: peter.smith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66007

llvm-svn: 369262
2019-08-19 14:30:12 +00:00
Fangrui Song 7ca1e0c825 [ELF][Hexagon] Replace R_HEXAGON_GOT with R_GOTPLT
R_GOTPLT is relative to .got.plt since D59594. Since R_HEXAGON_GOT
relocations always have 0 r_addend, they can use R_GOTPLT instead.

Reviewed By: sidneym

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66274

llvm-svn: 369128
2019-08-16 17:01:56 +00:00
Fangrui Song dc06b0bc9a [ELF] Don't special case symbolic relocations with 0 addend to ifunc in writable locations
Currently the following 3 relocation types do not trigger the creation
of a canonical PLT (which changes STT_GNU_IFUNC to STT_FUNC and
redirects all references):

1) GOT-generating (`needsGot`)
2) PLT-generating (`needsPlt`)
3) R_ABS with 0 addend in a writable location. This is used for
  for ifunc function pointers in writable sections such as .data and .toc.

This patch deletes case 3) to simplify the R_*_IRELATIVE generating
logic added in D57371. Other advantages:

* It is guaranteed no more than 1 R_*_IRELATIVE is created for an ifunc.
* PPC64: no need to special case ifunc in toc-indirect to toc-relative relaxation. See D65755

The deleted elf::addIRelativeRelocs demonstrates that one-pass scan
through relocations makes several optimizations difficult. This is
something we can think about in the future.

Reviewed By: peter.smith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65995

llvm-svn: 368661
2019-08-13 09:43:40 +00:00
Fangrui Song 3cafdfddcb [ELF] Remove unnecessary assignment to `isPreemptible` in replaceWithDefined()
After r368535, it is no longer used in the handling of VER_NDX_LOCAL.
Drop it.

llvm-svn: 368550
2019-08-12 10:01:17 +00:00
Fangrui Song cfdd4589f1 [ELF] Remove redundant isDefined() in Symbol::computeBinding() and delete one redundant call site
After r367869, VER_NDX_LOCAL can only be assigned to Defined and
CommonSymbol.  CommonSymbol becomes Defined after replaceCommonSymbols(),
thus `versionId == VER_NDX_LOCAL` will imply `isDefined()`.

In maybeReportUndefined(), computeBinding() is called when the symbol is
unknown to be Undefined. computeBinding() != STB_LOCAL will always be
true.

llvm-svn: 368536
2019-08-11 17:03:00 +00:00
Fangrui Song 38c5788548 [ELF] Remove unnecessary assignment to `used` in replaceWithDefined
`Symbol::used` is used by Undefined and SharedSymbol to record if a
.symtab entry is needed. It is of no use for Defined.

llvm-svn: 368533
2019-08-11 13:32:46 +00:00
Fangrui Song 3d51d4ed6d [ELF] Detemplate maybeReportUndefined and copySectionsIntoPartitions
llvm-svn: 367117
2019-07-26 14:57:53 +00:00
Fangrui Song 47cfe8f321 [ELF] Fix variable names in comments after VariableName -> variableName change
Also fix some typos.

llvm-svn: 366181
2019-07-16 05:50:45 +00:00
Rui Ueyama 136d27ab4d [Coding style change][lld] Rename variables for non-ELF ports
This patch does the same thing as r365595 to other subdirectories,
which completes the naming style change for the entire lld directory.

With this, the naming style conversion is complete for lld.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64473

llvm-svn: 365730
2019-07-11 05:40:30 +00:00
Rui Ueyama 3837f4273f [Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.

Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.

I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.

Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.

clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:

1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.

Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121

llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
Rui Ueyama 11ae59f0ce Avoid identifiers that are different only in case. NFC.
Some variables in lld have the same name as functions ignoring case.
This patch gives them different names, so that my next patch is easier
to read.

llvm-svn: 365003
2019-07-03 06:11:50 +00:00
Fangrui Song ddc57afab9 [ELF][RISCV] Support GD/LD/IE/LE TLS models
RISC-V psABI doesn't specify TLS relaxation. It can be handled the same
way as we handle ARM TLS. RISC-V TLS is even simpler because GD/LD use
the same relocation type.

Reviewed By: jrtc27, ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63220

llvm-svn: 364813
2019-07-01 17:12:26 +00:00
Fangrui Song ba51fd5664 Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded
This restores r361830 "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded"
and dependent commits (r362218, r362497) which were reverted by r364321, with a fix of a --gdb-index issue.

.rela.debug_ranges contains relocations of range list entries:

    // start address of a range list entry
    // old: 0; after r361830: 0
    00000000000033a0 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + 0
    // end address of a range list entry
    // old: 0xe; after r361830: 0
    00000000000033a8 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + e

If both start and end addresses of a range list entry resolve to 0,
DWARFDebugRangeList::isEndOfListEntry() will return true, then the
.debug_range decoding loop will terminate prematurely:

    while (true) {
      decode StartAddress
      decode EndAddress
      if (Entry.isEndOfListEntry()) // prematurely
        break;
      Entries.push_back(Entry);
    }

In lld/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp, readAddressAreas() will read
incomplete address ranges and the resulting .gdb_index will be
incomplete. For files that gdb hasn't loaded their debug info, gdb uses
.gdb_index to map addresses to CUs. The absent entries make gdb fail to
symbolize some addresses.

To address this issue, we simply allow relocations to undefined symbols
in DWARF.cpp:findAux() and let RelocationResolver resolve them.

This patch should fix:

[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067

llvm-svn: 364391
2019-06-26 08:09:08 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 36c23cad15 Revert r362743 "Revert "Revert "Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded"""
(In effect, reverting "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded".)

It caused debug info problems in LibreOffice [1] and Chromium/V8 [2].
Reverting until those can be fixed.

It also reverts r362497 "STT_SECTION symbol should be defined" on .eh_frame, .debug*, .zdebug* and .gcc_except_table"
which was landed as a follow-up to the above.

> With -r or --emit-relocs, we warn `STT_SECTION symbol should be defined`
> on relocations to discarded section symbol. This was added as an error
> in rLLD319404, but was not so effective before D61583 (it turned the
> error to a warning).
>
> Relocations from .eh_frame .debug* .zdebug* .gcc_except_table to
> discarded .text are very common and somewhat expected. Don't warn/error
> on them. As a reference, ld.bfd has a similar logic in
> _bfd_elf_default_action_discarded() to allow these cases.
>
> Delete invalid-undef-section-symbol.test because what it intended to
> check is now covered by the updated comdat-discarded-reloc.s
>
> Delete relocatable-eh-frame.s because we allow relocations from
> .eh_frame as a special case now.

And finally it reverts r362218 "[ELF] Replace a dead test in getSymVA() with assert()"
as that also depended on the main change reverted here.

> Symbols relative to discarded comdat sections are Undefined instead of
> Defined now (after D59649 and D61583). The `== &InputSection::Discarded`
> test becomes dead. I cannot find a test related to this behavior.

 [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html
 [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067

llvm-svn: 364321
2019-06-25 14:58:46 +00:00
Nico Weber 2c45043415 lld/elf: Deduplicate undefined symbol diagnostics
Before:

```
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: f()
>>> referenced by test.cc:3
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-9c0808.o:(g())

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: f()
>>> referenced by test.cc:4
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-9c0808.o:(h())

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: f()
>>> referenced by test.cc:5
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-9c0808.o:(j())

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: k()
>>> referenced by test.cc:5
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-9c0808.o:(j())

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: f()
>>> referenced by test2.cc:2
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test2-07b391.o:(asdf())
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```

Now:

```
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: f()
>>> referenced by test.cc:3
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-0e07ba.o:(g())
>>> referenced by test.cc:4
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-0e07ba.o:(h())
>>> referenced by test.cc:5
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-0e07ba.o:(j())
>>> referenced by test2.cc:2
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test2-6bdb24.o:(asdf())

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: k()
>>> referenced by test.cc:5
>>>               /var/folders/c5/8d7sdn1x2mg92mj0rndghhdr0000gn/T/test-0e07ba.o:(j())
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```

If there are more than 10 references to an undefined symbol, only the
first 10 are printed.

Fixes PR42260.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63344

llvm-svn: 363962
2019-06-20 18:25:57 +00:00
Fangrui Song 249fde8583 [ELF][ARM][AARCH64][MIPS][PPC] Simplify the logic to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types in writable sections
Summary:
Our rule to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types were
loose. D63121 made it stricter but it failed to create R_*_RELATIVE for
R_ARM_TARGET1 and R_PPC64_TOC. rLLD363236 worked around that by
reinstating the original behavior for ARM and PPC64.

This patch is an attempt to simplify the logic.

Note, in ld.bfd, R_ARM_TARGET2 --target2=abs also creates
R_ARM_RELATIVE. This seems a very uncommon scenario (moreover,
--target2=got-rel is the default), so I do not implement any logic
related to it.

Also, delete R_AARCH64_ABS32 from AArch64::getDynRel. We don't have
working ILP32 support yet. Allowing it would create an incorrect
R_AARCH64_RELATIVE.

For MIPS, the (if SymbolRel, then RelativeRel) code is to keep its
behavior unchanged.

Note, in ppc64-abs64-dyn.s, R_PPC64_TOC gets an incorrect addend because
computeAddend() doesn't compute the correct address. We seem to have the
wrong behavior for a long time. The important thing seems that a dynamic
relocation R_PPC64_TOC should not be created as the dynamic loader will
error R_PPC64_TOC is not supported.

Reviewers: atanasyan, grimar, peter.smith, ruiu, sfertile, espindola

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63383

llvm-svn: 363928
2019-06-20 14:00:08 +00:00
Fangrui Song ffed2c96d9 [ELF][ARM] Merge handleARMTlsRelocation() into handleTlsRelocation()
ARM and RISC-V do not support TLS relaxations. However, for General
Dynamic and Local Dynamic models, if we are producing an executable and
the symbol is non-preemptable, we know it must be defined and the
R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32/R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD{32,64} dynamic relocation can be
omitted because it is always 1. This may be necessary for static linking
as DTPMOD may not be expected at load time.

Merge handleARMTlsRelocation() into handleTlsRelocation(). This requires
more logic to R_TLSGD_PC and R_TLSLD_PC. Because we use SymbolicRel to
resolve the relocation at link time, R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 can be deleted
from relocateOne(). It cannot be used as a static relocation type.

As a bonus, the additional logic in R_TLSGD_PC code can be shared by the
TLS support for RISC-V (D63220).

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63333

llvm-svn: 363927
2019-06-20 13:53:11 +00:00
Nico Weber 96a15796fb Remove two unused parameters
llvm-svn: 363419
2019-06-14 16:46:02 +00:00
Fangrui Song e05ca38101 [ELF] Don't emit dynamic relocations with weak undef in writable sections
In processRelocAux(), our handling of 1) link-time constant and 2) weak
undef is the same, so put them together to simplify the logic.

This moves the weak undef code around. The result is that: in a writable
section (or -z notext), we will no longer emit dynamic relocations for
weak undefined symbols.

The new behavior seems to match GNU linkers, and improves consistency
with the case of a readonly section.

The condition `!Config->Shared` was there probably because it is common
for a -shared link not to specify full dependencies. Keep it now but we
may revisit the decision in the future.

gABI says:

> The behavior of weak symbols in areas not specified by this document is
> implementation defined. Weak symbols are intended primarily for use in
> system software. Applications using weak symbols are unreliable since
> changes in the runtime environment might cause the execution to fail.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63003

llvm-svn: 363399
2019-06-14 14:09:15 +00:00
Fangrui Song a78e025558 [ELF] Loosen the condition that changes absolute relocation types to relative relocations for ARM and PPC64
Try fixing build bots after D63121

llvm-svn: 363236
2019-06-13 08:45:22 +00:00
Fangrui Song 4ce0a519c1 [ELF][RISCV] Treat R_RISCV_{ADD,SET,SUB}* as link-time constants
R_RISCV_{ADD,SET,SUB}* are used for local label computation.
Add a new RelExpr member R_RISCV_ADD to represent them.

R_RISCV_ADD is treated as a link-time constant because otherwise
R_RISCV_{ADD,SET,SUB}* are not allowed in -pie/-shared mode.
In glibc Scrt1.o, .rela.eh_frame contains such relocations.
Because .eh_frame is not writable, we get this error:

    ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_RISCV_ADD32 against symbol: .L0 in readonly segment; recompil object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output
    >>> defined in ..../riscv64-linux-gnu/lib/Scrt1.o

With D63076 and this patch, I can run -pie/-shared programs linked against glibc.

Note llvm-mc cannot currently produce R_RISCV_SET* so they are not tested.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63183

llvm-svn: 363128
2019-06-12 07:53:06 +00:00
Fangrui Song 11549e5c46 [ELF][PPC64] Don't report "relocation refers to a discarded section" for .toc
Summary:
clang (as of 2019-06-12) / gcc (as of 8.2.1) PPC64 may emit a .rela.toc
which references an embedded switch table in a discarded .rodata/.text
section. The .toc and the .rela.toc are incorrectly not placed in the
comdat.

Technically a relocation from outside the group is not allowed by the ELF spec:

> A symbol table entry with STB_LOCAL binding that is defined relative
> to one of a group's sections, and that is contained in a symbol table
> section that is not part of the group, must be discarded if the group
> members are discarded. References to this symbol table entry from
> outside the group are not allowed.

Don't report errors to work around the bug.

This should fix the ppc64le-lld-multistage-test bot while linking llvm-tblgen:

    ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .rodata._ZNK4llvm3MVT13getSizeInBitsEv
    >>> defined in utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o
    >>> referenced by CodeGenRegisters.cpp
    >>> utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o:(.toc+0x0)

Some other PPC specific sections may have similar problems. We can blacklist more
section names when problems occur.

    // A simple program that reproduces the bug.
    // Note .rela.toc (outside the group) references a section symbol (STB_LOCAL) in a group.
    void puts(const char *);
    struct A {
      void foo(int a) {
        switch (a) {
        case 0: puts("0"); break;
        case 1: puts("1"); puts("1"); break;
        case 2: puts("2"); break;
        case 3: puts("3"); puts("4"); break;
        case 4: puts("4"); break;
        case 5: puts("5"); puts("5"); break;
        case 6: puts("6"); break;
        }
      }
      int a;
    };
    void foo(A x) { x.foo(x.a); }

Reviewers: ruiu, sfertile, espindola

Reviewed By: ruiu

Subscribers: emaste, nemanjai, arichardson, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63182

llvm-svn: 363126
2019-06-12 07:35:42 +00:00
Fangrui Song 47d77365aa [ELF][RISCV] Add R_RISCV_PC_INDIRECT to isRelExpr()
So that R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_[IS] are considered as link-time constants in
-pie mode, otherwise there are bogus errors:

    ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I against symbol: .L0  in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63123

llvm-svn: 363064
2019-06-11 13:39:08 +00:00
Fangrui Song 025a815d75 [ELF] Make the rule to create relative relocations in a writable section stricter
The current rule is loose: `!Sym.IsPreemptible || Expr == R_GOT`.

When the symbol is non-preemptable, this allows absolute relocation
types with smaller numbers of bits, e.g. R_X86_64_{8,16,32}. They are
disallowed by ld.bfd and gold, e.g.

    ld.bfd: a.o: relocation R_X86_64_8 against `.text' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

This patch:

a) Add TargetInfo::SymbolicRel to represent relocation types that resolve to a
symbol value (e.g. R_AARCH_ABS64, R_386_32, R_X86_64_64).

  As a side benefit, we currently (ab)use GotRel (R_*_GLOB_DAT) to resolve
  GOT slots that are link-time constants. Since we now use Target->SymbolRel
  to do the job, we can remove R_*_GLOB_DAT from relocateOne() for all targets.
  R_*_GLOB_DAT cannot be used as static relocation types.
b) Change the condition to `!Sym.IsPreemptible && Type != Target->SymbolicRel || Expr == R_GOT`.

Some tests are caught by the improved error checking (ld.bfd/gold also
issue errors on them). Many misuse .long where .quad should be used
instead.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63121

llvm-svn: 363059
2019-06-11 12:59:30 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 0282898586 ELF: Create synthetic sections for loadable partitions.
We create several types of synthetic sections for loadable partitions, including:
- The dynamic symbol table. This allows code outside of the loadable partitions
  to find entry points with dlsym.
- Creating a dynamic symbol table also requires the creation of several other
  synthetic sections for the partition, such as the dynamic table and hash table
  sections.
- The partition's ELF header is represented as a synthetic section in the
  combined output file, and will be used by llvm-objcopy to extract partitions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62350

llvm-svn: 362819
2019-06-07 17:57:58 +00:00
Fangrui Song 32742d8f36 [ELF] Delete R_PPC64_CALL_PLT from isRelExpr()
It was added by D46654 but is actually never used.
R_PPC64_CALL_PLT (was: R_PPC_CALL_PLT) is a static link-time constant.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62994

llvm-svn: 362788
2019-06-07 11:09:33 +00:00
Sean Fertile 6ba76dd779 Revert "Revert "Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded""
This reverts commit 729111cf1824159bb4dd331cab8a829eab30313f.

Reverting the previous commit breaks other LLD buildbots.

llvm-svn: 362743
2019-06-06 20:16:53 +00:00
Sean Fertile f1d9b3180e Revert "Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded"
This reverts commit 5d3b3188f7.

Breaks the PowerPC multi-stage buildbot.

llvm-svn: 362739
2019-06-06 19:34:26 +00:00
Fangrui Song 82442adfc0 [PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port
Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl
should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate
their lib32 (PR40888).

* Fix default image base and max page size.
* Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not
  implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't
  support Secure PLT yet.
* Support more initial relocation types:
  R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16.
  The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type
  but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA.
* Support GNU ifunc
* Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc
* Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub.
  It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24.

A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to
.got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative
addresses).
Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub
can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility,
change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to
`const InputSection &, const Relocation &`.

PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both
writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments,
which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable.
This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to
address the security issue.

TLS will be implemented in D62940.

glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can
not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack
(not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to
work around the issue:

    if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) {
      // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt
      Add(In.RelaDyn);
      if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent)
        In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt);
    }

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464

llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
Fangrui Song 8522d579b8 [ELF][PPC64] Rename some PPC64 ELFv2 specific RelExpr from R_PPC_* to R_PPC64_*
The following abstract relocation types (RelExpr) are PPC64 ELFv2 ABI specific,
not used by PPC32. So rename them to prevent confusion when the PPC32 port is improved.

* R_PPC_CALL R_PPC_CALL_PLT:
  R_PPC_CALL_PLT represents R_PPC64_REL14 and R_PPC64_REL24.
  If the function is not preemptable, R_PPC_CALL_PLT can be optimized to R_PPC_CALL:
  the formula adjusts the symbol VA from the global entry point to the local entry point.
* R_PPC_TOC: represents R_PPC64_TOC.  We don't have a test. Add one to ppc64-relocs.s
  Rename it to R_PPC64_TOCBASE because `@tocbase` is the assembly form.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62800

llvm-svn: 362359
2019-06-03 06:21:33 +00:00
Fangrui Song ce1534b405 [ELF][PPC64] Don't apply LD->LE relaxation on R_PPC64_GOT_DTPREL16*
In ELF v2 ABI, R_PPC64_GOT_DTPREL16* are not relaxed.

This family of relocation types are used for variables outside of 2GiB
of the TLS block. 2 instructions cannot materialize a DTPREL offset that
is not 32-bit.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62737

llvm-svn: 362357
2019-06-03 05:41:31 +00:00
Peter Collingbourne 87575f6501 ELF: Don't reuse a thunk in a different loadable partition.
There's no guarantee that the other partition will be loaded, so it
can't be reused.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62365

llvm-svn: 361926
2019-05-29 04:06:01 +00:00
Fangrui Song 719322411c [ELF] Implement General Dynamic style TLSDESC for x86-64
This handles two initial relocation types R_X86_64_GOTPC32_TLSDESC and
R_X86_64_TLSDESC_CALL, as well as the GD->LE and GD->IE relaxations.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62513

llvm-svn: 361911
2019-05-29 02:03:56 +00:00
Fangrui Song 5d3b3188f7 Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded
This is implemented by creating Undefined (instead of Defined) for such
local STT_SECTION symbols. It allows us to catch errors when there are
relocations to such discarded sections (e.g. in PR41693, ld.bfd and gold
error but we don't). Updated comdat-discarded-error.s checks we emit
friendly error message.

For relocatable-eh-frame.s, ld.lld -r a.o a.o will now error
"STT_SECTION symbol should be defined" because the section .eh_frame
refers to is now an Undefined instead of a Defined.
So I have to change `error()` to `warn()` to retain the output.

rLLD361144 inadvertently enabled the error for --gdb-index
(in LLDDwarfObj<ELFT>::findAux()).

Relocations from .debug_info (not in comdat) to .text.* (in comdat) for
DW_AT_low_pc are common. If an .text.* was discarded, rLLD361144 would error,
which was unexpected. (Note, if we don't error as this patch does,
InputSection::relocateNonAlloc() will resolve such relocations).

llvm-svn: 361830
2019-05-28 14:34:28 +00:00
Haojian Wu 241dcb386e Revert [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded
This reverts r361792 (git commit cfca5095df), the
revision causes link errors internally, will share more details with the
author.

llvm-svn: 361806
2019-05-28 11:21:59 +00:00
Fangrui Song cfca5095df [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded
This is implemented by creating Undefined (instead of Defined) for such
local STT_SECTION symbols. It allows us to catch errors when there are
relocations to such discarded sections (e.g. in PR41693, ld.bfd and gold
error but we don't). Updated comdat-discarded-error.s checks we emit
friendly error message.

For relocatable-eh-frame.s, ld.lld -r a.o a.o will now error
"STT_SECTION symbol should be defined" because the section .eh_frame
refers to is now an Undefined instead of a Defined.
So I have to change `error()` to `warn()` to retain the output.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61583

llvm-svn: 361792
2019-05-28 06:34:52 +00:00
Fangrui Song b72b091389 [ELF] Improve error message for relocations to symbols defined in discarded sections
Rather than report "undefined symbol: ", give more informative message
about the object file that defines the discarded section.

In particular, PR41133, if the section is a discarded COMDAT, print the
section group signature and the object file with the prevailing
definition. This is useful to track down some ODR issues.

We need to
* add `uint32_t DiscardedSecIdx` to Undefined for this feature.
* make ComdatGroups public and change its type to DenseMap<CachedHashStringRef, const InputFile *>

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59649

llvm-svn: 361359
2019-05-22 09:06:42 +00:00
Fangrui Song 547e3e930c [ELF] Error on relocations to local undefined symbols
For a reference to a local symbol, ld.bfd and gold error if the symbol
is defined in a discarded section but accept it if the symbol is
undefined. This inconsistent behavior seems unnecessary for us (it
probably makes sense for them as they differentiate local/global
symbols, the error would mean more code).

Catch such errors. Symbol index 0 may be used by marker relocations,
e.g. R_*_NONE R_ARM_V4BX. Don't error on them.

The difference from D61563 (which caused msan failure) is we don't call
Sym.computeBinding() on local symbols - VersionId is uninitialized.

llvm-svn: 361213
2019-05-21 02:38:11 +00:00
Dmitri Gribenko 0429fddc9d Revert "[ELF] Error on relocations to local undefined symbols"
This reverts commit r361144.  It causes a use-of-uninitialized-value in
maybeReportUndefined at llvm/tools/lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp:682, as
detected by MemorySanitizer when local-undefined-symbol.s test is run.

llvm-svn: 361162
2019-05-20 15:04:08 +00:00
Fangrui Song 7c7425483a [ELF] Error on relocations to local undefined symbols
For a reference to a local symbol, ld.bfd and gold error if the symbol
is defined in a discarded section but accept it if the symbol is
undefined. This inconsistent behavior seems unnecessary for us (it
probably makes sense for them as they differentiate local/global
symbols, the error would mean more code).

Weaken the condition to getSymbol(Config->IsMips64EL) == 0 to catch such
errors. The symbol index can be 0 (e.g. R_*_NONE R_ARM_V4BX) and we shouldn't error on them.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61563

llvm-svn: 361144
2019-05-20 11:25:55 +00:00
Rui Ueyama faf541e1e1 Make replaceSymbol a member function of Symbol.
This is a mechanical rewrite of replaceSymbol(A, B) to A->replace(B).
I also added a comment to Symbol::replace().

Technically this change is not necessary, but this change makes code a
bit more concise.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62117

llvm-svn: 361123
2019-05-20 03:36:33 +00:00
Rui Ueyama bbf154cf9c Move symbol resolution code out of SymbolTable class.
This is the last patch of the series of patches to make it possible to
resolve symbols without asking SymbolTable to do so.

The main point of this patch is the introduction of
`elf::resolveSymbol(Symbol *Old, Symbol *New)`. That function resolves
or merges given symbols by examining symbol types and call
replaceSymbol (which memcpy's New to Old) if necessary.

With the new function, we have now separated symbol resolution from
symbol lookup. If you already have a Symbol pointer, you can directly
resolve the symbol without asking SymbolTable to do that.

Now that the nice abstraction become available, I can start working on
performance improvement of the linker. As a starter, I'm thinking of
making --{start,end}-lib faster.

--{start,end}-lib is currently unnecessarily slow because it looks up
the symbol table twice for each symbol.

 - The first hash table lookup/insertion occurs when we instantiate a
   LazyObject file to insert LazyObject symbols.

 - The second hash table lookup/insertion occurs when we create an
   ObjFile from LazyObject file. That overwrites LazyObject symbols
   with Defined symbols.

I think it is not too hard to see how we can now eliminate the second
hash table lookup. We can keep LazyObject symbols in Step 1, and then
call elf::resolveSymbol() to do Step 2.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61898

llvm-svn: 360975
2019-05-17 01:55:20 +00:00
Rui Ueyama 7d4761928e Simplify SymbolTable::add{Defined,Undefined,...} functions.
SymbolTable's add-family functions have lots of parameters because
when they have to create a new symbol, they forward given arguments
to Symbol's constructors. Therefore, the functions take at least as
many arguments as their corresponding constructors.

This patch simplifies the add-family functions. Now, the functions
take a symbol instead of arguments to construct a symbol. If there's
no existing symbol, a given symbol is memcpy'ed to the symbol table.
Otherwise, the functions attempt to merge the existing and a given
new symbol.

I also eliminated `CanOmitFromDynSym` parameter, so that the functions
take really one argument.

Symbol classes are trivially constructible, so looks like constructing
them to pass to add-family functions is as cheap as passing a lot of
arguments to the functions. A quick benchmark showed that this patch
seems performance-neutral.

This is a preparation for
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131902.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61855

llvm-svn: 360838
2019-05-16 02:14:00 +00:00
Fangrui Song e041d15f5e [LLD][ELF] Add the -z ifunc-noplt option
Patch by Mark Johnston!

Summary:
When the option is configured, ifunc calls do not go through the PLT;
rather, they appear as regular function calls with relocations
referencing the ifunc symbol, and the resolver is invoked when
applying the relocation.  This is intended for use in freestanding
environments where text relocations are permissible and is incompatible
with the -z text option.  The option is motivated by ifunc usage in the
FreeBSD kernel, where ifuncs are used to elide CPU feature flag bit
checks in hot paths.  Instead of replacing the cost of a branch with that
of an indirect function call, the -z ifunc-noplt option is used to ensure
that ifunc calls carry no hidden overhead relative to normal function
calls.

Test Plan:
I added a couple of regression tests and tested the FreeBSD kernel
build using the latest lld sources.

To demonstrate the effects of the change, I used a micro-benchmark
which results in frequent invocations of a FreeBSD kernel ifunc.  The
benchmark was run with and without IBRS enabled, and with and without
-zifunc-noplt configured.  The observed speedup is small and consistent,
and is significantly larger with IBRS enabled:

https://people.freebsd.org/~markj/ifunc-noplt/noibrs.txt
https://people.freebsd.org/~markj/ifunc-noplt/ibrs.txt

Reviewed By: ruiu, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61613

llvm-svn: 360685
2019-05-14 15:25:21 +00:00
Fangrui Song 912251e82f [PPC64] toc-indirect to toc-relative relaxation
This is based on D54720 by Sean Fertile.

When accessing a global symbol which is not defined in the translation unit,
compilers will generate instructions that load the address from the toc entry.

If the symbol is defined, non-preemptable, and addressable with a 32-bit
signed offset from the toc pointer, the address can be computed
directly. e.g.

    addis 3, 2, .LC0@toc@ha  # R_PPC64_TOC16_HA
    ld    3, .LC0@toc@l(3)   # R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS, load the address from a .toc entry
    ld/lwa 3, 0(3)           # load the value from the address

    .section .toc,"aw",@progbits
    .LC0: .tc var[TC],var

can be relaxed to

    addis 3,2,var@toc@ha     # this may be relaxed to a nop,
    addi  3,3,var@toc@l      # then this becomes addi 3,2,var@toc
    ld/lwa 3, 0(3)           # load the value from the address

We can delete the test ppc64-got-indirect.s as its purpose is covered by
newly added ppc64-toc-relax.s and ppc64-toc-relax-constants.s

Reviewed By: ruiu, sfertile

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60958

llvm-svn: 360112
2019-05-07 04:26:05 +00:00