Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
James Molloy 9790d8f81d Revert "[Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently"
This reverts commit r281323. It caused chromium test failures and a selfhost failure.

llvm-svn: 281451
2016-09-14 09:45:28 +00:00
James Molloy d246c598de [Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).

1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.

1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.

llvm-svn: 281323
2016-09-13 12:12:32 +00:00
Nico Weber 7c31d0ebc0 Revert r281215, it caused PR30358.
llvm-svn: 281263
2016-09-12 21:40:50 +00:00
James Molloy 1e1b56bd48 [Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).

1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.

1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.

llvm-svn: 281215
2016-09-12 14:30:48 +00:00
James Molloy 0f41227b21 [Thumb1] Teach optimizeCompareInstr about thumb1 compares
This avoids us doing a completely unneeded "cmp r0, #0" after a flag-setting instruction if we only care about the Z or C flags.

Add LSL/LSR to the whitelist while we're here and add testing. This code could really do with a spring clean.

llvm-svn: 281027
2016-09-09 09:51:06 +00:00
Weiming Zhao 812fde3603 DAG: avoid duplicated truncating for sign extended operand
Summary:
When performing cmp for EQ/NE and the operand is sign extended, we can
avoid the truncaton if the bits to be tested are no less than origianl
bits.

Reviewers: eli.friedman

Subscribers: eli.friedman, aemerson, nemanjai, t.p.northover, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22933

llvm-svn: 277252
2016-07-29 23:33:48 +00:00
Artyom Skrobov 2aca0c622a [Thumb] Fix assembler error 'cannot honor width suffix pop {lr}'
Summary:
* avoid generating POP {LR} in Thumb1 epilogues
* combine MOV LR, Rx + BX LR -> BX Rx in a peephole optimization pass
* combine POP {LR} + B + BX LR -> POP {PC} on v5T+

Test cases by Ana Pazos

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15707

llvm-svn: 256523
2015-12-28 21:40:45 +00:00
Artyom Skrobov 0a37b80bcb Fix ARMv4T (Thumb1) epilogue generation
Summary:
Before ARMv5T, Thumb1 code could not pop PC, as described at D14357 and D14986;
so we need the special fixup in the epilogue.

Reviewers: jroelofs, qcolombet

Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15126

llvm-svn: 255047
2015-12-08 19:59:01 +00:00
Tim Northover 747ae9a7de ARM: make sure backend is consistent about exception handling method.
It turns out we decide whether to use SjLj exceptions or some alternative in
two separate places in the backend, and they disagreed with each other. This
led to inconsistent code and is generally a terrible idea.

So make them consistent and add an assert that they *do* match (unfortunately
MCAsmInfo isn't available in opt, so it can't be used to initialise the CodeGen
version directly).

llvm-svn: 253502
2015-11-18 21:10:39 +00:00
Quentin Colombet 48b772007f [ARM] Make the frame lowering code ready for shrink-wrapping.
Shrink-wrapping can now be tested on ARM with -enable-shrink-wrap.

Related to <rdar://problem/20821730>

llvm-svn: 242908
2015-07-22 16:34:37 +00:00