Summary:
Intel's i5-6300U CPU is reporting to have a model id of 78 (4e).
The Host detection assumes that to be Skylake Xeon (with AVX512 support),
instead of a normal Skylake machine.
Patch by: Valentin Churavy
Reviewers: nalimilan, craig.topper
Subscribers: hfinkel, tkelman, craig.topper, nalimilan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28221
llvm-svn: 291084
Set up basic YAML I/O support for module summaries, plumb the summary into
the pass and add a few command line flags to test YAML I/O support. Bitcode
support to come separately, as will the code in LowerTypeTests that actually
uses the summary. Also add a couple of tests that pass by virtue of the pass
doing nothing with the summary (which happens to be the correct thing to do
for those tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28041
llvm-svn: 291069
performing partial redundancy elimination (PRE). Not doing so can cause jumpy line
tables and confusing (though correct) source attributions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27857
llvm-svn: 291037
Summary:
This is a relatively simple scheme: we use the index emitted in the
bitcode to avoid loading all the global metadata. Instead we load
the index with their position in the bitcode so that we can load each
of them individually. Materializing the global metadata block in this
condition only triggers loading the named metadata, and the ones
referenced from there (transitively). When materializing a function,
metadata from the global block are loaded lazily as they are
referenced.
Two main current limitations are:
1) Global values other than functions are not materialized on demand,
so we need to eagerly load METADATA_GLOBAL_DECL_ATTACHMENT records
(and their transitive dependencies).
2) When we load a single metadata, we don't recurse on the operands,
instead we use a placeholder or a temporary metadata. Unfortunately
tepmorary nodes are very expensive. This is why we don't have it
always enabled and only for importing.
These two limitations can be lifted in a subsequent improvement if
needed.
With this change, the total link time of opt with ThinLTO and Debug
Info enabled is going down from 282s to 224s (~20%).
Reviewers: pcc, tejohnson, dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28113
llvm-svn: 291027
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
This recommits 291006, reverted in r291007.
llvm-svn: 291016
Summary:
When promoting fp-to-uint16 to fp-to-sint32, the result is actually zero
extended. For example, given double 65534.0, without legalization:
fp-to-uint16: 65534.0 -> 0xfffe
With the legalization:
fp-to-sint32: 65534.0 -> 0x0000fffe
Without this patch, legalization wrongly emits a signed extend assertion,
which is consumed by later icmp instruction, and cause miscompile.
Note that the floating point value must be in [0, 65535), otherwise the
behavior is undefined.
This patch reverts r279223 behavior and adds more tests and
documentations.
In PR29041's context, James Molloy mentioned that:
We don't need to mask because conversion from float->uint8_t is
undefined if the integer part of the float value is not representable in
uint8_t. Therefore we can assume this doesn't happen!
which is totally true and good, because fptoui is documented clearly to
have undefined behavior when overflow/underflow happens. We should take
the advantage of this behavior so that we can save unnecessary mask
instructions.
Reviewers: jmolloy, nadav, echristo, kbarton
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28284
llvm-svn: 291015
Summary:
Instead of matching:
(a + i) + 1 -> (a + i, undef, 1)
Now it matches:
(a + i) + 1 -> (a, i, 1)
Reviewers: rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D26367
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 291012
If this is a problem for anyone (shared_ptr is two pointers in size,
whereas IntrusiveRefCntPtr is 1 - and the ref count control block that
make_shared adds is probably larger than the one int in RefCountedBase)
I'd prefer to address this by adding a lower-overhead version of
shared_ptr (possibly refactoring IntrusiveRefCntPtr into such a thing)
to avoid the intrusiveness - this allows memory ownership to remain
orthogonal to types and at least to me, seems to make code easier to
understand (since no implicit ownership acquisition can happen).
llvm-svn: 291006
This change aims to unify and correct our logic for when we need to allow for
the possibility of the linker adding a TOC restoration instruction after a
call. This comes up in two contexts:
1. When determining tail-call eligibility. If we make a tail call (i.e.
directly branch to a function) then there is no place for the linker to add
a TOC restoration.
2. When determining when we need to add a nop instruction after a call.
Likewise, if there is a possibility that the linker might need to add a
TOC restoration after a call, then we need to put a nop after the call
(the bl instruction).
First problem: We were using similar, but different, logic to decide (1) and
(2). This is just wrong. Both the resideInSameModule function (used when
determining tail-call eligibility) and the isLocalCall function (used when
deciding if the post-call nop is needed) were supposed to be determining the
same underlying fact (i.e. might a TOC restoration be needed after the call).
The same logic should be used in both places.
Second problem: The logic in both places was wrong. We only know that two
functions will share the same TOC when both functions come from the same
section of the same object. Otherwise the linker might cause the functions to
use different TOC base addresses (unless the multi-TOC linker option is
disabled, in which case only shared-library boundaries are relevant). There are
a number of factors that can cause functions to be placed in different sections
or come from different objects (-ffunction-sections, explicitly-specified
section names, COMDAT, weak linkage, etc.). All of these need to be checked.
The existing logic only checked properties of the callee, but the properties of
the caller must also be checked (for example, calling from a function in a
COMDAT section means calling between sections).
There was a conceptual error in the resideInSameModule function in that it
allowed tail calls to functions with weak linkage and protected/hidden
visibility. While protected/hidden visibility does prevent the function
implementation from being replaced at runtime (via interposition), it does not
prevent the linker from using an alternate implementation at link time (i.e.
using some strong definition to replace the provided weak one during linking).
If this happens, then we're still potentially looking at a required TOC
restoration upon return.
Otherwise, in general, the post-call nop is needed wherever ELF interposition
needs to be supported. We don't currently support ELF interposition at the IR
level (see http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html
for more information), and I don't think we should try to make it appear to
work in the backend in spite of that fact. Unfortunately, because of the way
that the ABI works, we need to generate code as if we supported interposition
whenever the linker might insert stubs for the purpose of supporting it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27231
llvm-svn: 291003
This reapplies r289828 (reverted in r289833 as it broke the address sanitizer). The
debugloc is now only set when the instruction is not a call, as this causes the
verifier to assert (the inliner requires an inlinable callsite to have a debug loc
if the caller and callee have debug info).
Original commit message:
Simplify CFG will try to sink the last instruction in a series of basic blocks,
creating a "common" instruction in the successor block (sinkLastInstruction).
When it does this, the debug location of the single instruction should be the
merged debug locations of the commoned instructions.
Original review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27590
llvm-svn: 290973
This CPU type was not previously recognized by LLVM which led to emitting
poor (and sometimes incorrect) code in some JIT workloads on such a machine.
llvm-svn: 290961
Summary:
In mergeSPUpdates, debug values need to be ignored when getting the
previous element, otherwise debug data could have an impact on codegen.
In eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr, debug values after the erased element
could have an impact on codegen and should be skipped.
Closes PR31319 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31319)
Reviewers: aprantl, MatzeB, mkuper
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27688
llvm-svn: 290955
Summary:
The InlineSpiller was accessing the DominatorTreeBase directly
through the public data member DT in the MachineDominatorTree.
This is not a good idea as the "cached" information in
SplitCriticalEdges is not applied before the access.
The DominatorTreeBase must be accessed through the member
function getBase() in MachineDominatorTree.
The fault was introduced in r266162.
I think the public data member DT in the MachineDominatorTree
should have been made private in the original code (r215576)
that introduced the concept of lazily updating the
MachineDominatorTree information from
MachineBasicBlock::SplitCriticalEdge().
Patch by Karl-Johan Karlsson <karl-johan.karlsson@ericsson.com>
Reviewers: wmi, qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, bjope, uabelho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27983
llvm-svn: 290950
Replacing the memory operand in the intrinsic versions of the comis/ucomis instrucions from f128mem to ssmem/sdmem accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28138
llvm-svn: 290948
In some cases its more efficient to combine TRUNC( BINOP( X, Y ) ) --> BINOP( TRUNC( X ), TRUNC( Y ) ) if the binop is legal for the truncated types.
This is true for vector integer multiplication (especially vXi64), as well as ADD/AND/XOR/OR in cases where we only need to truncate one of the inputs at runtime (e.g. a duplicated input or an one use constant we can fold).
Further work could be done here - scalar cases (especially i64) could often benefit (if we avoid partial registers etc.), other opcodes, and better analysis of when truncating the inputs reduces costs.
I have considered implementing this for all targets within the DAGCombiner but wasn't sure we could devise a suitable cost model system that would give us the range we need.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28219
llvm-svn: 290947
We can perform the following:
(add (zext (add nuw X, C1)), C2) -> (zext (add nuw X, C1+C2))
This is only possible if C2 is negative and C2 is greater than or equal to negative C1.
llvm-svn: 290927
As per post-commit review for r289993 (D27775), we can only safely
import a type as a decl if it has an Identifier, as the Name alone
is not enough to be unique across modules.
llvm-svn: 290915
I wrote this patch before seeing the comment in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27114
...that suggests we should actually be canonicalizing the other way.
So just in case we decide this is the right way, we might as well
have a cleaner implementation.
llvm-svn: 290912
Use getReturnedArgOperand() instead of rolling our own. Note that it's
equivalent because there can only be one 'returned' operand.
The existing code was also incorrect: there already was awkward logic to
ignore callee/EH blocks, but operands can now also be operand bundles,
in which case we'll look for non-existent parameter attributes.
Unfortunately, this isn't observable in-tree, as it only crashes when
exercising the regular call lowering logic with operand bundles.
Still, this is a nice small cleanup anyway.
llvm-svn: 290905
Provide a distinct contents for semBogus and semPPCDoubleDouble in order
to prevent compilers from collapsing them to a single memory address,
while we heavily rely on every semantic having distinct address.
This happens if insecure optimization collapsing identical values is
enabled. As a result, APFloats of semBogus are indistinguishable from
semPPCDoubleDouble -- and whenever the move constructor is used, the old
value beings being incorrectly recognized as a semPPCDoubleDouble.
Since the values in semPPCDoubleDouble are not used anywhere,
we can easily solve this issue via altering the value of one of the
fields and therefore ensuring that the collapse can not occur.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28112
llvm-svn: 290896
Mohammed Agabaria