This is already handled by setting cxx_runtime_root instead -- I don't
see a reason to have two ways of setting the runtime path of the library
we're running against.
This commit removes minor features of the test suite that I've never
seen used and that are basically just a maintenance burden:
- color_diagnostics: Diagnostics are colored by default when running
from a terminal, and not colored otherwise. This is the right behavior.
Being able to tweak this has minor value, and could be achieved by
modifying the %{compile_flags} instead if absolutely needed.
- ccache: This can be achieved by using a wrapper for the %{cxx}
substitution.
- _dump_macros_verbose is just a dead function now.
Summary:
When I read this on the website it looks like the `--` in the used font turns
into an em dash. I updated this with inline literal mark up so the `--` will
remain obvious.
Reviewers: EricWF, #libc!
Subscribers: libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78405
When running the tests through `lit` directly instead of through `check-cxx`,
it is required to manually build the `cxx` (and often `cxx_experimental`)
targets. Instead of having to do that manually, this commit adds a new
target `check-cxx-deps` that does that for you.
Instead of spamming a bunch of available features that are not actually
used anywhere, only set those that are actually used in the test suite.
In the future, this should probably be based on the target triple only,
with the ability to have wildcards in the triple.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
Our documentation for running LIT is basically wrong, since it doesn't
mention `llvm-lit`, and nothing works without it. Note that this
documentation improvement reflects the current reality outside of
the recent efforts on improving the test suite. My goal is to document
the current way of running the test suite, so that everybody agrees on
how things currently work. As the configuration system for libc++ gets
simplified, we can come back and keep this documentation up to date to
reflect those changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77673
We've been meaning to remove those targets for a while, and the fix is
simple enough cause they're all just aliases to other targets.
This is a re-application of f383fb40b1, wich was reverted in 04d48111b
because the build bots had not been updated yet. The build bot configurations
have now been updated not to use the deprecated targets, and I verified
that they were using the non-deprecated targets, so we should be good
unless I missed a bot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76104
It's hard to imagine someone using a recent version of libc++ with a
roughly 3 years old Clang. Since we're not testing libc++ with Clang 3.5
anyway, claiming support for it is somewhat of a lie.
Note that we don't test Clang 4 either, however I have no reason to bump
the requirement beyond Clang 4 at the moment, whereas removing Clang 3.5
allows simplifying the test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76618
This reverts commit f383fb40b. It looks like several of our build bots
are still using the legacy target names, so we'll change those before
we commit this change again.
We've been meaning to remove those targets for a while, and the fix is
simple enough cause they're all just aliases to other targets.
There's no doubt this commit will break some CI systems, however the
fix is trivial.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76104
Summary: The return type modification has already been implemented in rL364840 and rL365290.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF, #libc!
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70275
Summary:
This patch implements https://wg21.link/P0325.
Please mind that at it is my first contribution to libc++, so I may have forgotten to abide to some conventions.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, lichray
Reviewed By: ldionne, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, dexonsmith, zoecarver, christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69882
Summary:
Rewrite the in-tree build to be a clearer tl;dr like we have for the
out-of-tree build.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, christof, ldionne, enh, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69917
Summary:
D64914 added support for applying [[nodiscard]] to constructors. This
commit uses that capability to flag incorrect uses of std::lock_guard
where one forgets to actually create a variable for the lock_guard.
rdar://45790820
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, Quuxplusone, lebedev.ri
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65900
llvm-svn: 368664
Summary:
This patch make G++03 explicitly unsupported with libc++, as discussed on the mailing lists.
Below is the rational for this decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
libc++ claims to support GCC with C++03 ("G++03"), and this is a problem for our users.
Our C++03 users are all using Clang. They must be. Less than 9% of the C++03 tests pass with GCC [1][2]. No non-trivial C++ program could work.
Attempting to support G++03 impacts our QoI considerably. Unlike Clang, G++03 offers almost no C++11 extensions. If we could remove all the fallbacks for G++03, it would mean libc++ could::
* Improve Correctness:
Every `#ifdef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_<C++11-feature>` is a bug manifest. It exists to admit for deviant semantics.
* Achieve ABI stability between C++03 and C++11
Differences between our C++03 and C++Rest branches contain ABI bugs. For example `std::nullptr_t` and `std::function::operator()(...)` are currently incompatible between C++11 and C++03, but could be fixed.
* Decrease Compile Times and Memory Usage:
Writing efficient SFINAE requires C++11. Using alias templates, libc++ could reduce the number of instantiations it produces substantially.
* Decrease Binary Size
Similar to the last point, G++03 forces metaprogramming techniques that emit more debug information [3] [4]. Compared to libstdc++, debug information size increases of +10% are not uncommon.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: zoecarver, aprantl, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63154
llvm-svn: 363219
As we gear up to drop support for GCC in C++03, we should make clear
what our C++03 mode is, the C++11 extensions it provides,
and the C++11 extensions it depends on.
The section of this document discussing user-facing extensions has
been left blank while the community discusses new directions. For now
it's just a warning to users.
Additionally, the document contains examples of how these extensions
should be used and why. For example, using alias templates over class
templates.
llvm-svn: 363110
Summary:
Following the discussion on the libcxx-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-May/000358.html),
this implements the new policy for handling experimental features and
their deprecation. We basically add a deprecation warning for
std::experimental::filesystem, and we remove a bunch of <experimental/*>
headers that were now empty.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, libcxx-commits, jfb
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62428
llvm-svn: 363072
Summary:
This updates all places in documentation that refer to "Mac OS X", "OS X", etc.
to instead use the modern name "macOS" when no specific version number is
mentioned.
If a specific version is mentioned, this attempts to use the OS name at the time
of that version:
* Mac OS X for 10.0 - 10.7
* OS X for 10.8 - 10.11
* macOS for 10.12 - present
Reviewers: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, arphaman, cfe-commits, lldb-commits, libcxx-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb, #libc, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62654
llvm-svn: 362113
merged type info names.
Previously std::type_info always expected type info string to be unique.
But this isn't always the case. Like when -Bsymbolic is passed to the
linker or due to llvm.org/PR37398.
This patch adds the LIBCXX_HAS_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES_DEFAULT CMake
option which, when specified, overrides the default configuration for
the library.
The current defaults still assume unique names even though this isn't
strictly correct for ELF binaries. We should consider changing the
default in a follow up commit.
llvm-svn: 361913
Summary:
This provides the `std::destroying_delete_t` declaration in C++2a and after. (Even when the compiler doesn't support the language feature).
However, the feature test macro `__cpp_lib_destroying_delete` is only defined when we have both language support and C++2a.
Reviewers: ldionne, ckennelly, serge-sans-paille, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: dexonsmith, riccibruno, christof, jwakely, jdoerfert, mclow.lists, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55840
llvm-svn: 361572
This builds on the work done in r342808 and adds _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT
to 37 more functions, namely:
adjacent_find, all_of, any_of, binary_search, clamp, count_if, count,
equal_range, equal, find_end, find_first_not_of, find_first_of, find_if,
find, includes, is_heap_until, is_heap, is_partitioned, is_permutation,
is_sorted_until, is_sorted, lexicographical_compare, lower_bound,
max_element, max, min_element, min, minmax_element, minmax, mismatch,
none_of, remove_if, remove, search_n, search, unique, upper_bound
The motivation here is that we noticed that find_if is nodiscard with
Visual Studio's standard library, and we deemed that useful
(https://crbug.com/948122).
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/c17-progress-in-vs-2017-15-5-and-15-6/
says "Our criteria for emitting the warning are: discarding the return
value is a guaranteed leak [...], discarding the return value is
near-guaranteed to be incorrect (e.g. remove()/remove_if()/unique()), or
the function is essentially a pure observer (e.g. vector::empty() and
std::is_sorted())." so I went through algorithm and tried to apply these
criteria.
Some of these, like vector::empty() are already nodiscard per C++
standard and didn't need changing.
I didn't (yet?) go over std::string::find* methods which should probably
have _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT too (but not as part of this change).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60145
llvm-svn: 357619
This documentation was removed when we added <filesystem> to the dylib
in r356518, but it really should have been updated to reflect the new
state of things. Keeping documentation around doesn't hurt and users
will have an easier time migrating.
llvm-svn: 356681
Summary: Filesystem doesn't work on Windows, so we need a mechanism to turn it off for the time being.
Reviewers: ldionne, serge-sans-paille, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: mstorsjo, mgorny, christof, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59619
llvm-svn: 356633
Summary:
This change allows specifying the version of libc++abi's ABI to re-export
when configuring CMake. It also clearly identifies which ABI version of
libc++abi each export file contains.
Finally, it removes hardcoded knowledge about the 10.9 SDK for MacOS,
since that knowledge is not relevant anymore. Indeed, libc++ can't be
built with the toolchain that came with the 10.9 SDK anyway because
the version of Clang it includes is too old (for example if you want
to build a working libc++.dylib, you need bugfixes to visibility
attributes that are only in recent Clangs).
Reviewers: dexonsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, arphaman, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59489
llvm-svn: 356587
Summary:
This patch treats <filesystem> as a first-class citizen of the dylib,
like all other sub-libraries (e.g. <chrono>). As such, it also removes
all special handling for installing the filesystem library separately
or disabling part of the test suite from the lit command line.
Unlike the previous attempt (r356500), this doesn't remove all the
filesystem tests.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jfb, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152
llvm-svn: 356518
When I applied r356500 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152), I somehow
deleted all of filesystem's tests. I will revert r356500 and re-apply
it properly.
llvm-svn: 356505
Summary:
This patch treats <filesystem> as a first-class citizen of the dylib,
like all other sub-libraries (e.g. <chrono>). As such, it also removes
all special handling for installing the filesystem library separately
or disabling part of the test suite from the lit command line.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jfb, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59152
llvm-svn: 356500
Summary:
In r342843, I added deprecation warnings to some facilities that were
deprectated in C++14 and C++17. However, those deprecation warnings
were not enabled by default.
After discussing this on IRC, we had finally gotten consensus to enable
those warnings by default, and I'm getting around to doing that only
now.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58140
llvm-svn: 355961
We're building tests with -nostdlib which means that we need to
explicitly include the builtins library. When using libgcc (default)
we can simply include -lgcc_s on the link line, but when using
compiler-rt builtins we need a complete path to the builtins library.
This path is already available in CMake as <PROJECT>_BUILTINS_LIBRARY,
so we just need to pass that path to lit and if config.compiler_rt is
true, link it to the test.
Prior to this patch, running tests when compiler-rt is being used as
the builtins library was broken as all tests would fail to link, but
with this change running tests when compiler-rt bultins library is
being used should be supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56701
llvm-svn: 353208
This patch removes some vendor-specific availability XFAILs from the
test suite. In the future, when a new feature is introduced in the
dylib, an availability macro should be created and a matching lit
feature should be created. That way, the test suite can XFAIL whenever
the implementation lacks the necessary feature instead of being
cluttered by vendor-specific annotations.
Right now, those vendor-specific annotations are still somewhat cluttering
the test suite by being in `config.py`, but at least they are localized.
In the future, we could design a way to define those less intrusively or
even automatically based on the availability macros that already exist
in <__config>.
llvm-svn: 353201
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
Louis Dionne