The reason for the recent fallout for "attaching comments to any redeclaration"
change are two false assumptions:
(1) a RawComment is attached to a single decl (not true for 'typedef struct X *Y'
where we want the comment to be attached to both X and Y);
(2) the whole redeclaration chain has only a single comment (obviously false, the
user can put a separate comment for each redeclaration).
To fix (1) I revert the part of the recent change where a 'Decl*' member was
introduced to RawComment. Now ASTContext has a separate DenseMap for mapping
'Decl*' to 'FullComment*'.
To fix (2) I just removed the test with this assumption. We might not parse
every comment in redecl chain if we already parsed at least one.
llvm-svn: 161878
'templated' declaration for a function or class template to refer to
the function or class template itself, to which the documentation will
be attached. Fixes PR13593.
llvm-svn: 161762
Not only look for the comment near the declaration itself, but also walk the
redeclaration chain: the previous declaration might have had a documentation
comment.
llvm-svn: 161722
This also provides isConst/Volatile/Restrict on FunctionTypes to coalesce
the implementation with other callers (& update those other callers).
Patch contributed by Sam Panzer (panzer@google.com).
llvm-svn: 161647
This is effectively a warning for code that violates core issue 903 & thus will
become standard error in the future, hopefully. It catches strange null
pointers such as: '\0', 1 - 1, const int null = 0; etc...
There's currently a flaw in this warning (& the warning for 'false' as a null
pointer literal as well) where it doesn't trigger on comparisons (ptr == '\0'
for example). Fix to come in a future patch.
Also, due to this only being a warning, not an error, it triggers quite
frequently on gtest code which tests expressions for null-pointer-ness in a
SFINAE context (so it wouldn't be a problem if this was an error as in an
actual implementation of core issue 903). To workaround this for now, the
diagnostic does not fire in unevaluated contexts.
Review by Sean Silva and Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 161501
update implementation to match. An elidable, non-trivial constructor call is a
side-effect under this definition, but wasn't under the old one, because we are
not required to evaluate it even though it may have an effect.
Also rationalize checking for volatile reads: just look for lvalue-to-rvalue
conversions on volatile glvalues, and ignore whether a DeclRefExpr etc is for
a volatile variable.
llvm-svn: 161393
was mistakenly classifying dynamic_casts which might throw as having no side
effects.
Switch it from a visitor to a switch, so it is kept up-to-date as future Expr
nodes are added. Move it from ExprConstant.cpp to Expr.cpp, since it's not
really related to constant expression evaluation.
Since we use HasSideEffect to determine whether to emit an unused global with
internal linkage, this has the effect of suppressing emission of globals in
some cases.
I've left many of the Objective-C cases conservatively assuming that the
expression has side-effects. I'll leave it to someone with better knowledge
of Objective-C than mine to improve them.
llvm-svn: 161388
Doxygen manual claims that multiple \brief or \returns commands will be merged
together, but actual behavior is different (second \brief command becomes a
part of a discussion, second \returns becomes a "Returns: blah" paragraph on
its own). Anyway, it seems to be a bad idea to use multiple \brief or \returns
commands in a single command.
llvm-svn: 161325
This only applies in the case where ->* is not overloaded, since it
specifically looks for BinaryOperator and not CXXOperatorCallExpr.
llvm-svn: 161275
By C++ standard, the vtable should be generated if the first non-inline
virtual function is defined in the TU. Current version of clang doesn't
generate vtable if the first virtual function is defaulted, because the
key function is regarded as the defaulted function.
Patch by Li Kan!
llvm-svn: 161236
The only caveat is renumbering CXCommentKind enum for aesthetic reasons -- this
breaks libclang binary compatibility, but should not be a problem since API is
so new.
This also fixes PR13372 as a side-effect.
llvm-svn: 161087
Richard Smith