Do not warn for redundant conditional expressions when the true and false
branches are expanded from different macros even when they are defined by
one another.
Patch by Daniel Krupp.
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 375102
Summary: It was trying to pass a dependent expression into constant evaluator.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63188
llvm-svn: 363133
Summary:
The assertion "isIntegerConstantExpr" is triggered in the
isIntegerConstantExpr(), we should not call it if the expression is value
dependent.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62947
llvm-svn: 362701
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Examples:
* Always evaluates to 0:
```
int X;
if (0 & X) return;
```
* Always evaluates to ~0:
```
int Y;
if (Y | ~0) return;
```
* The symbol is unmodified:
```
int Z;
Z &= ~0;
```
Patch by: Lilla Barancsuk!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39285
llvm-svn: 321168
Redundant Expression Checker is updated to be able to detect expressions that
contain macros. Also, other small details are modified to improve the current
implementation.
The improvements in detail are as follows:
* Binary and ternary operator expressions containing two constants, with at
least one of them from a macro, are detected and tested for redundancy.
Macro expressions are treated somewhat differently from other expressions,
because the particular values of macros can vary across builds.
They can be considered correct and intentional, even if macro values equal,
produce ranges that exclude each other or fully overlap, etc.
* The code structure is slightly modified: typos are corrected,
comments are added and some functions are renamed to improve comprehensibility,
both in the checker and the test file. A few test cases are moved to another
function.
* The checker is now able to detect redundant CXXFunctionalCastExprs as well.
A corresponding test case is added.
Patch by: Lilla Barancsuk!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38688
llvm-svn: 317570
Catch trivially true statements of the form a != 1 || a != 3. Statements like
these are likely errors. They are particularly easy to miss when handling enums:
enum State {
RUNNING,
STOPPED,
STARTING,
ENDING
}
...
if (state != RUNNING || state != STARTING)
...
Patch by Blaise Watson!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29858
llvm-svn: 298607
Summary: This patch is adding support to recognize more complex redundant expressions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, chrisha
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21392
llvm-svn: 274731
Summary:
This patch is adding support for conditional expression and overloaded operators.
To decrease false-positive, this patch is adding a list of banned macro names that
has multiple variant with same integer value.
Also fixed support for template instantiation and added an unittest.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: klimek, Sarcasm, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19703
llvm-svn: 269275
Summary:
This checker finds redundant expression on both side of a binary operator.
The current implementation provide a function to check whether expressions
are equivalent. This implementation is able to recognize the common
subset encounter in C++ program. Side-effects like "x++" are not considered
to be equivalent.
There are many False Positives related to macros and to floating point
computations (detecting NaN). The checker is ignoring these cases.
Example:
```
if( !dst || dst->depth != desired_depth ||
dst->nChannels != desired_num_channels ||
dst_size.width != src_size.width ||
dst_size.height != dst_size.height ) <<--- bug
{
```
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: danielmarjamaki, fahlgren, jordan_rose, zaks.anna, Eugene.Zelenko, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19451
llvm-svn: 267574
Aaron Ballman