This adds versions of operator + and - which are optimized for the LHS/RHS of the
operator being RValue's. When an RValue is available, we can use its storage space
instead of allocating new space.
On code such as ConstantRange which makes heavy use of APInt's over 64-bits in size,
this results in significant numbers of saved allocations.
Thanks to David Blaikie for all the review and most of the code here.
llvm-svn: 276470
APInt::slt was copying the LHS and RHS in to temporaries then making
them unsigned so that it could use an unsigned comparision. It did
this even on the paths which were trivial to give results for, such
as the sign bit of the LHS being set while RHS was not set.
This changes the logic to return out immediately in the trivial cases,
and use an unsigned comparison in the remaining cases. But this time,
just use the unsigned comparison directly without creating any temporaries.
This works because, for example:
true = (-2 slt -1) = (0xFE ult 0xFF)
Also added some tests explicitly for slt with APInt's larger than 64-bits
so that this new code is tested.
Using the memory for 'opt -O2 verify-uselistorder.lto.opt.bc -o opt.bc'
(see r236629 for details), this reduces the number of allocations from
26.8M to 23.9M.
llvm-svn: 270881
Summary:
This patch changes the way APInt is compared with a value of type uint64_t.
Before the uint64_t value was truncated to the size of APInt before comparison.
Now the comparison takes into account full 64-bit precision.
Test Plan: Unit tests added. No regressions. Self-hosted check-all done as well.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dexonsmith
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10655
llvm-svn: 241204
Summary: This patch fixes step D4 of Knuth's division algorithm implementation. Negative sign of the step result was not always detected due to incorrect "borrow" handling.
Test Plan: Unit test that reveals the bug included.
Reviewers: chandlerc, yaron.keren
Reviewed By: yaron.keren
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9196
llvm-svn: 235699
APInt uses Knuth's D algorithm for long division. In rare cases the
implementation applied a transformation that was not needed.
Added unit tests for long division. KnuthDiv() procedure is fully covered.
There is a case in APInt::divide() that I believe is never used (marked with
a comment) as all users of divide() handle trivial cases earlier.
Patch by Pawel Bylica!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8448
llvm-svn: 233312
It's not clear what the semantics of a self-move should be. The
consensus appears to be that a self-move should leave the object in a
moved-from state, which is what our existing move assignment operator
does.
However, the MSVC 2013 STL will perform self-moves in some cases. In
particular, when doing a std::stable_sort of an already sorted APSInt
vector of an appropriate size, one of the merge steps will self-move
half of the elements.
We don't notice this when building with MSVC, because MSVC will not
synthesize the move assignment operator for APSInt. Presumably MSVC
does this because APInt, the base class, has user-declared special
members that implicitly delete move special members. Instead, MSVC
selects the copy-assign operator, which defends against self-assignment.
Clang, on the other hand, selects the move-assign operator, and we get
garbage APInts.
llvm-svn: 215478
This was due to arithmetic overflow in the getNumBits() computation. Now we
cast BitWidth to a uint64_t so that does not occur during the computation. After
the computation is complete, the uint64_t is truncated when the function
returns.
I know that this is not something that is likely to happen, but it *IS* a valid
input and we should not blow up.
llvm-svn: 199609
PR15138 was opened because of a segfault in the Bitcode writer.
The actual issue ended up being a bug in APInt where calls to
APInt::getActiveWords returns a bogus value when the APInt value
is 0. This patch fixes the problem by ensuring that getActiveWords
returns 1 for 0 valued APInts.
llvm-svn: 174641
of a constant had a minor typo introduced when copying it from the book, which
caused it to favor negative approximations over positive approximations in many
cases. Positive approximations require fewer operations beyond the multiplication.
In the case of division by 3, we still generate code that is a single instruction
larger than GCC's code.
llvm-svn: 126097
Dimitry Andric