There are `constexpr` versions for the different `__invoke` functions, which seem to be identical other than begin `constexpr` since C++11 instead of being `constexpr` since C++20.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123003
There are no such markings left - all of them have been fixed or
analyzed.
This closes llvm.org/PR32730 (github issue #32077).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123145
The is a followup of D116965 to split the calendar header. This is a
preparation to add the formatters for the chrono header.
The code is only moved no other changes have been made.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122995
This patch implements P0674R1, i.e. support for arrays in std::make_shared
and std::allocate_shared.
Co-authored-by: Zoe Carver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62641
On Windows, like on macOS and FreeBSD, widening char(-5) in the
"C" locale succeeds and produces L'\u00fb'.
Switch widen_many to test \xfb instead of \x85; the mingw
version of btowc widens \x85 in the "C" locale into
\u2026 (which is the corresponding character according to the
Windows-1252 codepage), while Microsoft CRT's btowc widens it
into \u0085 (just like macOS and FreeBSD). Switch this to test \xfb
which is the character tested by the widen_1 test (as `char(-5)`),
which gets handled the same by all Windows implementations of btowc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121003
[libc++] add global variable template std::views::empty
Note it is neither a range adaptor, nor a CPO. It is simplify a global variable template.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122996
This iterator is used to test code that only needs to satisfy the
output_iterator concept. Follow-up changes will use this iterator in
older language Standards.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122072
Instead of using `.fail.cpp` tests, use `.verify.cpp` to check for the
exact reason of the failure. In the case of deduction guides, use SFINAE
based tests instead since that is our preferred way of testing those.
Finally, ensure that we actually run the test in `iter_alloc_deduction.pass.cpp`,
since we were not running anything before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123055
Since a8d15a9266 / D110975, this is
the default, even if winpthread headers are available, so we don't
need to cargo cult setting this option in all builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122717
Note that `generate_assertion_tests.py` will be renamed to
`generate_header_tests.py` separately to facilitate change tracking.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123000
The pointer.volatile.pass.cpp test was already marked as XFAIL for
mingw-dll (for reasons explained in the comment above it).
The same issue also appears in clang-cl-dll when built with newer
CMake versions. (It didn't appear with older versions of CMake, as
CMake built the library with the clang-cl flag `-std:c++latest` when
we've requested C++ 20 - which practically built it in c++2b mode with
current clang versions. With current versions of CMake, it passes
`-std:c++20` instead.)
As it succeeds/fails dependent on factors we don't
directly control, mark it as UNSUPPORTED instead of XFAIL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122718
Note of the functions was marked as _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
Did some minor formatting fixes to keep consistency. To keep it easy to
review not all odd formatting has been fixed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122834
The alternative outputs of std::put_time and std::strftime are the
easiest to test with the Japanese locale. This is a preparation for the
tests of the chrono formatters.
Note since it takes a while before the Docker file changes propagate to
the build nodes the verification of the locale is done in a separate
patch.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122736
Reduced the details of the non-chrono formatting information. This has
been shipped and these details part of P0645 which is still documented.
Removing this information keeps the information up-to-date.
Adds the formatters required for the types chrono namespace.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122735
It seems to have been added back in 761e42fa3d for Clang to use it,
however it seems to have never been used for that purpose, so it is
probably fine to remove it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122330
For some reason, we've been going without a MSAN CI job, even though
even run-buildbot defined a generic-msan job. This must have been an
oversight that went unnoticed. Thanks to @EricWF for the catch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120851
This patch changes the requirement for getting the declaration of the
assertion handler from including <__assert> to including any public
C++ header of the library. Note that C compatibility headers are
excluded because we don't implement all the C headers ourselves --
some of them are taken straight from the C library, like assert.h.
It also adds a generated test to check it. Furthermore, this new
generated test is designed in a way that will make it possible to
replace almost all the existing test-generation scripts with this
system in upcoming patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122506
This allows us to detect whether we're being compiled with LLVM's libunwind
more easily, without CMake having to set explicit variables.
As discussed in https://llvm.org/D119538.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121015
Since we expect the condition to be true most of the time, we might
as well tell the compiler. And when assertions are disabled, we
might as well tell the compiler that it's allowed to assume that
the condition holds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122397
This means that re-running with llvm-lit in that configuration will
work as expected. This also enables assertions in libc++abi in the
Generic-assertions CI job, which was disabled previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122597
Instead of using a temporary `string` in `__vformat_to_wrapped` use a new
generic iterator. This aids to reduce the number of template instantions
and avoids using a `string` to buffer the entire formatted output.
This changes the type of `format_context` and `wformat_context`, this can
still be done since the code isn't ABI stable yet.
Several approaches have been evaluated:
- Using a __output_buffer base class with:
- a put function to store the buffer in its internal buffer
- a virtual flush function to copy the internal buffer to the output
- Using a `function` to forward the output operation to the output buffer,
much like the next method.
- Using a type erased function point to store the data in the buffer.
The last version resulted in the best performance. For some cases there's
still a loss of speed over the original method. This loss many becomes
apparent when large strings are copied to a pointer like iterator, before
the compiler optimized this using `memcpy`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110495
I suspect this is a remnant of the times when we were not comfortable
using Clang's C++11/14 extensions everywhere, but now we do, so we can
use _BoolConstant instead and get rid of the macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122351
In C++20 the type trait `type_identity` was introduced. For the same purpose there is `__identity` for pre-C++20 code. The name is confusing, because since C++20 there is also `identity`, which isn't a type trait.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122017
I audited all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT to make sure that we only used it
for "basic assertions", i.e. assertions with constant-time conditions.
I also audited all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT to make sure we used it
only for debug-mode assertions, and in one case had to change for
_LIBCPP_ASSERT instead.
As a fly-by, I also changed a couple of tests against nullptr or 0 to
be more explicit.
After this patch, all uses of _LIBCPP_ASSERT should be with constant-time
conditions, and all uses of _LIBCPP_DEBUG_ASSERT should be with conditions
that we only want to check when the debug mode is enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122395
Add missing commit SHAs in a few cases, and use "All Platforms" when
the change affected all platforms instead of explicitly listing the
platforms, since there's too many to list exhaustively.
This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
Nikolas Klauser