Turn llvm::SpecialCaseList into a simple class that parses text files in
a specified format and knows nothing about LLVM IR. Move this class into
LLVMSupport library. Implement two users of this class:
* DFSanABIList in DFSan instrumentation pass.
* SanitizerBlacklist in Clang CodeGen library.
The latter will be modified to use actual source-level information from frontend
(source file names) instead of unstable LLVM IR things (LLVM Module identifier).
Remove dependency edge from ClangCodeGen/ClangDriver to LLVMTransformUtils.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 212643
Also updated as many loops as I could find using df_begin/idf_begin -
strangely I found no uses of idf_begin. Is that just used out of tree?
Also a few places couldn't use df_begin because either they used the
member functions of the depth first iterators or had specific ordering
constraints (I added a comment in the latter case).
Based on a patch by Jim Grosbach. (Jim - you just had iterator_range<T>
where you needed iterator_range<idf_iterator<T>>)
llvm-svn: 206016
This adds back r204781.
Original message:
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
llvm-svn: 204934
This reverts commit r204781.
I will follow up to with msan folks to see what is what they
were trying to do with aliases to weak aliases.
llvm-svn: 204784
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
llvm-svn: 204781
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 203083
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
Currently SplitBlockAndInsertIfThen requires that branch condition is an
Instruction itself, which is very inconvenient, because it is sometimes an
Operator, or even a Constant.
llvm-svn: 197677
The new command line flags are -dfsan-ignore-pointer-label-on-store and -dfsan-ignore-pointer-label-on-load. Their default value matches the current labelling scheme.
Additionally, the function __dfsan_union_load is marked as readonly.
Patch by Lorenzo Martignoni!
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2187
llvm-svn: 195382
DFSan changes the ABI of each function in the module. This makes it possible
for a function with the native ABI to be called with the instrumented ABI,
or vice versa, thus possibly invoking undefined behavior. A simple way
of statically detecting instances of this problem is to prepend the prefix
"dfs$" to the name of each instrumented-ABI function.
This will not catch every such problem; in particular function pointers passed
across the instrumented-native barrier cannot be used on the other side.
These problems could potentially be caught dynamically.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1373
llvm-svn: 189052
Summary:
When the -dfsan-debug-nonzero-labels parameter is supplied, the code
is instrumented such that when a call parameter, return value or load
produces a nonzero label, the function __dfsan_nonzero_label is called.
The idea is that a debugger breakpoint can be set on this function
in a nominally label-free program to help identify any bugs in the
instrumentation pass causing labels to be introduced.
Reviewers: eugenis
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1405
llvm-svn: 188472
This replaces the old incomplete greylist functionality with an ABI
list, which can provide more detailed information about the ABI and
semantics of specific functions. The pass treats every function in
the "uninstrumented" category in the ABI list file as conforming to
the "native" (i.e. unsanitized) ABI. Unless the ABI list contains
additional categories for those functions, a call to one of those
functions will produce a warning message, as the labelling behaviour
of the function is unknown. The other supported categories are
"functional", "discard" and "custom".
- "discard" -- This function does not write to (user-accessible) memory,
and its return value is unlabelled.
- "functional" -- This function does not write to (user-accessible)
memory, and the label of its return value is the union of the label of
its arguments.
- "custom" -- Instead of calling the function, a custom wrapper __dfsw_F
is called, where F is the name of the function. This function may wrap
the original function or provide its own implementation.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1345
llvm-svn: 188402
DataFlowSanitizer is a generalised dynamic data flow analysis.
Unlike other Sanitizer tools, this tool is not designed to detect a
specific class of bugs on its own. Instead, it provides a generic
dynamic data flow analysis framework to be used by clients to help
detect application-specific issues within their own code.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D965
llvm-svn: 187923
Peter Collingbourne