The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
Allow the clamp modifier on vop3 int arithmetic instructions in assembly
and disassembly.
This involved adding a clamp operand to the affected instructions in MIR
and MC, and thus having to fix up several places in codegen and MIR
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59267
Change-Id: Ic7775105f02a985b668fa658a0cd7837846a534e
llvm-svn: 356399
The debug-use flag must be set exactly for uses on DBG_VALUEs. This is
so obvious that it can be trivially inferred while parsing. This will
reduce noise when printing while omitting an information that has little
value to the user.
The parser will keep recognizing the flag for compatibility with old
`.mir` files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53903
llvm-svn: 345671
The original motivating example uses a 64-bit add, so the carry
is used. Insert a copy from VCC. This may allow shrinking of
the used carry instruction. At worst, we are replacing a
mov to materialize the constant with a copy of vcc.
llvm-svn: 340862
This needs to be done in the SSA fold operands
pass to be effective, so there is a bit of overlap
with SIShrinkInstructions but I don't think this
is practically avoidable.
llvm-svn: 340859
Matt Arsenault