Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Summary:
Without tree pruning clang has 2,667,552 points.
Wiht only dominators pruning: 1,515,586.
With both dominators & predominators pruning: 1,340,534.
Resubmit of r262103.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18341
llvm-svn: 264003
Summary:
These dependencies would be used in the future to reduce the number
of instrumented blocks(http://reviews.llvm.org/rL262103)
This is submitted as a separate CL because of previous problems with
ARM.
Subscribers: aemerson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18227
llvm-svn: 263797
llvm::getDISubprogram walks the instructions in a function, looking for one in the scope of the current function, so that it can find the !dbg entry for the subprogram itself.
Now that !dbg is attached to functions, this should not be necessary. This patch changes all uses to just query the subprogram directly on the function.
Ideally this should be NFC, but in reality its possible that a function:
has no !dbg (in which case there's likely a bug somewhere in an opt pass), or
that none of the instructions had a scope referencing the function, so we used to not find the !dbg on the function but now we will
Reviewed by Duncan Exon Smith.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18074
llvm-svn: 263184
Summary:
Without tree pruning clang has 2,667,552 points.
Wiht only dominators pruning: 1,515,586.
With both dominators & predominators pruning: 1,340,534.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17671
llvm-svn: 262103
Summary:
This is the first simple attempt to reduce number of coverage-
instrumented blocks.
If a basic block dominates all its successors, then its coverage
information is useless to us. Ingore such blocks if
santizer-coverage-prune-tree option is set.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17626
llvm-svn: 261949
Summary: Similar to the change we applied to ASan. The same test case works.
Reviewers: samsonov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11961
llvm-svn: 245067
DebugLoc::getFnDebugLoc() should soon be removed. Also,
getDISubprogram() might become more effective soon and wouldn't need to
scan debug locations at all, if function-level metadata would be emitted
by Clang.
llvm-svn: 239586
Second attempt; instead of using a named local variable, passing
arguments directly to `createSanitizerCtorAndInitFunctions` worked
on Windows.
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8780
llvm-svn: 236951
Summary:
This gives frontend more precise control over collected coverage
information. User can still override these options by passing
-mllvm flags.
No functionality change.
Test Plan: regression test suite.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9539
llvm-svn: 236687
Kostya Serebryany