Summary:
The short name is quite convenient so provide an accessor for them instead.
No functional change
Depends on D3177
Reviewers: matheusalmeida
Reviewed By: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3178
llvm-svn: 204911
These don't seem to have any real point. Let's start with
IndexingContext. I can't come up with any conceivable reason to have
many hundereds of thousands of these alive in an address space which
would make the 4x difference in allocated (but unused) memory for the
string scratch buffer a significant memory usage problem.
The EditedSource one is somewhat more surprising. This is an 8x increase
in the memory allocated (but not used) per editted source file. However,
for this to realistically be a problem, you would need to have over half
a million editted source files in a single address space, and even that
would only really have problems on 32-bit Windows where you really only
have 2gb of virtual address space. And what's more important, the fix to
this if it is actually an issue shouldn't be to shrink the allocator's
size, it is to pass a single allocator into *many* edited source file
objects and let them share the memory.
These were the only two uses of custom sized BumpPtrAllocators
(excluding ones in the JIT using a custom allocation strategy) in all of
LLVM, Clang, LLD, LLDB, or Polly. I don't think we actually need this
complexity in the primary BumpPtrAllocator at all and am planning to
remove it.
llvm-svn: 204910
rewrite some of them to be more clear.
The terminology being used in our allocators is making me really sad. We
call things slab allocators that aren't at all slab allocators. It is
quite confusing.
llvm-svn: 204907
Fix description:
Expressions like 'cmp r0, #(l1 - l2) >> 3' could not be evaluated on asm parsing stage,
since it is impossible to resolve labels on this stage. In the end of stage we still have
expression (MCExpr).
Then, when we want to encode it, we expect it to be an immediate, but it still an expression.
Patch introduces a Fixup (MCFixup instance), that is processed after main encoding stage.
llvm-svn: 204899
The LangRef warning wasn't formatting the way I intended it to anyway.
Surprisingly inalloca appears to work, even when optimizations are
enabled. We generate very bad code for it, but we can self-host and run
lots of big tests.
llvm-svn: 204888
It seems that gcov, when faced with a string that is apparently zero
length, just keeps reading words until it finds a length it likes
better. I'm not really sure why this is, but it's simple enough to
make llvm-cov follow suit.
llvm-svn: 204881
When parsing MS inline assembly, we note that fpsw is an implicit def of
most x87 FP operations, and add it to the clobber list. However, we
don't recognize fpsw as a gcc register name, and we assert. Clang
always adds an fpsr clobber, which means the same thing to LLVM, so we
can just use that.
This test case was broken by my LLVM change r196939.
Reviewers: echristo
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2993
llvm-svn: 204878
instead of rolling an inefficient version of the function. This
changes some order of emission of metadata nodes, fix up those
testcases and make them more flexible to some changes.
llvm-svn: 204874
Summary:
Tested with a unit test because we don't appear to have any transforms
that use this other than ASan, I think.
Fixes PR17935.
Reviewers: nicholas
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3194
llvm-svn: 204866
Functions may in an instrumented binary but not in the original source
when they're inserted by the compiler or the runtime. These functions
aren't meaningful to the user, so teach llvm-cov to skip over them
instead of crashing.
llvm-svn: 204863