This change gives explicit order of verifier execution and adds
`hasRegionVerifier` and `verifyWithRegions` to increase the granularity
of verifier classification. The orders are as below,
1. InternalOpTrait will be verified first, they can be run independently.
2. `verifyInvariants` which is constructed by ODS, it verifies the type,
attributes, .etc.
3. Other Traits/Interfaces that have marked their verifier as
`verifyTrait` or `verifyWithRegions=0`.
4. Custom verifier which is defined in the op and has marked
`hasVerifier=1`
If an operation has regions, then it may have the second phase,
5. Traits/Interfaces that have marked their verifier as
`verifyRegionTrait` or
`verifyWithRegions=1`. This implies the verifier needs to access the
operations in its regions.
6. Custom verifier which is defined in the op and has marked
`hasRegionVerifier=1`
Note that the second phase will be run after the operations in the
region are verified. Based on the verification order, you will be able to
avoid verifying duplicate things.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116789
Also make the ODS Operator class have const iterator, and use const
references for existing API taking Operator by reference.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117516
This field allows for defining a code block that is placed in both the interface
and trait declarations. This is very useful when defining a set of utilities to
expose on both the Interface class and the derived attribute/operation/type.
In non-static methods, `$_attr`/`$_op`/`$_type` (depending on the type of
interface) may be used to refer to an instance of the IR entity. In the interface
declaration, this is an instance of the interface class. In the trait declaration,
this is an instance of the concrete entity class (e.g. `IntegerAttr`, `FuncOp`, etc.).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116961
ODS currently emits the interface trait class as a nested class inside the
interface class. As an unintended consequence, the default implementations of
interface methods have implicit access to static fields of the interface class,
e.g. those declared in `extraClassDeclaration`, including private methods (!),
or in the parent class. This may break the use of default implementations for
external models, which are not defined in the interface class, and generally
complexifies the abstraction.
Emit intraface traits outside of the interface class itself to avoid accidental
implicit visibility. Public static fields can still be accessed via explicit
qualification with a class name, e.g., `MyOpInterface::staticMethod()` instead
of `staticMethod`.
Update the documentation to clarify the role of `extraClassDeclaration` in
interfaces.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104384
Default implementations of interfaces may rely on extra class
declarations, which aren't currently generated in the external model,
that in turn may rely on functions defined in the main Attribute/Type
class, which wouldn't be available on the external model.
It may be desirable to provide an interface implementation for an attribute or
a type without modifying the definition of said attribute or type. Notably,
this allows to implement interfaces for attributes and types outside of the
dialect that defines them and, in particular, provide interfaces for built-in
types. Provide the mechanism to do so.
Currently, separable registration requires the attribute or type to have been
registered with the context, i.e. for the dialect containing the attribute or
type to be loaded. This can be relaxed in the future using a mechanism similar
to delayed dialect interface registration.
See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-separable-attribute-type-interfaces/3637
Depends On D104233
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104234
This mechanism makes it possible for a dialect to not register all
operations but still answer interface-based queries.
This can useful for dialects that are "open" or connected to an external
system and still interoperate with the compiler. It can also open up the
possibility to have a more extensible compiler at runtime: the compiler
does not need a pre-registration for each operation and the dialect can
inject behavior dynamically.
Reviewed By: rriddle, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93085
Start the description from a new line instead of putting the first
paragraph in the section header. Wrap the class name in backticks to
make it clear that it relates to the code.
Use the correct interface base type name when generating attribute interfaces
with TabeGen.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92023
It may be necessary for interface methods to process or return variables with
the interface class type, in particular for attribute and type interfaces that
can return modified attributes and types that implement the same interface.
However, the code generated by ODS in this case would not compile because the
signature (and the body if provided) appear in the definition of the Model
class and before the interface class, which derives from the Model. Change the ODS
interface method generator to emit only method declarations in the Model class
itself, and emit method definitions after the interface class. Mark as "inline"
since their definitions are still emitted in the header and are no longer
implicitly inline. Add a forward declaration of the interface class before the
Concept+Model classes to make the class name usable in declarations.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91499
When compiling for code size, the use of a vtable causes a destructor(and constructor in certain cases) to be generated for the class. Interface models don't need a complex constructor or a destructor, so this can lead to many megabytes of code size increase(even in opt). This revision switches to a simpler struct of function pointers approach that accomplishes the same API requirements as before. This change requires no updates to user code, or any other code aside from the generator, as the user facing API is still exactly the same.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90085
The namespace can be specified using the `cppNamespace` field. This matches the functionality already present on dialects, enums, etc. This fixes problems with using interfaces on operations in a different namespace than the interface was defined in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83604
This revision adds support to ODS for generating interfaces for attributes and types, in addition to operations. These interfaces can be specified using `AttrInterface` and `TypeInterface` in place of `OpInterface`. All of the features of `OpInterface` are supported except for the `verify` method, which does not have a matching representation in the Attribute/Type world. Generating these interface can be done using `gen-(attr|type)-interface-(defs|decls|docs)`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81884
Using fully qualified names wherever possible avoids ambiguous class and function names. This is a follow-up to D82371.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82471
This range allows for performing many different operations on successor operands, including erasing/adding/setting. This removes the need for the explicit canEraseSuccessorOperand and eraseSuccessorOperand methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79077
This provides a much cleaner interface into Symbols, and allows for users to start injecting op-specific information. For example, derived op can now inject when a symbol can be discarded if use_empty. This would let us drop unused external functions, which generally have public visibility.
This revision also adds a new `extraTraitClassDeclaration` field to ODS OpInterface to allow for injecting declarations into the trait class that gets attached to the operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78522
These have proved incredibly useful for interleaving values between a range w.r.t to streams. After this revision, the mlir/Support/STLExtras.h is empty. A followup revision will remove it from the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78067
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
Add method in ODS to specify verification for operations implementing a
OpInterface. Use this with infer type op interface to verify that the
inferred type matches the return type and remove special case in
TestPatterns.
This could also have been achieved by using OpInterfaceMethod but verify
seems pretty common and it is not an arbitrary method that just happened
to be named verifyTrait, so having it be defined in special way seems
appropriate/better documenting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73122
This enables providing a default implementation of an interface method. This method is defined on the Trait that is attached to the operation, and thus has all of the same constraints and properties as any other interface method. This allows for interface authors to provide a conservative default implementation for certain methods, without requiring that all users explicitly define it. The default implementation can be specified via the argument directly after the interface method body:
StaticInterfaceMethod<
/*desc=*/"Returns whether two array of types are compatible result types for an op.",
/*retTy=*/"bool",
/*methodName=*/"isCompatibleReturnTypes",
/*args=*/(ins "ArrayRef<Type>":$lhs, "ArrayRef<Type>":$rhs),
/*methodBody=*/[{
return ConcreteOp::isCompatibleReturnTypes(lhs, rhs);
}],
/*defaultImplementation=*/[{
/// Returns whether two arrays are equal as strongest check for
/// compatibility by default.
return lhs == rhs;
}]
PiperOrigin-RevId: 286226054
This is needed for calling the generator on a .td file that contains both OpInterface definitions and op definitions with DeclareOpInterfaceMethods<...> Traits.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 285465784
Add DeclareOpInterfaceFunctions to enable specifying whether OpInterfaceMethods
for an OpInterface should be generated automatically. This avoids needing to
declare the extra methods, while also allowing adding function declaration by way of trait/inheritance.
Most of this change is mechanical/extracting classes to be reusable.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 272042739
This change adds support for documenting interfaces and their methods. A tablegen generator for the interface documentation is also added(gen-op-interface-doc).
Documentation is added to an OpInterface via the `description` field:
def MyOpInterface : OpInterface<"MyOpInterface"> {
let description = [{
My interface is very interesting.
}];
}
Documentation is added to an InterfaceMethod via a new `description` field that comes right before the optional body:
InterfaceMethod<"void", "foo", (ins), [{
This is the foo method.
}]>,
PiperOrigin-RevId: 270965485
Operation interfaces generally require a bit of boilerplate code to connect all of the pieces together. This cl introduces mechanisms in the ODS to allow for generating operation interfaces via the 'OpInterface' class.
Providing a definition of the `OpInterface` class will auto-generate the c++
classes for the interface. An `OpInterface` includes a name, for the c++ class,
along with a list of interface methods. There are two types of methods that can be used with an interface, `InterfaceMethod` and `StaticInterfaceMethod`. They are both comprised of the same core components, with the distinction that `StaticInterfaceMethod` models a static method on the derived operation.
An `InterfaceMethod` is comprised of the following components:
* ReturnType
- A string corresponding to the c++ return type of the method.
* MethodName
- A string corresponding to the desired name of the method.
* Arguments
- A dag of strings that correspond to a c++ type and variable name
respectively.
* MethodBody (Optional)
- An optional explicit implementation of the interface method.
def MyInterface : OpInterface<"MyInterface"> {
let methods = [
// A simple non-static method with no inputs.
InterfaceMethod<"unsigned", "foo">,
// A new non-static method accepting an input argument.
InterfaceMethod<"Value *", "bar", (ins "unsigned":$i)>,
// Query a static property of the derived operation.
StaticInterfaceMethod<"unsigned", "fooStatic">,
// Provide the definition of a static interface method.
// Note: `ConcreteOp` corresponds to the derived operation typename.
StaticInterfaceMethod<"Operation *", "create",
(ins "OpBuilder &":$builder, "Location":$loc), [{
return builder.create<ConcreteOp>(loc);
}]>,
// Provide a definition of the non-static method.
// Note: `op` corresponds to the derived operation variable.
InterfaceMethod<"unsigned", "getNumInputsAndOutputs", (ins), [{
return op.getNumInputs() + op.getNumOutputs();
}]>,
];
PiperOrigin-RevId: 264754898
Chia-hung Duan