- Remove unnecessary anchor function
- Remove unnecessary override of getAnalysisUsage
- Use reference instead of pointers where things cannot be nullptr
- Use ArrayRef instead of std::vector where possible
llvm-svn: 337989
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
* CFI instructions do not affect code generation (they are not counted as
instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging)
* Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
* analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register are valid
at its entry and exit
* verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
* inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848
llvm-svn: 330706
Summary:
This pass sinks COPY instructions into a successor block, if the COPY is not
used in the current block and the COPY is live-in to a single successor
(i.e., doesn't require the COPY to be duplicated). This avoids executing the
the copy on paths where their results aren't needed. This also exposes
additional opportunites for dead copy elimination and shrink wrapping.
These copies were either not handled by or are inserted after the MachineSink
pass. As an example of the former case, the MachineSink pass cannot sink
COPY instructions with allocatable source registers; for AArch64 these type
of copy instructions are frequently used to move function parameters (PhyReg)
into virtual registers in the entry block..
For the machine IR below, this pass will sink %w19 in the entry into its
successor (%bb.1) because %w19 is only live-in in %bb.1.
```
%bb.0:
%wzr = SUBSWri %w1, 1
%w19 = COPY %w0
Bcc 11, %bb.2
%bb.1:
Live Ins: %w19
BL @fun
%w0 = ADDWrr %w0, %w19
RET %w0
%bb.2:
%w0 = COPY %wzr
RET %w0
```
As we sink %w19 (CSR in AArch64) into %bb.1, the shrink-wrapping pass will be
able to see %bb.0 as a candidate.
With this change I observed 12% more shrink-wrapping candidate and 13% more dead copies deleted in spec2000/2006/2017 on AArch64.
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, thegameg, mcrosier, gberry, hfinkel, john.brawn, twoh, RKSimon, sebpop, kparzysz
Reviewed By: sebpop
Subscribers: evandro, sebpop, sfertile, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41463
llvm-svn: 328237
Summary:
First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this
is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post
for details:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html
The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution
of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the
prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The
gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for
reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data
followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some
predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors
cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative
execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the
nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel
processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to
a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain.
The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect
branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many
cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and
a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in
this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table
lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr
sequences into a switch over integers.
However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We
introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect
calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as
a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86.
Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the
processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The
retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the
call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result
is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be
used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an
actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address.
On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by
using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device.
For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several
different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if
one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct
stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address.
This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog
post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline
thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them.
These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that
routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to
different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use
`-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this
case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_r11
```
or on 32-bit:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_eax
__llvm_external_retpoline_ecx
__llvm_external_retpoline_edx
__llvm_external_retpoline_push
```
And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in
the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl`
instruction.
There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF
binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to
generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection.
The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from
precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have
found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them
here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for
retpoline-ed configurations for completeness.
For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the
compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this
particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all*
libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic
executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt`
(or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly
recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the
retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller.
When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the
Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications
running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%)
even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to
the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance
sensitive paths of the kernel.
When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially
C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic
performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or
virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%.
However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance
impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce
the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to
direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower
switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we
*strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically
linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well
tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from
the use of retpoline.
We will add detailed documentation covering these components in
subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available
as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to
get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're
planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get
a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors.
This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid,
Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time
sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to
everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in
discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at
Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline
design.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer
Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723
llvm-svn: 323155
This avoids playing games with pseudo pass IDs and avoids using an
unreliable MRI::isSSA() check to determine whether register allocation
has happened.
Note that this renames:
- MachineLICMID -> EarlyMachineLICM
- PostRAMachineLICMID -> MachineLICMID
to be consistent with the EarlyTailDuplicate/TailDuplicate naming.
llvm-svn: 322927
Split TailDuplicatePass into EarlyTailDuplicate and TailDuplicate. This
avoids playing games with fake pass IDs and using MRI::isSSA() to
determine pre-/post-RA state.
llvm-svn: 322926
Clang implements the -finstrument-functions flag inherited from GCC, which
inserts calls to __cyg_profile_func_{enter,exit} on function entry and exit.
This is useful for getting a trace of how the functions in a program are
executed. Normally, the calls remain even if a function is inlined into another
function, but it is useful to be able to turn this off for users who are
interested in a lower-level trace, i.e. one that reflects what functions are
called post-inlining. (We use this to generate link order files for Chromium.)
LLVM already has a pass for inserting similar instrumentation calls to
mcount(), which it does after inlining. This patch renames and extends that
pass to handle calls both to mcount and the cygprofile functions, before and/or
after inlining as controlled by function attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39287
llvm-svn: 318195
This reverts r317579, originally committed as r317100.
There is a design issue with marking CFI instructions duplicatable. Not
all targets support the CFIInstrInserter pass, and targets like Darwin
can't cope with duplicated prologue setup CFI instructions. The compact
unwind info emission fails.
When the following code is compiled for arm64 on Mac at -O3, the CFI
instructions end up getting tail duplicated, which causes compact unwind
info emission to fail:
int a, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m;
void n(int o, int *b) {
if (g)
f = 0;
for (; f < o; f++) {
m = a;
if (l > j * k > i)
j = i = k = d;
h = b[c] - e;
}
}
We get assembly that looks like this:
; BB#1: ; %if.then
Lloh3:
adrp x9, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh4:
ldr x9, [x9, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
mov w8, wzr
Lloh5:
str wzr, [x9]
stp x20, x19, [sp, #-16]! ; 8-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset w19, -8
.cfi_offset w20, -16
cmp w8, w0
b.lt LBB0_3
b LBB0_7
LBB0_2: ; %entry.if.end_crit_edge
Lloh6:
adrp x8, _f@GOTPAGE
Lloh7:
ldr x8, [x8, _f@GOTPAGEOFF]
Lloh8:
ldr w8, [x8]
stp x20, x19, [sp, #-16]! ; 8-byte Folded Spill
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset w19, -8
.cfi_offset w20, -16
cmp w8, w0
b.ge LBB0_7
LBB0_3: ; %for.body.lr.ph
Note the multiple .cfi_def* directives. Compact unwind info emission
can't handle that.
llvm-svn: 317726
Reland r317100 with minor fix regarding ComputeCommonTailLength function in
BranchFolding.cpp. Skipping top CFI instructions block needs to executed on
several more return points in ComputeCommonTailLength().
Original r317100 message:
"Correct dwarf unwind information in function epilogue for X86"
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
llvm-svn: 317579
mir-canon (MIRCanonicalizerPass) is a pass designed to reorder instructions and
rename operands so that two similar programs will diff more cleanly after being
run through mir-canon than they would otherwise. This project is still a work
in progress and there are ideas still being discussed for improving diff
quality.
M include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
M lib/CodeGen/CMakeLists.txt
M lib/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp
A lib/CodeGen/MIRCanonicalizerPass.cpp
llvm-svn: 317285
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35844
llvm-svn: 317100
Issues addressed since original review:
- Avoid bug in regalloc greedy/machine verifier when forwarding to use
in an instruction that re-defines the same virtual register.
- Fixed bug when forwarding to use in EarlyClobber instruction slot.
- Fixed incorrect forwarding to register definitions that showed up in
explicit_uses() iterator (e.g. in INLINEASM).
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 314729
Implementing this pass as a PowerPC specific pass. Branch coalescing utilizes
the analyzeBranch method which currently does not include any implicit operands.
This is not an issue on PPC but must be handled on other targets.
Pass is currently off by default. Enabled via -enable-ppc-branch-coalesce.
Differential Revision : https: // reviews.llvm.org/D32776
llvm-svn: 313061
- Use range based for
- Variable names should start with upper case
- Add `const`
- Change class name to match filename
- Fix doxygen comments
- Use MCPhysReg instead of unsigned
- Use references instead of pointers where things cannot be nullptr
- Misc coding style improvements
llvm-svn: 312846
Issues addressed since original review:
- Moved removal of dead instructions found by
LiveIntervals::shrinkToUses() outside of loop iterating over
instructions to avoid instructions being deleted while pointed to by
iterator.
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312328
It caused PR34387: Assertion failed: (RegNo < NumRegs && "Attempting to access record for invalid register number!")
> Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
> - Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
> doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
> register number of the use.
> - The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
> can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
> end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
>
> [MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
>
> This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
>
> This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
> be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
> assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
> allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
> through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312178
Issues identified by buildbots addressed since original review:
- Fixed ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug exposed by this change in r311907.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
llvm-svn: 312154
Implementing this pass as a PowerPC specific pass. Branch coalescing utilizes
the analyzeBranch method which currently does not include any implicit operands.
This is not an issue on PPC but must be handled on other targets.
Differential Revision : https: // reviews.llvm.org/D32776
llvm-svn: 311588
Two issues identified by buildbots were addressed:
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to physical register uses, since
doing so can break code that implicitly relies on the physical
register number of the use.
- The pass no longer forwards COPYs to undef uses, since doing so
can break the machine verifier by creating LiveRanges that don't
end on a use (since the undef operand is not considered a use).
[MachineCopyPropagation] Extend pass to do COPY source forwarding
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751
llvm-svn: 311135
This reverts commit r311038.
Several buildbots are breaking, and at least one appears to be due to
the forwarding of physical regs enabled by this change. Reverting while
I investigate further.
llvm-svn: 311062
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding.
This change also extends the MachineCopyPropagation pass to be able to
be run during register allocation, after physical registers have been
assigned, but before the virtual registers have been re-written, which
allows it to remove virtual register COPY LiveIntervals that become dead
through the forwarding of all of their uses.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa
Subscribers: jyknight, nemanjai, llvm-commits, nhaehnle, mcrosier, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30751
llvm-svn: 311038
CFI instructions that set appropriate cfa offset and cfa register are now
inserted in emitEpilogue() in X86FrameLowering.
Majority of the changes in this patch:
1. Ensure that CFI instructions do not affect code generation.
2. Enable maintaining correct information about cfa offset and cfa register
in a function when basic blocks are reordered, merged, split, duplicated.
These changes are target independent and described below.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
1. are duplicable
2. are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
3. can be compared as equal
Add information to each MachineBasicBlock about cfa offset and cfa register
that are valid at its entry and exit (incoming and outgoing CFI info). Add
support for updating this information when basic blocks are merged, split,
duplicated, created. Add a verification pass (CFIInfoVerifier) that checks
that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match incoming
values of their successors.
Incoming and outgoing CFI information is used by a late pass
(CFIInstrInserter) that corrects CFA calculation rule for a basic block if
needed. That means that additional CFI instructions get inserted at basic
block beginning to correct the rule for calculating CFA. Having CFI
instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA calculation rule
for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic block reordering,
or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the blocks have wrong
cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block above them.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18046
llvm-svn: 306529
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Use the initializeXXX method to initialize the RABasic pass in the
pipeline. This enables us to take advantage of the .mir infrastructure.
llvm-svn: 304602
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 304371
This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.
It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.
llvm-svn: 303369
Currently, when masked load, store, gather or scatter intrinsics are used, we check in CodeGenPrepare pass if the subtarget support these intrinsics, if not we replace them with scalar code - this is a functional transformation not an optimization (not optional).
CodeGenPrepare pass does not run when the optimization level is set to CodeGenOpt::None (-O0).
Functional transformation should run with all optimization levels, so here I created a new pass which runs on all optimization levels and does no more than this transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32487
llvm-svn: 303050
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 302938
This lets the pass focus on gathering the required analyzes, and the
utility class focus on the transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31303
llvm-svn: 302609
Fixed the asan bot failure which led to the last commit of the outliner being reverted.
The change is in lib/CodeGen/MachineOutliner.cpp in the SuffixTree's constructor. LeafVector
is no longer initialized using reserve but just a standard constructor.
llvm-svn: 297081
This patch adds a MachineSSA pass that coalesces blocks that branch
on the same condition.
Committing on behalf of Lei Huang.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28249
llvm-svn: 296670
This is a patch for the outliner described in the RFC at:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/104170.html
The outliner is a code-size reduction pass which works by finding
repeated sequences of instructions in a program, and replacing them with
calls to functions. This is useful to people working in low-memory
environments, where sacrificing performance for space is acceptable.
This adds an interprocedural outliner directly before printing assembly.
For reference on how this would work, this patch also includes X86
target hooks and an X86 test.
The outliner is run like so:
clang -mno-red-zone -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner file.c
Patch by Jessica Paquette<jpaquette@apple.com>!
rdar://29166825
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26872
llvm-svn: 296418
- Adapt MachineBasicBlock::getName() to have the same behavior as the IR
BasicBlock (Value::getName()).
- Add it to lib/CodeGen/CodeGen.cpp::initializeCodeGen so that it is linked in
the CodeGen library.
- MachineRegionInfoPass's name conflicts with RegionInfoPass's name ("region").
- MachineRegionInfo should depend on MachineDominatorTree,
MachinePostDominatorTree and MachineDominanceFrontier instead of their
respective IR versions.
- Since there were no tests for this, add a X86 MIR test.
Patch by Francis Visoiu Mistrih<fvisoiumistrih@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 295518
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D22666, our current mechanism to
support -pg profiling, where we insert calls to mcount(), or some similar
function, is fundamentally broken. We insert these calls in the frontend, which
means they get duplicated when inlining, and so the accumulated execution
counts for the inlined-into functions are wrong.
Because we don't want the presence of these functions to affect optimizaton,
they should be inserted in the backend. Here's a pass which would do just that.
The knowledge of the name of the counting function lives in the frontend, so
we're passing it here as a function attribute. Clang will be updated to use
this mechanism.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22825
llvm-svn: 280347
Matthias Braun