Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aaron Ballman adc402bf3d Use functions with prototypes when appropriate; NFC
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,

  void func();

becomes

  void func(void);

This is the eleventh batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
2022-02-15 16:06:43 -05:00
Chandler Carruth b322d1e6f0 [PM] Fix up from r290449 to start requiring the x86 target to be
available.

It doesn't seem terribly important to test this with a specific target
triple but without that target available.

llvm-svn: 290451
2016-12-23 21:19:16 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 50f9e893f2 [PM] Introduce options to enable the (still experimental) new pass
manager, and a code path to use it.

The option is actually a top-level option but does contain
'experimental' in the name. This is the compromise suggested by Richard
in discussions. We expect this option will be around long enough and
have enough users towards the end that it merits not being relegated to
CC1, but it still needs to be clear that this option will go away at
some point.

The backend code is a fresh codepath dedicated to handling the flow with
the new pass manager. This was also Richard's suggested code structuring
to essentially leave a clean path for development rather than carrying
complexity or idiosyncracies of how we do things just to share code with
the parts of this in common with the legacy pass manager. And it turns
out, not much is really in common even though we use the legacy pass
manager for codegen at this point.

I've switched a couple of tests to run with the new pass manager, and
they appear to work. There are still plenty of bugs that need squashing
(just with basic experiments I've found two already!) but they aren't in
this code, and the whole point is to expose the necessary hooks to start
experimenting with the pass manager in more realistic scenarios.

That said, I want to *strongly caution* anyone itching to play with
this: it is still *very shaky*. Several large components have not yet
been shaken down. For example I have bugs in both the always inliner and
inliner that I have already spotted and will be fixing independently.

Still, this is a fun milestone. =D

One thing not in this patch (but that might be very reasonable to add)
is some level of support for raw textual pass pipelines such as what
Sean had a patch for some time ago. I'm mostly interested in the more
traditional flow of getting the IR out of Clang and then running it
through opt, but I can see other use cases so someone may want to add
it.

And of course, *many* features are not yet supported!
- O1 is currently more like O2
- None of the sanitizers are wired up
- ObjC ARC optimizer isn't wired up
- ...

So plenty of stuff still lef to do!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28077

llvm-svn: 290450
2016-12-23 20:44:01 +00:00
Chandler Carruth fcd33149b4 Cleanup the handling of noinline function attributes, -fno-inline,
-fno-inline-functions, -O0, and optnone.

These were really, really tangled together:
- We used the noinline LLVM attribute for -fno-inline
  - But not for -fno-inline-functions (breaking LTO)
  - But we did use it for -finline-hint-functions (yay, LTO is happy!)
  - But we didn't for -O0 (LTO is sad yet again...)
- We had weird structuring of CodeGenOpts with both an inlining
  enumeration and a boolean. They interacted in weird ways and
  needlessly.
- A *lot* of set smashing went on with setting these, and then got worse
  when we considered optnone and other inlining-effecting attributes.
- A bunch of inline affecting attributes were managed in a completely
  different place from -fno-inline.
- Even with -fno-inline we failed to put the LLVM noinline attribute
  onto many generated function definitions because they didn't show up
  as AST-level functions.
- If you passed -O0 but -finline-functions we would run the normal
  inliner pass in LLVM despite it being in the O0 pipeline, which really
  doesn't make much sense.
- Lastly, we used things like '-fno-inline' to manipulate the pass
  pipeline which forced the pass pipeline to be much more
  parameterizable than it really needs to be. Instead we can *just* use
  the optimization level to select a pipeline and control the rest via
  attributes.

Sadly, this causes a bunch of churn in tests because we don't run the
optimizer in the tests and check the contents of attribute sets. It
would be awesome if attribute sets were a bit more FileCheck friendly,
but oh well.

I think this is a significant improvement and should remove the semantic
need to change what inliner pass we run in order to comply with the
requested inlining semantics by relying completely on attributes. It
also cleans up tho optnone and related handling a bit.

One unfortunate aspect of this is that for generating alwaysinline
routines like those in OpenMP we end up removing noinline and then
adding alwaysinline. I tried a bunch of other approaches, but because we
recompute function attributes from scratch and don't have a declaration
here I couldn't find anything substantially cleaner than this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28053

llvm-svn: 290398
2016-12-23 01:24:49 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 44d061a471 Add support for /Ob1 and -finline-hint-functions flags
Add support for /Ob1 (and equivalent -finline-hint-functions), which enable
inlining only for functions marked inline, either explicitly (via inline
keyword, for example), or implicitly (function definition in class body,
for example).

This works by enabling inlining pass, and adding noinline attribute to
every function not marked inline.

Patch by Rudy Pons <rudy.pons@ilod.org>!

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20647

llvm-svn: 273440
2016-06-22 16:56:16 +00:00
Hans Wennborg 9464491aa7 Rename test/CodeGen/inline-optim.cc to .c and provide a triple
llvm-svn: 270633
2016-05-24 23:37:56 +00:00