We want to deal with non-default constructors that just happen to
contain constant initializers. There was already a negative test case,
it is now a positive one. We find and refactor this case:
struct PositiveNotDefaultInt {
PositiveNotDefaultInt(int) : i(7) {}
int i;
};
Using bools instead of integers better conveys the expected value of the option.
Reviewed By: Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92652
Summary:
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g.
modernize-use-using.
This helps e.g. when running this check on cppunit client code where the
macro is provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewers: alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32945
llvm-svn: 302429
Oleg Smolsky