[buildbot issues fixed]
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
The docs URL was dangling, and the docs suggested that it has no fixits,
but it actually had.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121372
Document the connection between this checker and the corresponding CERT
rule.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121214
The checker missed a check for a case when the parameter is referenced by an lvalue and this could cause build breakages.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117090
This option allows callers to disable the warning from
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance-move-const-arg.html
that would warn on the following
```
void f(const string &s);
string s;
f(std::move(s)); // ALLOWED if performance-move-const-arg.CheckMoveToConstRef=false
```
The reason people might want to disable this check, is because it allows
callers to use `std::move()` or not based on local reasoning about the
argument, and without having to care about how the function `f` accepts
the argument. Indeed, `f` might accept the argument by const-ref today,
but change to by-value tomorrow, and if the caller had moved the
argument that they were finished with, the code would work as
efficiently as possible regardless of how `f` accepted the parameter.
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119370
This reverts commit 36892727e4 which
breaks the build when LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is enabled with:
CMake Error at cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:683 (add_dependencies):
The dependency target "clang-tidy-headers" of target "CTTestTidyModule"
does not exist.
The check previously inspected only the immediate parent namespace.
`static` in a named namespace within an unnamed namespace is still
redundant.
We will use `Decl::isInAnonymousNamespace()` method that traverses the
namespaces hierarchy recursively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118010
A semicolon-separated list of the names of functions or methods to be considered as not having side-effects was added for bugprone-assert-side-effect. It can be used to exclude methods like iterator::begin/end from being considered as having side-effects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116478
This commit introduces a new check `readability-container-contains` which finds
usages of `container.count()` and `container.find() != container.end()` and
instead recommends the `container.contains()` method introduced in C++20.
For containers which permit multiple entries per key (`multimap`, `multiset`,
...), `contains` is more efficient than `count` because `count` has to do
unnecessary additional work.
While this this performance difference does not exist for containers with only
a single entry per key (`map`, `unordered_map`, ...), `contains` still conveys
the intent better.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, whisperity
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D112646
Looks for duplicate includes and removes them.
Every time an include directive is processed, check a vector of filenames
to see if the included file has already been included. If so, it issues
a warning and a replacement to remove the entire line containing the
duplicated include directive.
When a macro is defined or undefined, the vector of filenames is cleared.
This enables including the same file multiple times, but getting
different expansions based on the set of active macros at the time of
inclusion. For example:
#undef NDEBUG
#include "assertion.h"
// ...code with assertions enabled
#define NDEBUG
#include "assertion.h"
// ...code with assertions disabled
Since macros are redefined between the inclusion of assertion.h,
they are not flagged as redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D7982
Currently the fix hint is hardcoded to gsl::at(). This poses
a problem for people who, for a number of reasons, don't want
or cannot use the GSL library (introducing a new third-party
dependency into a project is not a minor task).
In these situations, the fix hint does more harm than good
as it creates confusion as to what the fix should be. People
can even misinterpret the fix "gsl::at" as e.g. "std::array::at",
which can lead to even more trouble (e.g. when having guidelines
that disallow exceptions).
Furthermore, this is not a requirement from the C++ Core Guidelines.
simply that array indexing needs to be safe. Each project should
be able to decide upon a strategy for safe indexing.
The fix-it is kept for people who want to use the GSL library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117857
Previously, function(nullptr) would have been fixed with function({}). This unfortunately can change overload resolution and even become ambiguous. T(nullptr) was already being fixed with T(""), so this change just brings function calls in line with that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117840
I used a C++ code block in check documentation to show example
output from clang-tidy, but since the example output isn't
kosher C++, sphinx didn't like that when it went to syntax
highlight the block. So switch to a literal block instead
and forego any highlighting.
Fixes build error
<https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/115/builds/21145>
Previously, any macro that didn't look like a varargs macro
or a function style macro was reported with a warning that
it should be replaced with a constexpr const declaration.
This is only reasonable when the macro body contains constants
and not expansions like ",", "[[noreturn]]", "__declspec(xxx)",
etc.
So instead of always issuing a warning about every macro that
doesn't look like a varargs or function style macro, examine the
tokens in the macro and only warn about the macro if it contains
only comment and constant tokens.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116386Fixes#39945
clang-tidy currently reports false positives even for simple cases such as:
```
struct S {
using X = S;
X &operator=(const X&) { return *this; }
};
```
This is due to the fact that the `misc-unconventional-assign-operator` check fails to look at the //canonical// types. This patch fixes this behavior.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, mizvekov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114197
- Recognize older checks that might not end with Check.cpp
- Update list of checks based on improvements to add_new_check
- Fix spelling error in TransformerClangTidyCheck.h
Fixes#52962
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116550
We want to deal with non-default constructors that just happen to
contain constant initializers. There was already a negative test case,
it is now a positive one. We find and refactor this case:
struct PositiveNotDefaultInt {
PositiveNotDefaultInt(int) : i(7) {}
int i;
};
This change adds an option to disable warnings from the
cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions check on integer to floating-
point conversions which may be narrowing.
An example of a case where this might be useful:
```
std::vector<double> v = {1, 2, 3, 4};
double mean = std::accumulate(v.cbegin(), v.cend(), 0.0) / v.size();
```
The conversion from std::size_t to double is technically narrowing on
64-bit systems, but v almost certainly does not have enough elements
for this to be a problem.
This option would allow the cppcoreguidelines-narrowing-conversions
check to be enabled on codebases which might otherwise turn it off
because of cases like the above.
Using XCTAssertEqual on NSString* objects is almost always wrong.
Unfortunately, we have seen a lot of tests doing this and reyling on pointer equality for strings with the same values (which happens to work sometimes - depending on the linker, but this assumption is not guaranteed by the language)
These fixes would make tests less brittle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114975
Checks for various ways that the `const CharT*` constructor of `std::basic_string_view` can be passed a null argument and replaces them with the default constructor in most cases. For the comparison operators, braced initializer list does not compile so instead a call to `.empty()` or the empty string literal are used, where appropriate.
This prevents code from invoking behavior which is unconditionally undefined. The single-argument `const CharT*` constructor does not check for the null case before dereferencing its input. The standard is slated to add an explicitly-deleted overload to catch some of these cases: wg21.link/p2166
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114823 is a companion change to prevent duplicate warnings from the `bugprone-string-constructor` check.
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113148
- Jaro–Winkler and Sørensen–Dice should use en-dashes not regular
dashes. In reStructuredText this is typed as `--`.
- Letters at the beginning of a sentence should be capitalized.
Detect when an identifier contains some Right-To-Left characters.
This pass relates to https://trojansource.codes/
Example of misleading source:
short int א = (short int)0;
short int ג = (short int)12345;
int main() {
int א = ג; // a local variable, set to zero?
printf("ג is %d\n", ג);
printf("א is %d\n", א);
}
This is a recommit of 299aa4dfa1 with missing
option registration fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112914
This reverts commit 7f92a1a84b.
It triggers an assert, see http://45.33.8.238/linux/60293/step_9.txt
"AST/Decl.h:277: llvm::StringRef clang::NamedDecl::getName() const: Assertion `Name.isIdentifier() && "Name is not a simple identifier"' failed."
Suggests switching the initialization pattern of `absl::Cleanup` instances from the factory function to class template argument deduction (CTAD) in C++17 and higher.
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113195
The CERT rule ERR33-C can be modeled partially by the existing check
'bugprone-unused-return-value'. The existing check is reused with
a fixed set of checked functions.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112409
To simplify suppressing warnings (for example, for
when multiple check aliases are enabled).
The globbing format reuses the same code as for
globbing when enabling checks, so the semantics
and behavior is identical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111208
The list of checked functions was incomplete in the description.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, steakhal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111623
Richard