Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sean Fertile 9cd1cdf814 Extend memcpy expansion in Transform/Utils to handle wider operand types.
Adds loop expansions for known-size and unknown-sized memcpy calls, allowing the
target to provide the operand types through TTI callbacks. The default values
for the TTI callbacks use int8 operand types and matches the existing behaviour
if they aren't overridden by the target.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32536

llvm-svn: 307346
2017-07-07 02:00:06 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 32d95742b8 Recommit "r306541 - Add zero-length check to memcpy/memset load store loop expansion""
With fix for use-after-free errors. We can't add the new branch and
remove the old one until we are done with the Builder constructed for
the block.

llvm-svn: 306937
2017-07-01 03:24:10 +00:00
Daniel Jasper 3b704ceba1 Revert "r306541 - Add zero-length check to memcpy/memset load store loop expansion"
Segfaults in non-optimized builds. I'll get a stack trace and a
reproducer to Teresa.

llvm-svn: 306793
2017-06-30 06:37:33 +00:00
Teresa Johnson 538b8d25f0 Add zero-length check to memcpy/memset load store loop expansion
Summary:
I was testing using this expansion logic in other cases besides
NVPTX, and found some runtime failures due to the lack of a check
for a zero length memcpy/memset before the loop. There is already
such a check in the memmove expansion code though.

Reviewers: hfinkel

Subscribers: jholewinski, wdng, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34707

llvm-svn: 306541
2017-06-28 13:07:37 +00:00
Taewook Oh 96c6415697 [DAGCombiner] Fix DebugLoc propagation when folding !(x cc y) -> (x !cc y)
Summary:
Currently, when 't1: i1 = setcc t2, t3, cc' followed by 't4: i1 = xor t1, Constant:i1<-1>' is folded into 't5: i1 = setcc t2, t3 !cc', SDLoc of newly created SDValue 't5' follows SDLoc of 't4', not 't1'. However, as the opcode of newly created SDValue is 'setcc', it make more sense to take DebugLoc from 't1' than 't4'. For the code below

```
extern int bar();
extern int baz();

int foo(int x, int y) {
  if (x != y)
    return bar();
  else
    return baz();
}
```

, following is the bitcode representation of 'foo' at the end of llvm-ir level optimization:

```
define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i32 %y) !dbg !4 {
entry:
  tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %x, i64 0, metadata !9, metadata !11), !dbg !12
  tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 %y, i64 0, metadata !10, metadata !11), !dbg !13
  %cmp = icmp ne i32 %x, %y, !dbg !14
  br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.else, !dbg !16

if.then:                                          ; preds = %entry
  %call = tail call i32 (...) @bar() #3, !dbg !17
  br label %return, !dbg !18

if.else:                                          ; preds = %entry
  %call1 = tail call i32 (...) @baz() #3, !dbg !19
  br label %return, !dbg !20

return:                                           ; preds = %if.else, %if.then
  %retval.0 = phi i32 [ %call, %if.then ], [ %call1, %if.else ]
  ret i32 %retval.0, !dbg !21
}

!14 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 9, scope: !15)
!16 = !DILocation(line: 5, column: 7, scope: !4)

```

As you can see, in 'entry' block, 'icmp' instruction and 'br' instruction have different debug locations. However, with current implementation, there's no distinction between debug locations of these two when they are lowered to asm instructions. This is because 'icmp' and 'br' become 'setcc' 'xor' and 'brcond' in SelectionDAG, where SDLoc of 'setcc' follows the debug location of 'icmp' but SDLOC of 'xor' and 'brcond' follows the debug location of 'br' instruction, and SDLoc of 'xor' overwrites SDLoc of 'setcc' when they are folded. This patch addresses this issue.

Reviewers: atrick, bogner, andreadb, craig.topper, aprantl

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: jlebar, mkuper, jholewinski, andreadb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29813

llvm-svn: 296825
2017-03-02 21:58:35 +00:00
Artem Belevich 29bbdc1c32 [NVPTX] Unify vectorization of load/stores of aggregate arguments and return values.
Original code only used vector loads/stores for explicit vector arguments.
It could also do more loads/stores than necessary (e.g v5f32 would
touch 8 f32 values). Aggregate types were loaded one element at a time,
even the vectors contained within.

This change attempts to generalize (and simplify) parameter space
loads/stores so that vector loads/stores can be used more broadly.
Functionality of the patch has been verified by compiling thrust
test suite and manually checking the differences between PTX
generated by llvm with and without the patch.

General algorithm:
* ComputePTXValueVTs() flattens input/output argument into a flat list
  of scalars to load/store and returns their types and offsets.
* VectorizePTXValueVTs() uses that data to create vectorization plan
  which returns an array of flags marking boundaries of vectorized
  load/stores. Scalars are represented as 1-element vectors.
* Code that generates loads/stores implements a simple state machine
  that constructs a vector according to the plan.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30011

llvm-svn: 295784
2017-02-21 22:56:05 +00:00
Matt Arsenault 8e190b2f23 NVPTX: Fix not preserving volatile when expanding memset
llvm-svn: 293851
2017-02-02 01:20:34 +00:00
Pete Cooper 67cf9a723b Revert "Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments."
This reverts commit r253511.

This likely broke the bots in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787

llvm-svn: 253543
2015-11-19 05:56:52 +00:00
Pete Cooper 72bc23ef02 Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer.  It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.

This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments.  The alignment
argument itself is removed.

There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe.  For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.

For example, code which used to read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)

For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
  (call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
  $1i1 false)

and similarly for memmove and memcpy.

I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.

A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.

In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added.  Instead of calling:
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)

There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool.  This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.

Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen.  I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.

Reviewed by Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 253511
2015-11-18 22:17:24 +00:00
Eli Bendersky b09cfb51ca Use inbounds GEPs for memcpy and memset lowering
Follow-up on discussion in http://reviews.llvm.org/D11220

llvm-svn: 242542
2015-07-17 16:42:33 +00:00
Eli Bendersky f14af16219 Correct lowering of memmove in NVPTX
This fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24056

Also a bit of refactoring along the way.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11220

llvm-svn: 242413
2015-07-16 16:27:19 +00:00
Eli Bendersky 5c0039a014 Actually support volatile memcpys in NVPTX lowering
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11091

llvm-svn: 241914
2015-07-10 15:40:33 +00:00
Eli Bendersky 5c27308a8f Add tests for the NVPTXLowerAggrCopies pass.
Note: not testing memmove lowering for now, as it's broken
[see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24056]

llvm-svn: 241736
2015-07-08 21:29:28 +00:00