These were originally introduced in a copy-paste committed in r351526.
The reference to 't2_so_imm' have been updated to 'imm_com8' so the
comment is now accurate.
Thanks to Eli Friedman for noticing this.
llvm-svn: 351674
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
The CBR instruction is just an ANDI instruction with the immediate
complemented.
Because of this, prior to this change TableGen would warn due to a
decoding conflict.
This commit fixes the existing compilation warning:
===============
[423/492] Building AVRGenDisassemblerTables.inc...
Decoding Conflict:
0111............
01..............
................
ANDIRdK 0111____________
CBRRdK 0111____________
================
After this commit, there are no more decoding conflicts in the AVR
backend's instruction definitions.
Thanks to Eli F for pointing me torward `t2_so_imm_not` as an example of
how to perform a complement in an instruction alias.
Fixes BugZilla PR38802.
llvm-svn: 351526
This is an AVR-specific workaround for a limitation of the register
allocator that only exposes itself on targets with high register
contention like AVR, which only has three pointer registers.
The three pointer registers are X, Y, and Z.
In most nontrivial functions, Y is reserved for the frame pointer,
as per the calling convention. This leaves X and Z. Some instructions,
such as LPM ("load program memory"), are only defined for the Z
register. Sometimes this just leaves X.
When the backend generates a LDDWRdPtrQ instruction with Z as the
destination pointer, it usually trips up the register allocator
with this error message:
LLVM ERROR: ran out of registers during register allocation
This patch is a hacky workaround. We ban the LDDWRdPtrQ instruction
from ever using the Z register as an operand. This gives the
register allocator a bit more space to allocate, fixing the
regalloc exhaustion error.
Here is a description from the patch author Peter Nimmervoll
As far as I understand the problem occurs when LDDWRdPtrQ uses
the ptrdispregs register class as target register. This should work, but
the allocator can't deal with this for some reason. So from my testing,
it seams like (and I might be totally wrong on this) the allocator reserves
the Z register for the ICALL instruction and then the register class
ptrdispregs only has 1 register left and we can't use Y for source and
destination. Removing the Z register from DREGS fixes the problem but
removing Y register does not.
More information about the bug can be found on the avr-rust issue
tracker at https://github.com/avr-rust/rust/issues/37.
A bug has raised to track the removal of this workaround and a proper
fix; PR39553 at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39553.
Patch by Peter Nimmervoll
llvm-svn: 346114
The 'rol Rd' instruction is equivalent to 'adc Rd'.
This caused compile warnings from tablegen because of conflicting bits
shared between each instruction.
llvm-svn: 341275
Before I started maintaining the AVR backend, this instruction
never originally used to have an earlyclobber flag.
Some time afterwards (years ago), I must've added it back in, not realising that it
was left out for a reason.
This pseudo instrction exists solely to work around a long standing bug
in the register allocator.
Before this commit, the LDDWRdYQ pseudo was not actually working around
any bug. With the earlyclobber flag removed again, the LDDWRdYQ pseudo
now correctly works around PR13375 again.
llvm-svn: 326774
Summary: CPI does not read the status register, but only writes it.
Reviewers: dylanmckay
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33223
llvm-svn: 304116
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
We could previously select an integer which would hit an assertion error
in pseudo expansion.
The new type will also generate the appropriate fixups if needed, which
wasn't done beforehand.
llvm-svn: 289192
Dylan McKay