x86 backend currently doesn't know how to handle them.
This doesn't really fix anything because LegalizeTypes doesn't know how to
handle them either. We do get a better error message, though.
llvm-svn: 105305
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
llvm-svn: 104704
A Register with subregisters must also provide SubRegIndices for adressing the
subregisters. TableGen automatically inherits indices for sub-subregisters to
minimize typing.
CompositeIndices may be specified for the weirder cases such as the XMM sub_sd
index that returns the same register, and ARM NEON Q registers where both D
subregs have ssub_0 and ssub_1 sub-subregs.
It is now required that all subregisters are named by an index, and a future
patch will also require inherited subregisters to be named. This is necessary to
allow composite subregister indices to be reduced to a single index.
llvm-svn: 104654
are st(0). These can be encoded using an opcode for storing in st(0) or using
an opcode for storing in st(i), where i can also be 0. To allow testing with
the darwin assembler and get a matching binary the opcode for storing in st(0)
is now used. To do this the same logical trick is use from the darwin assembler
in converting things like this:
fmul %st(0), %st
into this:
fmul %st(0)
by looking for the second operand being X86::ST0 for specific floating point
mnemonics then removing the second X86::ST0 operand. This also has the add
benefit to allow things like:
fmul %st(1), %st
that llvm-mc did not assemble.
llvm-svn: 104634
This passes lit tests, but I'll give it a go through the buildbots to smoke out
any remaining places that depend on the old SubRegIndex numbering.
Then I'll remove NumberHack entirely.
llvm-svn: 104615
structure that represents a mapping without any dependencies on SubRegIndex
numbering.
This brings us closer to being able to remove the explicit SubRegIndex
numbering, and it is now possible to specify any mapping without inventing
*_INVALID register classes.
llvm-svn: 104563
This is the beginning of purely symbolic subregister indices, but we need a bit
of jiggling before the explicit numeric indices can be completely removed.
llvm-svn: 104492
Rafael Espindola