The various CorrectionCandidateCallbacks are currently heap-allocated
unconditionally. This was needed because of delayed typo correction.
However these allocations represent currently 15.4% of all allocations
(number of allocations) when parsing all of Boost (!), mostly because
of ParseCastExpression, ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttrtibutes
and isCXXDeclarationSpecifier. Note that all of these callback objects
are small. Let's not do this.
Instead initially allocate the callback on the stack, and only do a
heap allocation if we are going to do some typo correction. Do this by:
1. Adding a clone function to each callback, which will do a polymorphic
clone of the callback. This clone function is required to be implemented
by every callback (of which there is a fair amount). Make sure this is
the case by making it pure virtual.
2. Use this clone function when we are going to try to correct a typo.
This additionally cut the time of -fsyntax-only on all of Boost by 0.5%
(not that much, but still something). No functional changes intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58827
Reviewed By: rnk
llvm-svn: 356925
Summary:
See the added test for some new cases.
This change also removes special code completion calls inside the
ParseExpressionList function now that we properly propagate expected
type to the function responsible for parsing elements of the expression list
(ParseAssignmentExpression).
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: xbolva00, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58541
llvm-svn: 354864
Preferred types are used by code completion for ranking. This commit
considerably increases the number of points in code where those types
are propagated.
In order to avoid complicating signatures of Parser's methods, a
preferred type is kept as a member variable in the parser and updated
during parsing.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56723
llvm-svn: 352788
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Rather than duplicating data fields, use DeclSpec directly to store
the qualifiers for the functions/methods. This change doesn't handle
attributes yet and has to be extended further.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55948
llvm-svn: 350703
Summary:
clang has `-Wextra-semi` (D43162), which is not dictated by the currently selected standard.
While that is great, there is at least one more source of need-less semis - 'null statements'.
Sometimes, they are needed:
```
for(int x = 0; continueToDoWork(x); x++)
; // Ugly code, but the semi is needed here.
```
But sometimes they are just there for no reason:
```
switch(X) {
case 0:
return -2345;
case 5:
return 0;
default:
return 42;
}; // <- oops
;;;;;;;;;;; <- OOOOPS, still not diagnosed. Clearly this is junk.
```
Additionally:
```
if(; // <- empty init-statement
true)
;
switch (; // empty init-statement
x) {
...
}
for (; // <- empty init-statement
int y : S())
;
}
As usual, things may or may not go sideways in the presence of macros.
While evaluating this diag on my codebase of interest, it was unsurprisingly
discovered that Google Test macros are *very* prone to this.
And it seems many issues are deep within the GTest itself, not
in the snippets passed from the codebase that uses GTest.
So after some thought, i decided not do issue a diagnostic if the semi
is within *any* macro, be it either from the normal header, or system header.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39111 | PR39111 ]]
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, efriedma
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52695
llvm-svn: 347339
We haven't supported compiling ObjC1 for a long time (and never will again), so
there isn't any reason to keep these separate. This patch replaces
LangOpts::ObjC1 and LangOpts::ObjC2 with LangOpts::ObjC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53547
llvm-svn: 345637
Summary:
Currently CodeCompleteCall only gets called after a comma or parantheses. This
patch makes sure it is called even at the cases like:
```foo(1^);```
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51038
llvm-svn: 341824
Summary:
Code completion in clang is actually a mix of two features:
- Code completion is a familiar feature. Results are exposed via the
CodeCompleteConsumer::ProcessCodeCompleteResults callback.
- Signature help figures out if the current expression is an argument of
some function call and shows corresponding signatures if so.
Results are exposed via CodeCompleteConsumer::ProcessOverloadCandidates.
This patch refactors the implementation to untangle those two from each
other and makes some naming tweaks to avoid confusion when reading the
code.
The refactoring is required for signature help fixes, see D51038.
The only intended behavior change is the order of callbacks.
ProcessOverloadCandidates is now called before ProcessCodeCompleteResults.
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51782
llvm-svn: 341660
This diff adds a fixit to suggest removing unused lambda captures
in the appropriate diagnostic.
Patch by Andrew Comminos!
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48845
llvm-svn: 337148
Basically, "AttributeList" loses all list-like mechanisms, ParsedAttributes is
switched to use a TinyPtrVector (and a ParsedAttributesView is created to
have a non-allocating attributes list). DeclaratorChunk gets the later kind,
Declarator/DeclSpec keep ParsedAttributes.
Iterators are added to the ParsedAttribute types so that for-loops work.
llvm-svn: 336945
binary operator.
Factor out the checking for a comma within potential angle brackets and
also call it from contexts where we parse a comma-separated list of
arguments or initializers.
llvm-svn: 335699
We track when we see a name-shaped expression followed by a '<' token
and parse the '<' as a comparison. Then:
* if we see a token sequence that cannot possibly be an expression but
can be a template argument (in particular, a type-id) that follows
either a ',' or the '<', diagnose that the '<' was supposed to start
a template argument list, and
* if we see '>()', diagnose that the '<' was supposed to start a
template argument list.
This only changes the diagnostic for error cases, and in practice
appears to catch the most common cases where a missing 'template'
keyword leads to parse errors within a template.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48571
llvm-svn: 335687
members of dependent contexts.
This permits cases where the names before and after the '::' in a
dependent inherited constructor using-declaration do not match, but
where we can nonetheless tell when parsing the template that a
constructor is being named. Under (open) core language DR 2070, such
cases will probably be ill-formed, but r335182 does not quite give
that result and didn't intend to change this, so restore the old
behavior for now.
llvm-svn: 335381
Diagnose the name of the class being shadowed by using declarations, and
improve the diagnostics for the case where the name of the class is
shadowed by a non-static data member in a class with constructors. In
the latter case, we now always give the "member with the same name as
its class" diagnostic regardless of the relative order of the member and
the constructor, rather than giving an inscrutible diagnostic if the
constructor appears second.
llvm-svn: 335182
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'"
diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not
followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a
template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template.
Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent
if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only
non-templates.
llvm-svn: 332076
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
This is not yet part of any C++ working draft, and so is controlled by the flag
-fchar8_t rather than a -std= flag. (The GCC implementation is controlled by a
flag with the same name.)
This implementation is experimental, and will be removed or revised
substantially to match the proposal as it makes its way through the C++
committee.
llvm-svn: 331244
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
Summary:
This fixes [PR35381](https://llvm.org/pr35381) and an additional bug where clang didn't warn about the C++17 extension when having an expression in the init statement.
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for contributing the patch.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40445
llvm-svn: 327782
When parsing C++ type construction expressions with list initialization,
forward the locations of the braces to Sema.
Without these locations, the code coverage pass crashes on the given test
case, because the pass relies on getLocEnd() returning a valid location.
Here is what this patch does in more detail:
- Forwards init-list brace locations to Sema (ParseExprCXX),
- Builds an InitializationKind with these locations (SemaExprCXX), and
- Uses these locations for constructor initialization (SemaInit).
The remaining changes fall out of introducing a new overload for
creating direct-list InitializationKinds.
Testing: check-clang, and a stage2 coverage-enabled build of clang with
asserts enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41921
llvm-svn: 322729
- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
llvm-svn: 321628
- Since these enums are used as bit-fields - for the bit-fields to be interpreted as unsigned, the underlying type must be specified as unsigned.
Previous failed attempt - wherein I did not specify an underlying type - was the sum of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321614https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321615
llvm-svn: 321622
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
llvm-svn: 321616
Summary:
This feature was discussed but not yet proposed. It allows a structured binding to appear as a //condition//
if (auto [ok, val] = f(...))
So the user can save an extra //condition// if the statement can test the value to-be-decomposed instead. Formally, it makes the value of the underlying object of the structured binding declaration also the value of a //condition// that is an initialized declaration.
Considering its logicality which is entirely evident from its trivial implementation, I think it might be acceptable to land it as an extension for now before I write the paper.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39284
llvm-svn: 320011
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
llvm-svn: 312794
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
llvm-svn: 312781
This is the same assertion as in https://reviews.llvm.org/D25206 that is
triggered when RecordLayoutBuilder tries to compute the size of a field
(for capture "typo_boo" in the test case) whose type hasn't been
deduced.
The fix is to add CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr call to the cases when we
aren't disambiguating between an Obj-C message send and a lambda
expression.
rdar://problem/31760839
Reviewers: rsmith, ahatanak
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36853
llvm-svn: 311480
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
A refactoring of TemplateIdAnnotation that uses TrailingObjects to create a variably-sized object on the heap.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31414
Thanks to Aaron B for the review!
llvm-svn: 303594
Bruno Ricci