This prevents functions accessing varargs from being inlined if they
have the alwaysinline attribute.
Reviewers: efriedma, rnk, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42556
llvm-svn: 323619
Summary:
After teaching InlineCost more about address spaces ()
another fault was detected in the inliner. If an argument has
the byval attribute the parameter might be copied to an alloca.
That part seems to work fine even if the argument has a different
address space than the alloca address space. However, if the
address spaces differ, then the inlined function still might
refer to the parameter using the original address space (the
inliner does not handle that situation very well).
This patch avoids the problem by simply disallowing inlining
when there are byval arguments with address space that differs
from the alloca address space.
I'm not really sure how to transform the code if we want to
get inlining for this situation. I assume that it never has
been working, and that the fixes in r321809 just exposed an
old problem.
Fault found by skatkov (Serguei Katkov). It is mentioned in
follow up comments to https://reviews.llvm.org/D40455.
Reviewers: skatkov
Reviewed By: skatkov
Subscribers: uabelho, eraman, llvm-commits, haicheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41898
llvm-svn: 322181
If the varargs are not accessed by a function, we can inline the
function.
Reviewers: dblaikie, chandlerc, davide, efriedma, rnk, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41335
llvm-svn: 321940
Summary:
I basically copied this patch from here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D1251
But I skipped some of the refactoring to make the patch more clean.
The new outer3/inner3 test case in ptr-diff.ll triggers the
following assert without this patch:
lib/IR/Constants.cpp:1834: static llvm::Constant *llvm::ConstantExpr::getCompare(unsigned short, llvm::Constant *, llvm::Constant *, bool): Assertion `C1->getType() == C2->getType() && "Op types should be identical!"' failed.
The other new test cases makes sure that there is code coverage
for all modifications in InlineCost.cpp (getting different values
due to not fetching sizes for address space zero). I only guarantee
code coverage for those tests. The tests are not written in a way
that they would break if not having the corrections in
InlineCost.cpp. I found it quite hard to fine tune the tests into
getting different results based on the pointer sizes (except for
the test case where we hit an assert if not teaching InlineCost
about address spaces).
Reviewers: chandlerc, arsenm, haicheng
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, eraman, llvm-commits, haicheng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40455
llvm-svn: 321809
Currently, inline cost model considers a binary operator as free only if both
its operands are constants. Some simple cases are missing such as a + 0, a - a,
etc. This patch modifies visitBinaryOperator() to call SimplifyBinOp() without
going through simplifyInstruction() to get rid of the constant restriction.
Thus, visitAnd() and visitOr() are not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41494
llvm-svn: 321366
The penalty is currently getting applied in a bunch of places where it
doesn't make sense, like bitcasts (which are free) and calls (which
were getting the call penalty applied twice). Instead, just apply the
penalty to binary operators and floating-point casts.
While I'm here, also fix getFPOpCost() to do the right thing in more
cases, so we don't have to dig into function attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41522
llvm-svn: 321332
SROA analysis of InlineCost can figure out that some stores can be removed
after inlining and then the repeated loads clobbered by these stores are also
free. This patch finds these clobbered loads and adjust the inline cost
accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33946
llvm-svn: 320814
This patch fix this FIXME in visitPHI()
FIXME: We should potentially be tracking values through phi nodes,
especially when they collapse to a single value due to deleted CFG edges
during inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38594
llvm-svn: 320699
Summary:
This is LLVM instrumentation for the new HWASan tool. It is basically
a stripped down copy of ASan at this point, w/o stack or global
support. Instrumenation adds a global constructor + runtime callbacks
for every load and store.
HWASan comes with its own IR attribute.
A brief design document can be found in
clang/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.rst (submitted earlier).
Reviewers: kcc, pcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, mehdi_amini, mgorny, javed.absar, eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40932
llvm-svn: 320217
These are blocks that haven't not been executed during training. For large
projects this could make a significant difference. For the project, I was
looking at, I got an order of magnitude decrease in the size of the total YAML
files with this and r319235.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40678
Re-commit after fixing the failing testcase in rL319576, rL319577 and
rL319578.
llvm-svn: 319581
These are blocks that haven't not been executed during training. For large
projects this could make a significant difference. For the project, I was
looking at, I got an order of magnitude decrease in the size of the total YAML
files with this and r319235.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40678
llvm-svn: 319556
enum TailCallKind { TCK_None = 0, TCK_Tail = 1, TCK_MustTail = 2,
TCK_NoTail = 3 };
TCK_NoTail is greater than TCK_Tail so taking the min does not do the
correct thing.
rdar://35639547
llvm-svn: 319075
Test needs some slight adjustment because we no longer check the existence of
BFI but rather that the actual hotness is set on the remark. If entry_count
is not set getBlockProfileCount returns None.
llvm-svn: 314874
InlineCost can understand Select IR now. This patch finds free Select IRs and
continue the propagation of SimplifiedValues, ConstantOffsetPtrs, and
SROAArgValues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37198
llvm-svn: 314307
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
This change simplifies code that has to deal with
DIGlobalVariableExpression and mirrors how we treat DIExpressions in
debug info intrinsics. Before this change there were two ways of
representing empty expressions on globals, a nullptr and an empty
!DIExpression().
If someone needs to upgrade out-of-tree testcases:
perl -pi -e 's/(!DIGlobalVariableExpression\(var: ![0-9]*)\)/\1, expr: !DIExpression())/g' <MYTEST.ll>
will catch 95%.
llvm-svn: 312144
Summary: We need to have accurate-sample-profile in function attribute so that it works with LTO.
Reviewers: davidxl, rsmith
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, javed.absar, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37113
llvm-svn: 311706
Summary: This patch adds test to cover the logic guarded by "accurate-sample-profile" flag.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37084
llvm-svn: 311618
Summary:
Most DIExpressions are empty or very simple. When they are complex, they
tend to be unique, so checking them inline is reasonable.
This also avoids the need for CodeGen passes to append to the
llvm.dbg.mir named md node.
See also PR22780, for making DIExpression not be an MDNode.
Reviewers: aprantl, dexonsmith, dblaikie
Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37075
llvm-svn: 311594
Summary:
This updates the Inliner to only add a single Optimization
Remark when Inlining, rather than an Analysis Remark and an
Optimization Remark.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33786
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, chandlerc
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: haicheng, fhahn, mehdi_amini, dblaikie, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36054
llvm-svn: 311349
Summary:
This updates the Inliner to only add a single Optimization
Remark when Inlining, rather than an Analysis Remark and an
Optimization Remark.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33786
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, chandlerc
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: haicheng, fhahn, mehdi_amini, dblaikie, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36054
llvm-svn: 311273
a function into itself.
We tried to fix this before in r306495 but that got reverted as the
assert was actually hit.
This fixes the original bug (which we seem to have lost track of with
the revert) by blocking a second remapping when the function being
inlined is also the caller and the remapping could succeed but
erroneously.
The included test case would actually load from an inlined copy of the
alloca before this change, failing to load the stored value and
miscompiling.
Many thanks to Richard Smith for diagnosing a user miscompile to this
bug, and to Kyle for the first attempt and initial analysis and David Li
for remembering the issue and how to fix it and suggesting the patch.
I'm just stitching it together and landing it. =]
llvm-svn: 311229
localized to the code that uses those analyses.
Technically, this can change behavior as we no longer require the
existence of the ProfileSummaryInfo analysis to use local profile
information via BFI. We didn't actually require the PSI to have an
interesting profile though, so this only really impacts the behavior in
non-default pass pipelines.
IMO, this makes it substantially less surprising how everything works --
before an analysis that wasn't actually used had to exist to trigger
*any* profile aware inlining. I think the new organization makes it more
obvious where various checks for profile signals happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36710
llvm-svn: 310888
Summary:
This is largely NFC*, in preparation for utilizing ProfileSummaryInfo
and BranchFrequencyInfo analyses. In this patch I am only doing the
splitting for the New PM, but I can do the same for the legacy PM as
a follow-on if this looks good.
*Not NFC since for partial unrolling we lose the updates done to the
loop traversal (adding new sibling and child loops) - according to
Chandler this is not very useful for partial unrolling, but it also
means that the debugging flag -unroll-revisit-child-loops no longer
works for partial unrolling.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36157
llvm-svn: 309886
infinite-inlining across multiple runs of the inliner by keeping a tiny
history of internal-to-SCC inlining decisions.
This is still a bit gross, but I don't yet have any fundamentally better
ideas and numerous people are blocked on this to use new PM and ThinLTO
together.
The core of the idea is to detect when we are about to do an inline that
has a chance of re-splitting an SCC which we have split before with
a similar inlining step. That is a critical component in the inlining
forming a cycle and so far detects all of the various cyclic patterns
I can come up with as well as the original real-world test case (which
comes from a ThinLTO build of libunwind).
I've added some tests that I think really demonstrate what is going on
here. They are essentially state machines that march the inliner through
various steps of a cycle and check that we stop when the cycle is closed
and that we actually did do inlining to form that cycle.
A lot of thanks go to Eric Christopher and Sanjoy Das for the help
understanding this issue and improving the test cases.
The biggest "yuck" here is the layering issue -- the CGSCC pass manager
is providing somewhat magical state to the inliner for it to use to make
itself converge. This isn't great, but I don't honestly have a lot of
better ideas yet and at least seems nicely isolated.
I have tested this patch, and it doesn't block *any* inlining on the
entire LLVM test suite and SPEC, so it seems sufficiently narrowly
targeted to the issue at hand.
We have come up with hypothetical issues that this patch doesn't cover,
but so far none of them are practical and we don't have a viable
solution yet that covers the hypothetical stuff, so proceeding here in
the interim. Definitely an area that we will be back and revisiting in
the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36188
llvm-svn: 309784
Summary:
Inlining threshold is increased by application of bonuses when the
callee has a single reachable basic block or is rich in vector
instructions. Similarly, inlining cost is reduced by applying a large
bonus when the last call to a static function is considered for
inlining. This patch disables the application of these bonuses when the
callsite or the callee is cold. The intention here is to prevent a large
cold callsite from being inlined to a non-cold caller that could prevent
the caller from being inlined. This is especially important when the
cold callsite is a last call to a static since the associated bonus is
very high.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl
Subscribers: danielcdh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35823
llvm-svn: 309441
There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
llvm-svn: 309426
Now, getUserCost() only checks the src and dst types of EXT to decide it is free
or not. This change first checks the types, then calls isExtFreeImpl(), and
check if EXT can form ExtLoad at last. Currently, only AArch64 has customized
implementation of isExtFreeImpl() to check if EXT can be folded into its use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34458
llvm-svn: 308076
Summary:
Similar to X86, it should be safe to inline callees if their
target-features are a subset of the caller. As some subtarget features
provide different instructions depending on whether they are set or
unset (e.g. ThumbMode and ModeSoftFloat), we use a whitelist of
target-features describing hardware capabilities only.
Reviewers: kristof.beyls, rengolin, t.p.northover, SjoerdMeijer, peter.smith, silviu.baranga, efriedma
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer, efriedma
Subscribers: dschuff, efriedma, aemerson, sdardis, javed.absar, arichardson, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34697
llvm-svn: 307889
invalidation of analyses when merging SCCs.
While I've added a bunch of testing of this, it takes something much
more like the inliner to really trigger this as you need to have
partially-analyzed SCCs with updates at just the right time. So I've
added a direct test for this using the inliner and verifying the
domtree. Without the changes here, this test ends up finding a stale
dominator tree.
However, to handle this properly, we need to invalidate analyses
*before* merging the SCCs. After talking to Philip and Sanjoy about this
they convinced me this was the right approach. To do this, we need
a callback mechanism when merging SCCs so we can observe the cycle that
will be merged before the merge happens. This API update ended up being
surprisingly easy.
With this commit, the new PM passes the test-suite again. It hadn't
since MemorySSA was enabled for EarlyCSE as that also will find this bug
very quickly.
llvm-svn: 307498
the invalidation propagation logic from an SCC to a Function.
I wrote the infrastructure to test this but didn't actually use it in
the unit test where it was designed to be used. =[ My bad. Once
I actually added it to the test case I discovered that it also hadn't
been properly implemented, so I've implemented it. The logic in the FAM
proxy for an SCC pass to propagate invalidation follows the same ideas
as the FAM proxy for a Module pass, but the implementation is a bit
different to reflect the fact that it is forwarding just for an SCC.
However, implementing this correctly uncovered a surprising "bug" (it
was conservatively correct but relatively very expensive) in how we
handle invalidation when splitting one SCC into multiple SCCs. We did an
eager invalidation when in reality we should be deferring invaliadtion
for the *current* SCC to the CGSCC pass manager and just invaliating the
newly constructed SCCs. Otherwise we end up invalidating too much too
soon. This was exposed by the inliner test case that I've updated. Now,
we invalidate *just* the split off '(test1_f)' SCC when doing the CG
update, and then the inliner finishes and invalidates the '(test1_g,
test1_h)' SCC's analyses. The first few attempts at fixing this hit
still more bugs, but all of those are covered by existing tests. For
example, the inliner should also preserve the FAM proxy to avoid
unnecesasry invalidation, and this is safe because the CG update
routines it uses handle any necessary adjustments to the FAM proxy.
Finally, the unittests for the CGSCC pass manager needed a bunch of
updates where we weren't correctly preserving the FAM proxy because it
hadn't been fully implemented and failing to preserve it didn't matter.
Note that this doesn't yet fix the current crasher due to MemSSA finding
a stale dominator tree, but without this the fix to that crasher doesn't
really make any sense when testing because it relies on the proxy
behavior.
llvm-svn: 307487
This commit pretty much rolls back the logic added in r306495
as in the testcase provided we simplify an `icmp` looking through
a PHI that hasn't been mapped yet.
I think instsimplify shouldn't do threading over select/phis or
just looking through phis in general, but this is what we have
now. Also, add a test to prevent this from happening in case somebody
wants to modify this code again.
Briefly discussed with Kyle Butt (thanks Kyle!).
llvm-svn: 306938
Summary:
Add an option to prevent diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for
large codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size. Discussion of
this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: qcolombet, javed.absar, fhahn, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867
llvm-svn: 306912
Summary: visitSwitchInst should not take INT_MAX when Cost is negative. Instead of INT_MAX , we also use a valid upperbound cost when overflow occurs in Cost.
Reviewers: hans, echristo, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: mcrosier, javed.absar, llvm-commits, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34436
llvm-svn: 306118
Also document the attribute, since "probe-stack" already is.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34528
llvm-svn: 306069
This attribute is used to ensure the guard page is triggered on stack
overflow. Stack frames larger than the guard page size will generate
a call to __probestack to touch each page so the guard page won't
be skipped.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34386
llvm-svn: 305939
Hiroshi Inoue