packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
This reinstates r362358 (reverted in r362375) with a fix for an
uninitialized variable use in UpdateMarkingForLValueToRValue.
llvm-svn: 362531
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
........
Fixes http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win buildbot failures
llvm-svn: 362375
packs.
Two changes:
* Track odr-use via FunctionParmPackExprs to properly handle dependent
odr-uses of packs in generic lambdas.
* Do not instantiate implicit captures; instead, regenerate them by
instantiating the body of the lambda. This is necessary to
distinguish between cases where only one element of a pack is
captured and cases where the entire pack is captured.
llvm-svn: 362358
the captured region scope.
This removes a case where we would build expressions (and mark
declarations odr-used) in the wrong scope.
Remove the now-unused 'capture initializer' field on sema::Capture
(except for 'this' captures, which still need to be cleaned up).
No functionality change intended (except that we now very slightly more
precisely determine whether we need to use a capture or not when another
captured region encloses an OpenMP captured region).
llvm-svn: 362179
capturing expression or statement.
No functionality change yet. The intent is that we will also delay
building the initialization expression until the enclosing context, so
that:
a) we build the initialization expression in the right context, and
b) we can elide captures that are not odr-used, as suggested by P0588R1.
This also consolidates some duplicated code building capture fields into
a single place.
llvm-svn: 361893
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
from those that aren't.
This patch changes the way __block variables that aren't captured by
escaping blocks are handled:
- Since non-escaping blocks on the stack never get copied to the heap
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D49303), Sema shouldn't error out when
the type of a non-escaping __block variable doesn't have an accessible
copy constructor.
- IRGen doesn't have to use the specialized byref structure (see
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.html#id8) for a
non-escaping __block variable anymore. Instead IRGen can emit the
variable as a normal variable and copy the reference to the block
literal. Byref copy/dispose helpers aren't needed either.
This reapplies r343518 after fixing a use-after-free bug in function
Sema::ActOnBlockStmtExpr where the BlockScopeInfo was dereferenced after
it was popped and deleted.
rdar://problem/39352313
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51564
llvm-svn: 343542
from those that aren't.
This patch changes the way __block variables that aren't captured by
escaping blocks are handled:
- Since non-escaping blocks on the stack never get copied to the heap
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D49303), Sema shouldn't error out when
the type of a non-escaping __block variable doesn't have an accessible
copy constructor.
- IRGen doesn't have to use the specialized byref structure (see
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.html#id8) for a
non-escaping __block variable anymore. Instead IRGen can emit the
variable as a normal variable and copy the reference to the block
literal. Byref copy/dispose helpers aren't needed either.
This reapplies r341754, which was reverted in r341757 because it broke a
couple of bots. r341754 was calling markEscapingByrefs after the call to
PopFunctionScopeInfo, which caused the popped function scope to be
cleared out when the following code was compiled, for example:
$ cat test.m
struct A {
id data[10];
};
void foo() {
__block A v;
^{ (void)v; };
}
This commit calls markEscapingByrefs before calling PopFunctionScopeInfo
to prevent that from happening.
rdar://problem/39352313
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51564
llvm-svn: 343518
from those that aren't.
This patch changes the way __block variables that aren't captured by
escaping blocks are handled:
- Since non-escaping blocks on the stack never get copied to the heap
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D49303), Sema shouldn't error out when
the type of a non-escaping __block variable doesn't have an accessible
copy constructor.
- IRGen doesn't have to use the specialized byref structure (see
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.html#id8) for a
non-escaping __block variable anymore. Instead IRGen can emit the
variable as a normal variable and copy the reference to the block
literal. Byref copy/dispose helpers aren't needed either.
rdar://problem/39352313
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51564
llvm-svn: 341754
Summary:
Use corutine function arguments to initialize a promise type, but only
if the promise type defines a constructor that takes those arguments.
Otherwise, fall back to the default constructor.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: toby-allsopp, lewissbaker, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41820
llvm-svn: 323381
Summary:
Some coroutine diagnostics need to point to the location of the first coroutine keyword in the function, like when diagnosing a `return` inside a coroutine. Previously we did this by storing each *valid* coroutine statement in a list and select the first one to use in diagnostics. However if every coroutine statement is invalid we would have no location to point to.
This patch fixes the storage of the first coroutine statement location, ensuring that it gets stored even when the resulting AST node would be invalid.
This patch also removes the `CoroutineStmts` list in `FunctionScopeInfo` because it was unused.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30776
llvm-svn: 297547
Summary:
The changes contained in this patch are:
1. Defines a new AST node `CoawaitDependentExpr` for representing co_await expressions while the promise type is still dependent.
2. Correctly detect and transform the 'co_await' operand to `p.await_transform(<expr>)` when possible.
3. Change the initial/final suspend points to build during the initial parse, so they have the correct operator co_await lookup results.
4. Fix transformation of the CoroutineBodyStmt so that it doesn't re-build the final/initial suspends.
@rsmith: This change is a little big, but it's not trivial for me to split it up. Please let me know if you would prefer this submitted as multiple patches.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: ABataev, rsmith, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26057
llvm-svn: 297093
This commit adds a traversal of the AST after Sema of a function that diagnoses
unguarded references to declarations that are partially available (based on
availability attributes). This traversal is only done when we would otherwise
emit -Wpartial-availability.
This commit is part of a feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23003
llvm-svn: 278826
IsExact shouldn't be set to true in WeakObjectProfileTy::getBaseInfo
when the receiver is a class because having a class as the receiver
doesn't guarantee that the Base is exact.
This is a follow-up to r263818.
rdar://problem/25208167
llvm-svn: 264025
The crash occurs in WeakObjectProfileTy::getBaseInfo when getBase() is
called on an ObjCPropertyRefExpr object whose receiver is an interface.
This commit fixes the crash by checking the type of the receiver and
setting IsExact to true if it is an interface.
rdar://problem/25208167
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18268
llvm-svn: 263818
Add parsing, sema analysis and serialization/deserialization for 'declare reduction' construct.
User-defined reductions are defined as
#pragma omp declare reduction( reduction-identifier : typename-list : combiner ) [initializer ( initializer-expr )]
These custom reductions may be used in 'reduction' clauses of OpenMP constructs. The combiner specifies how partial results can be combined into a single value. The
combiner can use the special variable identifiers omp_in and omp_out that are of the type of the variables being reduced with this reduction-identifier. Each of them will
denote one of the values to be combined before executing the combiner. It is assumed that the special omp_out identifier will refer to the storage that holds the resulting
combined value after executing the combiner.
As the initializer-expr value of a user-defined reduction is not known a priori the initializer-clause can be used to specify one. Then the contents of the initializer-clause
will be used as the initializer for private copies of reduction list items where the omp_priv identifier will refer to the storage to be initialized. The special identifier
omp_orig can also appear in the initializer-clause and it will refer to the storage of the original variable to be reduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11182
llvm-svn: 262582
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
Partly addressed by r244843, but the explicit dtor in LambdaScopeInfo
was still thwarting the implicit copy ctor. This does remove the key
function from LambdaScopeInfo unfortunately, but it seems neater than
having to explicitly default any special members LambdaScopeInfo needs.
llvm-svn: 244957
This check does not apply when Borland extensions are enabled, as they
have a checked in test case indicating that mixed usage of SEH and C++
is supported.
llvm-svn: 227876
nonnull attribute when comparison is always true/false.
Original patch by Steven Wu. I have added extra code to prevent issuing of
warning when the nonnull parameter is modified prior to the comparison.
This addition prevents false positives in the most obvious cases.
There may still be false positive warnings in some cases (as one of my tests
indicates), but benefit far outweighs such cases. rdar://18712242
llvm-svn: 222264
An updated implemnentation of VLA types capturing based on previously committed solution for Lambdas.
This version captures the whole VLA type instead of particular variables which are part of VLA size expression and allows to use previusly calculated size of VLA type in captured regions. Required for OpenMP.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5099
llvm-svn: 220850
IBOutlet and weak attributes when accessed being
unpredictably set to nil because usage of such properties
are always single threaded and its ivar cannot be set
to nil asynchronously. // rdar://15885642
llvm-svn: 211132
Employed the following refactorings:
- Renamed some functions
- Introduced explaining variables
- Cleaned up & added comments
- Used Optional<unsigned> for return value instead of an out parameter
- Added assertions
- Constified a few member functions
No functionality change.
All regressions pass.
llvm-svn: 196662
super another initializer and when the implementation does not delegate to
another initializer via a call on 'self'.
A secondary initializer is an initializer method not marked as a designated
initializer within a class that has at least one initializer marked as a
designated initializer.
llvm-svn: 196318
Also - others have complained about some white space issues - sorry about that - continues to be a pain point for me - will try and see what I can do with clang-format this evening after work - as a short term fix, if anyone can email me the files that they have already identified with issues, it would help me speed up a focused fix. sorry.
llvm-svn: 194206
Both Richard and I felt that the current wording in the working paper needed some tweaking - Please see http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2035 for additional context and references to core-reflector messages that discuss wording tweaks.
What is implemented is what we had intended to specify in Bristol; but, recently felt that the specification might benefit from some tweaking and fleshing.
As a rough attempt to explain the semantics: If a nested lambda with a default-capture names a variable within its body, and if the enclosing full expression that contains the name of that variable is instantiation-dependent - then an enclosing lambda that is capture-ready (i.e. within a non-dependent context) must capture that variable, if all intervening nested lambdas can potentially capture that variable if they need to, and all intervening parent lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can and do capture the variable.
Of note, 'this' capturing is also currently underspecified in the working paper for generic lambdas. What is implemented here is if the set of candidate functions in a nested generic lambda includes both static and non-static member functions (regardless of viability checking - i.e. num and type of parameters/arguments) - and if all intervening nested-inner lambdas between the capture-ready lambda and the function-call containing nested lambda can capture 'this' and if all enclosing lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can capture 'this', then 'this' is speculatively captured by that capture-ready lambda.
Hopefully a paper for the C++ committee (that Richard and I had started some preliminary work on) is forthcoming.
This essentially makes generic lambdas feature complete, except for known bugs. The more prominent ones (and the ones I am currently aware of) being:
- generic lambdas and init-captures are broken - but a patch that fixes this is already in the works ...
- nested variadic expansions such as:
auto K = [](auto ... OuterArgs) {
vp([=](auto ... Is) {
decltype(OuterArgs) OA = OuterArgs;
return 0;
}(5)...);
return 0;
};
auto M = K('a', ' ', 1, " -- ", 3.14);
currently cause crashes. I think I know how to fix this (since I had done so in my initial implementation) - but it will probably take some work and back & forth with Doug and Richard.
A warm thanks to all who provided feedback - and especially to Doug Gregor and Richard Smith for their pivotal guidance: their insight and prestidigitation in such matters is boundless!
Now let's hope this commit doesn't upset the buildbot gods ;)
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 194188
Add CapturedDecl to be the DeclContext for CapturedStmt, and perform semantic
analysis. Currently captures all variables by reference.
TODO: templates
Author: Ben Langmuir <ben.langmuir@intel.com>
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D433
llvm-svn: 179618
Previously, [foo weakProp] was not being treated the same as foo.weakProp.
Now, for every explicit message send, we check if it's a property access,
and if so, if the property is weak. Then for every assignment of a
message, we have to do the same thing again.
This is a potentially expensive increase because determining whether a
method is a property accessor requires searching through the methods it
overrides. However, without it -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak will miss cases
from people who prefer not to use dot syntax. If this turns out to be
too expensive, we can try caching the result somewhere, or even lose
precision by not checking superclass methods. The warning is off-by-default,
though.
<rdar://problem/12407765>
llvm-svn: 165718
The infrastructure for -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak got a little too heavy
to leave sitting at the top of Sema.cpp.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 164856
Richard Smith