Summary:
The exclusive-claim model is successful at resolving conflicts over tokens
between parent/child or siblings. However claims at the spelled-token
level do the wrong thing for macro expansions, where siblings can be
equally associated with the macro invocation.
Moreover, any model that only uses the endpoints in a range can fail when
a macro invocation occurs inside the node.
To address this, we use the existing TokenBuffer in more depth.
Claims are expressed in terms of expanded tokens, so there is no need to worry
about macros, includes etc.
Once we know which expanded tokens were claimed, they are mapped onto
spelled tokens for hit-testing.
This mapping is fairly flexible, currently the handling of macros is
pretty simple (map macro args onto spellings, other macro expansions onto the
macro name token).
This mapping is in principle token-by-token for correctness (though
there's some batching for performance).
The aggregation of the selection enum is now more principled as we need to be
able to aggregate several hit-test results together.
For simplicity i removed the ability to determine selectedness of TUDecl.
(That was originally implemented in 90a5bf92ff97b1, but doesn't seem to be very
important or worth the complexity any longer).
The expandedTokens(SourceLocation) helper could be added locally, but seems to
make sense on TokenBuffer.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/202
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/126
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70512
Summary: This would make go-to-def works on the cases like int A = abc^;
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70807
Summary:
For the constructor Foo() : classmember(arg) {}
The AST looks like:
- CXXCtorInitializer classmember(arg)
- CXXConstructExpr classmember(arg)
- DeclRefExpr: arg
We want the 'classmember' to be associated with the CXXCtorInitializer, not the
CXXConstructExpr. (CXXConstructExpr is known to have bad ranges).
So just early-claim it.
Thanks @hokein for tracking down/reducing the bug.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits, hokein
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70312
Summary:
The DeclRefExpr for the callee of overloaded `operator()` and `operator[]` are
assigned the range of the paren/bracket lists in the AST.
These are better thought of as implicit (at least `()` - `[] is murkier).
But there's no bit on Expr for implicit, so just ignore them on our side.
While here, deal with the case where an implicit stmt (e.g. implicit-this)
is wrapped in an implicit cast. Previously we ignored the statement but not
the cast, and so the cast ended up being selected.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/195
Reviewers: kadircet, lh123
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70194
Summary:
Previously they would be marked as partially-selected based on the early claim,
and never updated as no more tokens were claimed.
This affects simple VarDecls like "int x".
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66872
llvm-svn: 373442
Summary:
I split out the "extract parent instead of this" logic from the "this isn't
worth extracting" logic (now in eligibleForExtraction()), because I found it
hard to reason about.
While here, handle overloaded as well as builtin assignment operators.
Also this uncovered a bug in getCallExpr() which I fixed.
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65337
llvm-svn: 368500
Summary:
Whitespace and comments are a clear bugfix: selecting some
comments/space near a statement doesn't mean you're selecting the
surrounding block.
Semicolons are less obvious, but for similar reasons: these tokens
aren't actually claimed by any AST node (usually), so an AST-based model
like SelectionTree shouldn't take them into account.
Callers may still sometimes care about semis of course:
- when the selection is an expr with a non-expr parent, selection of
the semicolon indicates intent to select the statement.
- when a statement with a trailing semi is selected, we need to know
its range to ensure it can be removed.
SelectionTree may or may not play a role here, but these are separate questions
from its core function of describing which AST nodes were selected.
The mechanism here is the TokenBuffer from syntax-trees. We use it in a
fairly low-level way (just to get boundaries of raw spelled tokens). The
actual mapping of AST nodes to coordinates continues to use the (fairly
mature) SourceLocation based logic. TokenBuffer/Syntax trees
don't currently offer an alternative to getFileRange(), I think.
Reviewers: SureYeaah, kadircet
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65486
llvm-svn: 367453
Sprinkled some #ifndef NDEBUG in Selection.cpp to make
it possible to build with NDEBUG defined.
The problem was introduced in rL366698 when using dlog
for some debug printouts. The dlog macro expands to
DEBUG_WITH_TYPE, which isn't using it's arguments in
optimized builds (when NDEBUG is defined).
llvm-svn: 367178
Summary:
These aren't formally subexpressions in C++, in this case + is left-associative.
However informally +, *, etc are usually (mathematically) associative and users
consider these subexpressions.
We detect these and in simple cases support extracting the partial expression.
As well as builtin associative operators, we assume that overloads of them
are associative and support those too.
Reviewers: SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65139
llvm-svn: 367121
Summary:
Previously TranslationUnitDecl would never be selected.
This means root() is never null, and returns a reference.
commonAncestor() is in principle never null also, but returning TUDecl
here requires tweaks to be careful not to traverse it (this was already
possible when selecting multiple top-level decls, and there are associated bugs!)
Instead, never allow commonAncestor() to return TUDecl, return null instead.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65101
llvm-svn: 366893
Summary:
QualifiedTypeLoc isn't treated like a regular citizen by RecursiveASTVisitor.
This meant we weren't intercepting the traversal of its inner TypeLoc.
Most of the changes here are about exposing kind() so we can improve the
precision of our tests.
This should fix the issue raised in D65067.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65100
llvm-svn: 366882
Summary:
SelectionTree is a RecursiveASTVisitor which processes getSourceRange() for
every node. This is a lot of surface area with the AST, as getSourceRange()
is specialized for *many* node types.
And the resulting SelectionTree depends on the source ranges of many
visited nodes, and the order of traversal.
Put together, this means we really need a traversal log to debug when we
get an unexpected SelectionTree. I've built this ad-hoc a few times, now
it's time to check it in.
Example output:
```
D[14:07:44.184] Computing selection for </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:7, col:8>
D[14:07:44.184] push: VarDecl const auto x = 42
D[14:07:44.184] claimRange: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:12, col:13>
D[14:07:44.184] push: NestedNameSpecifierLoc (empty NestedNameSpecifierLoc)
D[14:07:44.184] pop: NestedNameSpecifierLoc (empty NestedNameSpecifierLoc)
D[14:07:44.184] push: QualifiedTypeLoc const auto
D[14:07:44.184] pop: QualifiedTypeLoc const auto
D[14:07:44.184] claimRange: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:7, col:11>
D[14:07:44.184] hit selection: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:7, col:8>
D[14:07:44.184] skip: IntegerLiteral 42
D[14:07:44.184] skipped range = </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:16>
D[14:07:44.184] pop: VarDecl const auto x = 42
D[14:07:44.184] claimRange: </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:1:1, col:18>
D[14:07:44.184] skip: VarDecl int y = 43
D[14:07:44.184] skipped range = </usr/local/google/home/sammccall/test.cc:2:1, col:9>
D[14:07:44.184] Built selection tree
TranslationUnitDecl
VarDecl const auto x = 42
.QualifiedTypeLoc const auto
```
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65073
llvm-svn: 366698
Add a tweak for clangd to replace an auto keyword to the deduced type.
This way a user can declare something with auto and then have the
IDE/clangd replace auto with whatever type clangd thinks it is. In case
of long/complext types this makes is reduces writing effort for the
user.
The functionality is similar to the hover over the auto keyword.
Example (from the header):
```
/// Before:
/// auto x = Something();
/// ^^^^
/// After:
/// MyClass x = Something();
/// ^^^^^^^
```
Patch by kuhnel! (Christian Kühnel)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62855
llvm-svn: 365792
Summary:
GetTypePtr requires that the type should not be null, otherwise we hit
an assertion, we should use getTypePtrOrNull instead.
Reviewers: sammccall, SureYeaah
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64556
llvm-svn: 365763
Summary:
- nodes can have special-cased hit ranges including "holes" (FunctionTypeLoc in void foo())
- token conflicts between siblings (int a,b;) are resolved in favor of left sibling
- parent/child overlap is handled statefully rather than explicitly by comparing parent/child
ranges (this lets us share a mechanism with sibling conflicts)
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63760
llvm-svn: 364519
Summary:
This introduces a few new concepts:
- tweaks have an Intent (they don't all advertise as refactorings)
- tweaks may produce messages (for ShowMessage notification). Generalized
Replacements -> Effect.
- tweaks (and other features) may be hidden (clangd -hidden-features flag).
We may choose to promote these one day. I'm not sure they're worth their own
feature flags though.
Verified it in vim-clangd (not yet open source), curious if the UI is ok in VSCode.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62538
llvm-svn: 363680
Summary:
The assertion checking that a range of a node is a token range does
not hold in case of "split" tokens, e.g. between two closing template
argument lists (`vector<vector<int>>`).
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58447
llvm-svn: 354507
Summary:
This reduces the per-check implementation burden and redundant work.
It also makes checks range-aware by default (treating the commonAncestor
as if it were a point selection should be good baseline behavior).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57570
llvm-svn: 352876
Summary:
The primary problem this solves is to expose the codeAction selection to
AST-based refactorings in a way that makes it easy and efficient for them to
bind to the right parts of the AST.
It should also allow us to make XRefs based features (textDocument/definition)
more robust, more easily implement textDocument/typeDefinition etc.
As an example, template parameter references can be identified without special
handling.
There should be slight speedup too: we can prune most of the AST traversal
in most cases.
Elephant in the room: this is similar-but-different to Tooling/Refactoring/ASTSelection.
That captures a smaller set of AST nodes, has a slightly different way of
representing selections, and generally has mare features and does more work.
The overall shape is pretty similar, and yet I can't quite get to behave as I
expect.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57562
llvm-svn: 352875
Summary:
The primary problem this solves is to expose the codeAction selection to
AST-based refactorings in a way that makes it easy and efficient for them to
bind to the right parts of the AST.
It should also allow us to make XRefs based features (textDocument/definition)
more robust, more easily implement textDocument/typeDefinition etc.
As an example, template parameter references can be identified without special
handling.
There should be slight speedup too: we can prune most of the AST traversal
in most cases.
Elephant in the room: this is similar-but-different to Tooling/Refactoring/ASTSelection.
That captures a smaller set of AST nodes, has a slightly different way of
representing selections, and generally has mare features and does more work.
The overall shape is pretty similar, and yet I can't quite get to behave as I
expect.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet
Subscribers: mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57562
llvm-svn: 352874
Sam McCall