Specifically, handle under-aligned object references (by explicitly
ignoring them, because this just isn't representable in the format;
yes, this means that GC silently ignores such references), descend
into anonymous structs and unions, stop classifying fields of
pointer-to-strong/weak type as strong/weak in ARC mode, and emit
skips to cover the entirety of block layouts in GC mode. As a
cleanup, extract this code into a helper class, avoid a number of
unnecessary copies and layout queries, generate skips implicitly
instead of explicitly tracking them, and clarify the bitmap-creation
logic.
llvm-svn: 250919
In llvm the only semantic difference between internal and private is that llvm
tries to hide private globals my mangling them with a private prefix. Since
the globals changed by this patch already had the magic don't mangle marker,
there should be no change in the generated assembly.
A followup patch should then be able to drop the \01L and \01l prefixes and let
llvm mangle as appropriate.
llvm-svn: 202419
increasingly prevailing case to the point that new features
like ARC don't even support the fragile ABI anymore.
This required a little bit of reshuffling with exceptions
because a check was assuming that ObjCNonFragileABI was
only being set in ObjC mode, and that's actually a bit
obnoxious to do.
Most, though, it involved a perl script to translate a ton
of test cases.
Mostly no functionality change for driver users, although
there are corner cases with disabling language-specific
exceptions that we should handle more correctly now.
llvm-svn: 140957
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
via CollectObjCIvars.
- In places where we need them, we should have the implementation and
access the properties through it.
This is a fairly substantial functionality change:
1. @encode no longer encodes synthesized ivars, ever.
2. The ivar layout bitmap no longer encodes information for
synthesized ivars in superclasses. Well, actually I had already
broken that, but it is intentional now.
We are now differing substantially from llvm-gcc and gcc
here. However, in my opinion this fundamentally *must* work if
non-fragile classes are to work. Without this change, the result of
@encode and the ivar layout depend on the order that the
implementation is seen in a file (if it is in the same file with its
superclass). Since both scenarios should work the same, our behavior
is now consistent with gcc behavior as if an implementation is never
seen following an implementation of its superclass.
Note that #2 is only a functionality change when (A) an
implementation appears in the same translation unit with the
implementation of its superclass, and (B) the superclass has
synthesized ivars. My belief is that this situation does not occur in
practice.
I am not yet sure of the role/semantics of @encode when synthesized
ivars are present... it's use is fairly unsound in a non-fragile world.
llvm-svn: 70822
Rework the shadow struct that is layed out for Objective-C classes.
- Superclasses are now always laid out in their shadow structure at
the first field.
- Prior to this, the entire class heirarchy was flattened into a
single structure which meant that alignment, padding, and bitfields
were incorrect (the ASTRecordLayout was correct however, which
meant our debug info didn't coincide with ivar offsets, for
example).
- This is still very suboptimal (for example, ivar are looked up
recursively, but I believe the ivar layout itself is now at least
close to correct.
- <rdar://problem/6773388> error: objc[29823]: layout bitmap sliding
backwards
llvm-svn: 69811
- Superclasses are now always laid out their shadow structure at the
first field.
- Prior to this, the entire class heirarchy was flattened into a
single structure which meant that alignment, padding, and bitfields
weren't packed correctly (the ASTRecordLayout was correct however,
which meant our debug info didn't coincide with ivar offsets, for
example).
- This is still very suboptimal, but I believe the ivar layout itself
is now at least close to correct.
- <rdar://problem/6773388> error: objc[29823]: layout bitmap sliding
backwards
llvm-svn: 69771
John McCall