their spelling location. This prevents warnings from being swallowed just
because the caret is on the first parenthesis in, say, NULL.
This is an experiment; the risk is that there might be a substantial number
of system headers which #define symbols to expressions which inherently cause
warnings. My theory is that that's rare enough that it can be worked
around case-by-case, and that producing useful warnings around NULL is worth
it. But I'm willing to accept that I might be empirically wrong.
llvm-svn: 95870
Enhance the printf format string checking when using the format
specifier flags ' ', '0', '+' with the 'p' or 's' conversions (since
they are nonsensical and undefined). This is similar to GCC's
checking.
Also warning when a precision is used with the 'p' conversin
specifier, since it has no meaning.
llvm-svn: 95869
Right now, it's off by default but can be tested by passing -fdump-vtable-layouts to clang -cc1. This option will cause all vtables that will normally be emitted as part of codegen to also be dumped using the new layout code.
I've also added a very simple new vtable layout test case.
llvm-svn: 95865
array associated with NonNullAttr. This fixes yet another leak when
ASTContext uses a BumpPtrAllocator.
Fixes: <rdar://problem/7637150>
llvm-svn: 95863
storing the set of StoredDeclsMaps in an internal vector of void*.
This isn't an ideal solution, but for the time being this fixes a
major memory leak with these DenseMaps not being freed.
Fixes: <rdar://problem/7634755>
llvm-svn: 95861
array allocated using the allocator in ASTContext. This addresses
these strings getting leaked when using a BumpPtrAllocator (in
ASTContext).
Fixes: <rdar://problem/7636765>
llvm-svn: 95853
we would just leak them all over the place, with no clear ownership of
these objects at all. AttributeList objects would get leaked on both
error and non-error paths.
Note: I introduced the usage of llvm::OwningPtr<AttributeList> to
manage these objects, which is particularly useful for methods with
multiple return sites. In at least one method I used them even when
they weren't strictly necessary because it clarified the ownership
semantics and made the code easier to read. Should the excessive
'take()' and 'reset()' calls become a performance issue we can always
re-evaluate.
Note+1: I believe I have not introduced any double-frees, but it would
be nice for someone to review this.
This fixes <rdar://problem/7635046>.
llvm-svn: 95847
attribute, so it uses Anton's new target-specific attribute support. It's
supposed to ensure that the stack is 16-byte aligned, but since necessary
support is lacking from LLVM, this is a no-op for now.
llvm-svn: 95820
merged with variables of constant array types. Also, make sure that we
call DiagnosticClient's BeginSourceFile/EndSourceFile, so that it has
a LangOptions to work with.
llvm-svn: 95782
conversions. Fix an access-control bug where privileges were not considered
at intermediate points along the inheritance path. Prepare for friends.
llvm-svn: 95775
into another AST, including their include history. Here's an example
error that involves a conflict merging a variable with different types
in two translation units (diagnosed in the third AST context into
which everything is merged).
/Volumes/Data/dgregor/Projects/llvm/tools/clang/test/ASTMerge/Inputs/var2.c:3:5:
error: external variable 'x2' declared with incompatible types in
different translation units ('int' vs. 'double')
int x2;
^
In file included from
/Volumes/Data/dgregor/Projects/llvm/tools/clang/test/ASTMerge/Inputs/var1.c:3:
/Volumes/Data/dgregor/Projects/llvm/tools/clang/test/ASTMerge/Inputs/var1.h:1:8:
note: declared here with type 'double'
double x2;
^
Although we maintain include history, we do not maintain macro
instantiation history across a merge. Instead, we map down to the
spelling location (for now!).
llvm-svn: 95732
that we get readable diagnostics such as:
error: external variable 'x1' declared with incompatible types in
different translation units ('double *' vs. 'float **')
However, there is no translation of source locations, yet.
llvm-svn: 95704
This is a non-fragile-abi feature only. Since it
breaks existing code, it is currently placed under
-fobjc-nonfragile-abi2 option for test purposes only
until further notice. WIP.
llvm-svn: 95685
NULL, not the store, to determine if a lookup succeeded. The store
can be null if it contained no bindings. This fixes a false positive
reported to me by a user of the analyzer.
llvm-svn: 95679
Sema::ActOnUninitializedDecl over to InitializationSequence (with
default initialization), eliminating redundancy. More importantly, we
now check that a const definition in C++ has an initilizer, which was
an #if 0'd code for many, many months. A few other tweaks were needed
to get everything working again:
- Fix all of the places in the testsuite where we defined const
objects without initializers (now that we diagnose this issue)
- Teach instantiation of static data members to find the previous
declaration, so that we build proper redeclaration
chains. Previously, we had the redeclaration chain but built it
too late to be useful, because...
- Teach instantiation of static data member definitions not to try
to check an initializer if a previous declaration already had an
initializer. This makes sure that we don't complain about static
const data members with in-class initializers and out-of-line
definitions.
- Move all of the incomplete-type checking logic out of
Sema::FinalizeDeclaratorGroup; it makes more sense in
ActOnUnitializedDecl.
There may still be a few places where we can improve these
diagnostics. I'll address that as a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 95657
- This fixes many many more places than the test case, but my feeling is we need to audit alignment systematically so I'm not inclined to try hard to test the individual fixes in this patch. If this bothers you, patches welcome!
PR6240.
llvm-svn: 95648
John McCall