maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
365,524 Commits 23 Branches 0 Tags 2.2 GiB
Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song dbc96b518b Revert "[CodeGenModule] Assume dso_local for -fpic -fno-semantic-interposition" 
This reverts commit 789a46f2d7.

Accidentally committed.
 2020-02-03 10:09:39 -08:00
Fangrui Song 789a46f2d7 [CodeGenModule] Assume dso_local for -fpic -fno-semantic-interposition 
Summary:
Clang -fpic defaults to -fno-semantic-interposition (GCC -fpic defaults
to -fsemantic-interposition).
Users need to specify -fsemantic-interposition to get semantic
interposition behavior.

Semantic interposition is currently a best-effort feature. There may
still be some cases where it is not handled well.

Reviewers: peter.smith, rnk, serge-sans-paille, sfertile, jfb, jdoerfert

Subscribers: dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, nemanjai, jvesely, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, arphaman, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73865
 2020-02-03 09:52:48 -08:00
Eric Fiselier 8e92050794 [SemaCXX] Unconfuse Clang when std::align_val_t is unscoped in C++03 
When -faligned-allocation is specified in C++03 libc++ defines
std::align_val_t as an unscoped enumeration type (because Clang didn't
provide scoped enumerations as an extension until 8.0).
Unfortunately Clang confuses the `align_val_t` overloads of delete with
the sized deallocation overloads which aren't enabled. This caused Clang
to call the aligned deallocation function as if it were the sized
deallocation overload.

For example: https://godbolt.org/z/xXJELh

This patch fixes the confusion.

llvm-svn: 351294
 2019-01-16 02:34:36 +00:00
Eric Fiselier 3b4bbe7b0f Revert "[SemaCXX] Unconfuse Clang when std::align_val_t is unscoped in C++03" 
This reverts commit b5d8d0de744d2c212bdb17d5c5fd4447dd14dbd2.

llvm-svn: 345306
 2018-10-25 19:50:43 +00:00
Eric Fiselier 84eaf0c9e4 [SemaCXX] Unconfuse Clang when std::align_val_t is unscoped in C++03 
Summary:
When -faligned-allocation is specified in C++03 libc++ defines std::align_val_t as an unscoped enumeration type (because Clang didn't provide scoped enumerations as an extension until 8.0).
Unfortunately Clang confuses the `align_val_t` overloads of delete with the sized deallocation overloads which aren't enabled. This caused Clang to call the aligned deallocation function as if it were the sized deallocation overload.

For example: https://godbolt.org/z/xXJELh

This patch fixes the confusion.

Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF

Reviewed By: EricWF

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53508

llvm-svn: 345296
 2018-10-25 18:16:16 +00:00
Eric Fiselier 1265ddef99 Revert "[SemaCXX] Unconfuse Clang when std::align_val_t is unscoped in C++03" 
This reverts commit 6f47cdd51341344c0e32630e19e72c94cd25f34e.

llvm-svn: 345225
 2018-10-24 23:47:04 +00:00
Eric Fiselier 5e707cb274 [SemaCXX] Unconfuse Clang when std::align_val_t is unscoped in C++03 
Summary:
When -faligned-allocation is specified in C++03 libc++ defines std::align_val_t as an unscoped enumeration type (because Clang didn't provide scoped enumerations as an extension until 8.0).
Unfortunately Clang confuses the `align_val_t` overloads of delete with the sized deallocation overloads which aren't enabled. This caused Clang to call the aligned deallocation function as if it were the sized deallocation overload.

For example: https://godbolt.org/z/xXJELh

This patch fixes the confusion.

Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF

Reviewed By: EricWF

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53508

llvm-svn: 345211
 2018-10-24 22:38:49 +00:00