The old locking attributes had a generic release, but as it turns out
the capability-based attributes have it as well.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87064
Instead of just mutex members we also consider mutex globals.
Unsurprisingly they are always in scope. Now the paper [1] says that
> The scope of a class member is assumed to be its enclosing class,
> while the scope of a global variable is the translation unit in
> which it is defined.
But I don't think we should limit this to TUs where a definition is
available - a declaration is enough to acquire the mutex, and if a mutex
is really limited in scope to a translation unit, it should probably be
only declared there.
[1] https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/us/pubs/archive/42958.pdf
Fixes PR46354.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84604
The __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS feature macro is specified in the Arm C
Language Extensions (ACLE) for SVE [1] (version 00bet5). From the spec,
where __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS==N:
When N is nonzero, indicates that the implementation is generating
code for an N-bit SVE target and that the arm_sve_vector_bits(N)
attribute is available.
This was defined in D83550 as __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS_EXPERIMENTAL and
enabled under the -msve-vector-bits flag to simplify initial tests.
This patch drops _EXPERIMENTAL now there is support for the feature.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86720
On x86, long double has 6 unused trailing bytes. This patch changes the
constant evaluator to treat them as though they were padding bytes, so reading
from them results in an indeterminate value, and nothing is written for them.
Also, fix a similar bug with bool, but instead of treating the unused bits as
padding, enforce that they're zero.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76323
Other warning messages for negative capabilities also mention their
kind, and the double space was ugly.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84603
This patch implements the semantics for the 'arm_sve_vector_bits' type
attribute, defined by the Arm C Language Extensions (ACLE) for SVE [1].
The purpose of this attribute is to define vector-length-specific (VLS)
versions of existing vector-length-agnostic (VLA) types.
The semantics were already implemented by D83551, although the
implementation approach has since changed to represent VLSTs as
VectorType in the AST and fixed-length vectors in the IR everywhere
except in function args/returns. This is described in the prototype
patch D85128 demonstrating the new approach.
The semantic changes added in D83551 are changed since the
AttributedType is replaced by VectorType in the AST. Minimal changes
were necessary in the previous patch as the canonical type for both VLA
and VLS was the same (i.e. sizeless), except in constructs such as
globals and structs where sizeless types are unsupported. This patch
reverts the changes that permitted VLS types that were represented as
sizeless types in such circumstances, and adds support for implicit
casting between VLA <-> VLS types as described in section 3.7.3.2 of the
ACLE.
Since the SVE builtin types for bool and uint8 are both represented as
BuiltinType::UChar in VLSTs, two new vector kinds are implemented to
distinguish predicate and data vectors.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85736
for array bounds, not "integer constant" rules.
For an array bound of class type, this causes us to perform an implicit
conversion to size_t, instead of looking for a unique conversion to
integral or unscoped enumeration type. This affects which cases are
valid when a class has multiple implicit conversion functions to
different types.
We're (temporarily) disabling ExtInt for the '__atomic' builtins so we can better design their behavior later. The idea is until we do an audit/design for the way atomic builtins are supposed to work with _ExtInt, we should leave them restricted so they don't limit our future options, such as by binding us to a sub-optimal implementation via ABI.
Example after this change:
$ cat test.c
void f(_ExtInt(64) *ptr) {
__atomic_fetch_add(ptr, 1, 0);
}
$ clang -c test.c
test.c:2:22: error: argument to atomic builtin of type '_ExtInt' is not supported
__atomic_fetch_add(ptr, 1, 0);
^
1 error generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84049
When a conditional expression has a throw expression it called
GetExprRange with a void expression, which caused an assertion failure.
This approach was suggested by Richard Smith.
Fixes PR46484: Clang crash in clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:10028
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85601
If a functionDecl is invalid (e.g. return type cannot be formed), int is
use as he fallback type, which may lead to some bogus diagnostics.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85714
`OS << ND->getDeclName();` is equivalent to `OS << ND->getNameAsString();`
without the extra temporary string.
This is not quite a NFC since two uses of `getNameAsString` in a
diagnostic are replaced, which results in the named entity being
quoted with additional "'"s (ie: 'var' instead of var).
No other compiler accepts this as an extension, not even in permissive
mode. We're not doing anyone any favors by allowing this, and it's
unlikely to be at all common, even in Clang-only code, in the wild.
Only permit a placeholder type in a trailing-return-type if it would
also have been permitted in the decl-specifier sequence of a
corresponding declaration with no trailing-return-type. The standard
doesn't actually say this, but this is the only thing that makes sense.
Also fix handling of an 'auto' in a trailing-return-type in a parameter
of a generic lambda. We used to crash if we saw such a thing.
Background:
-----------
There are two related argument types which can be sent into a diagnostic to
display the name of an entity: DeclarationName (ak_declarationname) or
NamedDecl* (ak_nameddecl) (there is also ak_identifierinfo for
IdentifierInfo*, but we are not concerned with it here).
A DeclarationName in a diagnostic will just be streamed to the output,
which will directly result in a call to DeclarationName::print.
A NamedDecl* in a diagnostic will also ultimately result in a call to
DeclarationName::print, but with two customisation points along the way:
The first customisation point is NamedDecl::getNameForDiagnostic which is
overloaded by FunctionDecl, ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl and
VarTemplateSpecializationDecl to print the template arguments, if any.
The second customisation point is NamedDecl::printName. By default it just
streams the stored DeclarationName into the output but it can be customised
to provide a user-friendly name for an entity. It is currently overloaded by
DecompositionDecl and MSGuidDecl.
What this patch does:
---------------------
For many diagnostics a DeclarationName is used instead of the NamedDecl*.
This bypasses the two customisation points mentioned above. This patches fix
this for diagnostics in Sema.cpp, SemaCast.cpp, SemaChecking.cpp, SemaDecl.cpp,
SemaDeclAttr.cpp, SemaDecl.cpp, SemaOverload.cpp and SemaStmt.cpp.
I have only modified diagnostics where I could construct a test-case which
demonstrates that the change is appropriate (either with this patch or the next
one).
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84656
As reported in PR46774, an invalid arithemetic conversion used in a C
ternary operator resulted in an assertion. This patch replaces that
assertion with a diagnostic stating that the conversion failed.
At the moment, I believe the only case of this happening is _ExtInt
types.
This warning was modified in 796ed03b84 to use the term "consteval"
for consteval functions. However the warning has never worked as
intended since the diagnostic's arguments are used in the wrong order.
This was unfortunately missed by 796ed03b84 since no test did exercise
this specific warning.
Additionally send the NamedDecl* into the diagnostic instead of just the
IdentifierInfo* to correctly work with special names and template
arguments.
We don't allow runtime-sized flexible array members, nor initialization
of flexible array members, but it seems reasonable to support the most
basic case where the flexible array member is empty.
- add more tests (the test added in 2f448467e4 is weak);
- improve the `MyTemplate<type_typo, int>();` case, with this patch, typo correction
suggests the type decl, and no regressions found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83025
This patch adds `-Wsuggest-override`, which allows for more aggressive enforcement of modern C++ best practices, as well as better compatibility with gcc, which has had its own `-Wsuggest-override` since version 5.1.
Clang already has `-Winconsistent-missing-override`, which only warns in the case where there is at least one function already marked `override` in a class. This warning strengthens that warning by suggesting the `override` keyword regardless of whether it is already present anywhere.
The text between suggest-override and inconsistent-missing-override is now shared, using `TextSubstitution` for the entire diagnostic text.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82728
variable's initializer is not known.
The hope is that a better diagnostic for this case will reduce the rate
at which duplicates of non-bug PR41093 are reported.
be dependent if it names the right type.
This matches the GCC behavior, but no longer matches the standard
wording. However, the standard wording in this case is not in line with
the intent, which was to require the enclosing class type to be named
directly. I've reported this wording oversight to the committee.
RecoveryExpr was always lvalue, but it is wrong if we use it to model
broken function calls, function call expression has more compliated rules:
- a call to a function whose return type is an lvalue reference yields an lvalue;
- a call to a function whose return type is an rvalue reference yields an xvalue;
- a call to a function whose return type is nonreference type yields a prvalue;
This patch makes the recovery-expr align with the function call if it is
modeled a broken call.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83201
sequence on a glvalue expression.
If the sequence is supposed to perform an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion,
then one will be specified as the first conversion in the sequence.
Otherwise, one should not be invented.
Summary:
Some libraries use empty function to ignore unused variable warnings, which gets a new warning from `-Wuninitialized-const-reference`, discussed here https://reviews.llvm.org/D79895#2107604.
This patch should fix that.
Reviewers: hans, nick, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82425
User can own a version of coroutine_handle::address() whose return type is not
void* by using template specialization for coroutine_handle<> for some
promise_type.
In this case, the codes may violate the capability with existing async C APIs
that accepted a void* data parameter which was then passed back to the
user-provided callback.
Patch by ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82442
Zequan Wu