The __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS feature macro is specified in the Arm C
Language Extensions (ACLE) for SVE [1] (version 00bet5). From the spec,
where __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS==N:
When N is nonzero, indicates that the implementation is generating
code for an N-bit SVE target and that the arm_sve_vector_bits(N)
attribute is available.
This was defined in D83550 as __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS_EXPERIMENTAL and
enabled under the -msve-vector-bits flag to simplify initial tests.
This patch drops _EXPERIMENTAL now there is support for the feature.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86720
Continue to heuristically pick the wider of the two operands for
narrowing conversion warnings so that some_char + 1 isn't treated as
being wider than a char, but use the more accurate computation for
tautological comparison warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85778
This patch implements the semantics for the 'arm_sve_vector_bits' type
attribute, defined by the Arm C Language Extensions (ACLE) for SVE [1].
The purpose of this attribute is to define vector-length-specific (VLS)
versions of existing vector-length-agnostic (VLA) types.
The semantics were already implemented by D83551, although the
implementation approach has since changed to represent VLSTs as
VectorType in the AST and fixed-length vectors in the IR everywhere
except in function args/returns. This is described in the prototype
patch D85128 demonstrating the new approach.
The semantic changes added in D83551 are changed since the
AttributedType is replaced by VectorType in the AST. Minimal changes
were necessary in the previous patch as the canonical type for both VLA
and VLS was the same (i.e. sizeless), except in constructs such as
globals and structs where sizeless types are unsupported. This patch
reverts the changes that permitted VLS types that were represented as
sizeless types in such circumstances, and adds support for implicit
casting between VLA <-> VLS types as described in section 3.7.3.2 of the
ACLE.
Since the SVE builtin types for bool and uint8 are both represented as
BuiltinType::UChar in VLSTs, two new vector kinds are implemented to
distinguish predicate and data vectors.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85736
This enables us to use the __builtin_rotateleft / __builtin_rotateright 8/16/32/64 intrinsics inside constexpr code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86342
This adds parsing and codegen support for tune in target attribute.
I've implemented this so that arch in the target attribute implicitly disables tune from the command line. I'm not sure what gcc does here. But since -march implies -mtune. I assume 'arch' in the target attribute implies tune in the target attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86187
[Clang] Fix BZ47169, loader_uninitialized on incomplete types
Reported by @erichkeane. Fix proposed by @erichkeane works, tests included.
Bug introduced in D74361. Crash was on querying a CXXRecordDecl for
hasTrivialDefaultConstructor on an incomplete type. Fixed by calling
RequireCompleteType in the right place.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85990
We're (temporarily) disabling ExtInt for the '__atomic' builtins so we can better design their behavior later. The idea is until we do an audit/design for the way atomic builtins are supposed to work with _ExtInt, we should leave them restricted so they don't limit our future options, such as by binding us to a sub-optimal implementation via ABI.
Example after this change:
$ cat test.c
void f(_ExtInt(64) *ptr) {
__atomic_fetch_add(ptr, 1, 0);
}
$ clang -c test.c
test.c:2:22: error: argument to atomic builtin of type '_ExtInt' is not supported
__atomic_fetch_add(ptr, 1, 0);
^
1 error generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84049
ns_error_domain can be used by, e.g. NS_ERROR_ENUM, in order to
identify a global declaration representing the domain constant.
Introduces the attribute, Sema handling, diagnostics, and test case.
This is cherry-picked from a14779f504
and adapted to updated Clang APIs.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84005
- Prevent nullptr-deference at try to emit warning for invalid `expr`
- Simplify `InitListChecker::UpdateStructuredListElement()` usages. We do not need to check `expr` and increment `StructuredIndex` (for invalid `expr`) before the call anymore.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85193
This change squelches the warning for a cast from fixed to fixed point
conversions when -Wbad-function-cast is enabled.
Fixes:
cast from function call of type '_Fract' to non-matching type '_Fract'
[-Wbad-function-cast]
Reviewed By: bjope
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85157
Vectors of bfloat are a storage format only; you're supposed to
explicitly convert them to a wider type to do arithmetic on them.
But currently, if you write something like
bfloat16x4_t test(bfloat16x4_t a, bfloat16x4_t b) { return a + b; }
then the clang frontend accepts it without error, and (ARM or AArch64)
isel fails to generate code for it.
Added a rule in Sema that forbids the attempt from even being made,
and tests that check it. In particular, we also outlaw arithmetic
between vectors of bfloat and any other vector type.
Patch by Luke Cheeseman.
Reviewed By: LukeGeeson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85009
This warning diagnoses cases where an expression is compared to a
constant, and the comparison is tautological due to the form of the
expression (but not merely due to its type). This applies in cases such
as comparisons of bit-fields and the result of bit-masks.
The new warning is added to the Clang diagnostic group
-Wtautological-constant-in-range-compare but not to the
formerly-equivalent GCC-compatibility diagnostic group -Wtype-limits,
which retains its old meaning of diagnosing only tautological
comparisons to extremal values of a type (eg, int > INT_MAX).
Reviewed By: rtrieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85256
This patch added the following additional compile-once
run-everywhere (CO-RE) relocations:
- existence/size of typedef, struct/union or enum type
- enum value and enum value existence
These additional relocations will make CO-RE bpf programs more
adaptive for potential kernel internal data structure changes.
For existence/size relocations, the following two code patterns
are supported:
1. uint32_t __builtin_preserve_type_info(*(<type> *)0, flag);
2. <type> var;
uint32_t __builtin_preserve_field_info(var, flag);
flag = 0 for existence relocation and flag = 1 for size relocation.
For enum value existence and enum value relocations, the following code
pattern is supported:
uint64_t __builtin_preserve_enum_value(*(<enum_type> *)<enum_value>,
flag);
flag = 0 means existence relocation and flag = 1 for enum value.
relocation. In the above <enum_type> can be an enum type or
a typedef to enum type. The <enum_value> needs to be an enumerator
value from the same enum type. The return type is uint64_t to
permit potential 64bit enumerator values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83242
Since we permit using SOME attributes (at the moment, just 1) with
multiversioning, we should improve the message as it still implies that
no attributes should be combined with multiversioning.
Summary:
This patch implements semantics for the 'arm_sve_vector_bits' type
attribute, defined by the Arm C Language Extensions (ACLE) for SVE [1].
The purpose of this attribute is to define fixed-length (VLST) versions
of existing sizeless types (VLAT).
Implemented in this patch is the the behaviour described in section 3.7.3.2
and minimal parts of sections 3.7.3.3 and 3.7.3.4, this includes:
* Defining VLST globals, structs, unions, and local variables
* Implicit casting between VLAT <=> VLST.
* Diagnosis of ill-formed conditional expressions of the form:
C ? E1 : E2
where E1 is a VLAT type and E2 is a VLST, or vice-versa. This
avoids any ambiguity about the nature of the result type (i.e is
it sized or sizeless).
* For vectors:
* sizeof(VLST) == N/8
* alignof(VLST) == 16
* For predicates:
* sizeof(VLST) == N/64
* alignof(VLST) == 2
VLSTs have the same representation as VLATs in the AST but are wrapped
with a TypeAttribute. Scalable types are currently emitted in the IR for
uses such as globals and structs which don't support these types, this
is addressed in the next patch with codegen, where VLSTs are lowered to
sized arrays for globals, structs / unions and arrays.
Not implemented in this patch is the behaviour guarded by the feature
macros:
* __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_VECTOR_OPERATORS
* __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_PREDICATE_OPERATORS
As such, the GNU __attribute__((vector_size)) extension is not available
and operators such as binary '+' are not supported for VLSTs. Support
for this is intended to be addressed by later patches.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest
This is patch 2/4 of a patch series.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, rsandifo-arm, efriedma, cameron.mcinally, ctetreau, rengolin, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83551
Summary:
We need to detect when certain TypoExprs are not being transformed
due to invalid trees, otherwise we risk endlessly trying to fix it.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84067
As reported in PR46774, an invalid arithemetic conversion used in a C
ternary operator resulted in an assertion. This patch replaces that
assertion with a diagnostic stating that the conversion failed.
At the moment, I believe the only case of this happening is _ExtInt
types.
Summary:
This patch implements parsing support for the 'arm_sve_vector_bits' type
attribute, defined by the Arm C Language Extensions (ACLE, version 00bet5,
section 3.7.3) for SVE [1].
The purpose of this attribute is to define fixed-length (VLST) versions
of existing sizeless types (VLAT). For example:
#if __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS==512
typedef svint32_t fixed_svint32_t __attribute__((arm_sve_vector_bits(512)));
#endif
Creates a type 'fixed_svint32_t' that is a fixed-length version of
'svint32_t' that is normal-sized (rather than sizeless) and contains
exactly 512 bits. Unlike 'svint32_t', this type can be used in places
such as structs and arrays where sizeless types can't.
Implemented in this patch is the following:
* Defined and tested attribute taking single argument.
* Checks the argument is an integer constant expression.
* Attribute can only be attached to a single SVE vector or predicate
type, excluding tuple types such as svint32x4_t.
* Added the `-msve-vector-bits=<bits>` flag. When specified the
`__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS__EXPERIMENTAL` macro is defined.
* Added a language option to store the vector size specified by the
`-msve-vector-bits=<bits>` flag. This is used to validate `N ==
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS`, where N is the number of bits passed to the
attribute and `__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS` is the feature macro defined under
the same flag.
The `__ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS` macro will be made non-experimental in the final
patch of the series.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100987/latest
This is patch 1/4 of a patch series.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, rsandifo-arm, efriedma, ctetreau, cameron.mcinally, rengolin, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83550
The _ExtInt type allows custom width integers, but the atomic memory
access's operand must have a power-of-two size. _ExtInts with
non-power-of-two size should not be allowed for atomic intrinsic.
Before this change:
$ cat test.c
typedef unsigned _ExtInt(42) dtype;
void verify_binary_op_nand(dtype* pval1, dtype val2)
{ __sync_nand_and_fetch(pval1, val2); }
$ clang test.c
clang-11:
/home/ubuntu/llvm_workspace/llvm/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGBuiltin.cpp:117:
llvm::Value*
EmitToInt(clang::CodeGen::CodeGenFunction&, llvm::Value*,
clang::QualType, llvm::IntegerType*): Assertion `V->getType() ==
IntType' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the
crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
After this change:
$ clang test.c
test.c:3:30: error: Atomic memory operand must have a power-of-two size
{ __sync_nand_and_fetch(pval1, val2); }
^
List of the atomic intrinsics that have this
problem:
__sync_fetch_and_add
__sync_fetch_and_sub
__sync_fetch_and_or
__sync_fetch_and_and
__sync_fetch_and_xor
__sync_fetch_and_nand
__sync_nand_and_fetch
__sync_and_and_fetch
__sync_add_and_fetch
__sync_sub_and_fetch
__sync_or_and_fetch
__sync_xor_and_fetch
__sync_fetch_and_min
__sync_fetch_and_max
__sync_fetch_and_umin
__sync_fetch_and_umax
__sync_val_compare_and_swap
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83340
Currently, Clang previously diagnosed this code by default:
void f(int a[static 0]);
saying that "static has no effect on zero-length arrays", which was
accurate.
However, static array extents require that the caller of the function
pass a nonnull pointer to an array of *at least* that number of
elements, but it can pass more (see C17 6.7.6.3p6). Given that we allow
zero-sized arrays as a GNU extension and that it's valid to pass more
elements than specified by the static array extent, we now support
zero-sized static array extents with the usual semantics because it can
be useful in cases like:
void my_bzero(char p[static 0], int n);
my_bzero(&c+1, 0); //ok
my_bzero(t+k,n-k); //ok, pattern from actual code
in places such as constant folding
Previously some places that should have handled
__builtin_expect_with_probability is missing, so in some case it acts
differently than __builtin_expect.
For example it was not handled in constant folding, thus in the
following program, the "if" condition should be constantly true and
folded, but previously it was not handled and cause warning "control may
reach end of non-void function" (while __builtin_expect does not):
__attribute__((noreturn)) extern void bar();
int foo(int x, int y) {
if (y) {
if (__builtin_expect_with_probability(1, 1, 1))
bar();
}
else
return 0;
}
Now it's fixed.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83362
__builtin_va_*() and __builtin_ms_va_*() are declared as functions with a
parameter of reference type.
This patch fixes a crash when using these functions in C where an argument
of structure type is incompatible with the parameter type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82805
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Patch by: Aleksandr Platonov <platonov.aleksandr@huawei.com>
The error-bit was missing, and the unexpandedpack bit seemed to be
set incorrectly.
Reviewed By: sammccall, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83114
Summary:
We might lose the error-bit if the error-bit goes through the code path
"error type/expr" -> "error template argument" -> "nested name specifier" ->
... -> "template Specialization type"
Template name also needs this, as a template can be nested into
an error specifier, e.g. templateName apply in
`TC<decltype(<recovery-expr>(Foo, int()))>::template apply`
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82526
Summary:
Patch adds tests for mangling of svbfloat16_t and several other type
related tests.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, kmclaughlin, fpetrogalli, efriedma
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, fpetrogalli
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82668
This was suggested in D72782 and brings the diagnostics more in line
with how argument references are handled elsewhere.
Reviewers: rjmccall, jfb, Bigcheese
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82473
Add a new builtin-function __builtin_expect_with_probability and
intrinsic llvm.expect.with.probability.
The interface is __builtin_expect_with_probability(long expr, long
expected, double probability).
It is mainly the same as __builtin_expect besides one more argument
indicating the probability of expression equal to expected value. The
probability should be a constant floating-point expression and be in
range [0.0, 1.0] inclusive.
It is similar to builtin-expect-with-probability function in GCC
built-in functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79830
Cullen Rhodes