This reverts commit 414f84ba29.
Requires deirectives had already been added to the test, and CC1 tests
should use a target triple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124210
Supplying the target triple caused breakeages for compilers that don't support
the supplied triple.
Reviewed By: mysterymath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124203
Current stack size diagnostics ignore the size of the unsafe stack.
This patch attaches the size of the static portion of the unsafe stack
to the function as metadata, which can be used by the backend to emit
diagnostics regarding stack usage.
Reviewed By: phosek, mcgrathr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119996
WG14 has elected to remove support for K&R C functions in C2x. The
feature was introduced into C89 already deprecated, so after this long
of a deprecation period, the committee has made an empty parameter list
mean the same thing in C as it means in C++: the function accepts no
arguments exactly as if the function were written with (void) as the
parameter list.
This patch implements WG14 N2841 No function declarators without
prototypes (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2841.htm)
and WG14 N2432 Remove support for function definitions with identifier
lists (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2432.pdf).
It also adds The -fno-knr-functions command line option to opt into
this behavior in other language modes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123955
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
The previous patch introduced the offloading binary format so we can
store some metada along with the binary image. This patch introduces
using this inside the linker wrapper and Clang instead of the previous
method that embedded the metadata in the section name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122683
LTO objects might compiled with different `mbranch-protection` flags which will cause an error in the linker.
Such a setup is allowed in the normal build with this change that is possible.
Reviewed By: pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123493
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.
The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
This patch removes --version as a clang -cc1 option.
clang --version
and
clang --cc1 -version
remain valid. This behaviour is consistent with clang -cc1as.
Previously, clang -cc1 accepted both --version and -version, but
only -version was acted upon. The call
clang -cc1 --version
stalled without any message: --version was an accepted option but
triggered no action, and the driver waited for standard input.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122344
Currently we use the `-fembed-offload-object` option to embed a binary
file into the host as a named section. This is currently only used as a
codegen action, meaning we only handle this option correctly when the
input is a bitcode file. This patch adds the same handling to embed an
offloading object after we complete code generation. This allows us to
embed the object correctly if the input file is source or bitcode.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120270
Summary:
We use a section to embed offloading code into the host for later
linking. This is normally unique to the translation unit as it is thrown
away during linking. However, if the user performs a relocatable link
the sections will be merged and we won't be able to access the files
stored inside. This patch changes the section variables to have external
linkage and a name defined by the section name, so if two sections are
combined during linking we get an error.
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the sixth batch of tests being updated (there are a significant
number of other tests left to be updated).
This patch adds support for a flag `-fembed-offload-binary` to embed a
file as an ELF section in the output by placing it in a global variable.
This can be used to bundle offloading files with the host binary so it
can be accessed by the linker. The section is named using the
`-fembed-offload-section` option.
Depends on D116541
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116542
to give users a final warning that they need to migrate away. They could still
use -flegacy-pass-manager for Clang 14.0.0, but the functionality may not work
for 15.0.0.
-fexperimental-new-pass-manager is a no-op for default builds, so not urgent to
be removed for 14.0.0.
clang/test/Frontend/optimization-remark-with-hotness.c is removed because its
new PM replacement optimization-remark-with-hotness-new-pm.c exists.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118313
Branch protection in M-class is supported by
- Armv8.1-M.Main
- Armv8-M.Main
- Armv7-M
Attempting to enable this for other architectures, either by
command-line (e.g -mbranch-protection=bti) or by target attribute
in source code (e.g. __attribute__((target("branch-protection=..."))) )
will generate a warning.
In both cases function attributes related to branch protection will not
be emitted. Regardless of the warning, module level attributes related to
branch protection will be emitted when it is enabled via the command-line.
The following people also contributed to this patch:
- Victor Campos
Reviewed By: chill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115501
This feature requires support of __opencl_c_generic_address_space and
__opencl_c_program_scope_global_variables so diagnostics for that is provided as well.
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115640
The default for min is changed to 1. The behaviour of -mvscale-{min,max}
in Clang is also changed such that 16 is the max vscale when targeting
SVE and no max is specified.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113294
This test which was just introduced in the PACBTI-M frontend
patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421) is currently failing on some
platforms. Removing temporarily.
Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function
attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying
parsing mechanism.
These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for
AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649):
- command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR
attributes (metadata).
- functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function
declaration.
- command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm,
following this grammar:
branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection>
protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ]
| <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"]
pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ]
pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"]
b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's
version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is
unsupported and a-key will be selected instead.
- Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the
same grammer as the commandline options.
This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of
the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension
The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference
Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Momchil Velikov
- Victor Campos
- Ties Stuij
Reviewed By: vhscampos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
From GCC's manpage:
-fplugin-arg-name-key=value
Define an argument called key with a value of value for the
plugin called name.
Since we don't have a key-value pair similar to gcc's plugin_argument
struct, simply accept key=value here anyway and pass it along as-is to
plugins.
This translates to the already existing '-plugin-arg-pluginname arg'
that clang cc1 accepts.
There is an ambiguity here because in clang, both the plugin name
as well as the option name can contain dashes, so when e.g. passing
-fplugin-arg-foo-bar-foo
it is not clear whether the plugin is foo-bar and the option is foo,
or the plugin is foo and the option is bar-foo. GCC solves this by
interpreting all dashes as part of the option name. So dashes can't be
part of the plugin name in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113250
Currently we have a way to run a plugin if specified on the command line
after the main action, and ways to unconditionally run the plugin before
or after the main action, but no way to run a plugin if specified on the
command line before the main action.
This introduces the missing option.
This is helpful because -clear-ast-before-backend clears the AST before
codegen, while some plugins may want access to the AST.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112096
Now that the legacy PM is deprecated for the optimization pipeline, we
can start deleting legacy PM tests.
For tests that test both PMs, merge the RUN lines.
Delete tests specific to the legacy PM.
This also removes the need to disable the mandatory inlining phase in
tests.
In a departure from the previous remark, we don't output a 'cost' in
this case, because there's no such thing. We just report that inlining
happened because of the attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110891
We keep a map from function name to source location so we don't have to
do it via looking up a source location from the AST. However, since
function names can be long, we actually use a hash of the function name
as the key.
Additionally, we can't rely on Clang's printing of function names via
the AST, so we just demangle the name instead.
This is necessary to implement
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2021-September/068930.html.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110665
A followup to D110201.
For example, we'd set OptimizationRemarkMissed's Regex to '.*' when
encountering -Rpass. Normally this doesn't actually affect remarks we
emit because in clang::ProcessWarningOptions() we'll separately look at
all -R arguments and turn on/off corresponding diagnostic groups.
However, this is reproducible with -round-trip-args.
Reviewed By: JamesNagurne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110673
To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute value as the LLVM attribute value. This gives us all
the information to report diagnostics we need from within the IR (aside
from access to the original source).
One downside is we directly use LLVM's demangler rather than using the
existing Clang diagnostic pretty printing of symbols.
Previous revisions didn't properly declare the new dependencies.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110364
Some people downstream are reporting that this test fails. I've been
unable to reproduce, but there is indeed something spooky going on.
Pinning to the new PM suppresses the failure. I'm continuing to
investigate this.
To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute value as the LLVM attribute value. This gives us all
the information to report diagnostics we need from within the IR (aside
from access to the original source).
One downside is we directly use LLVM's demangler rather than using the
existing Clang diagnostic pretty printing of symbols.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110364
(This relands 59337263ab and makes sure comma operator
diagnostics are suppressed in a SFINAE context.)
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
Previously with -Rpass (and friends) we'd have remarks "enabled", but
without an actual regex.
As seen in the test change to line numbers, this can give us better
diagnostics by properly enabling NeedLocTracking with -Rpass.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110201
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.
This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
Add support for the GNU C style __attribute__((error(""))) and
__attribute__((warning(""))). These attributes are meant to be put on
declarations of functions whom should not be called.
They are frequently used to provide compile time diagnostics similar to
_Static_assert, but which may rely on non-ICE conditions (ie. relying on
compiler optimizations). This is also similar to diagnose_if function
attribute, but can diagnose after optimizations have been run.
While users may instead simply call undefined functions in such cases to
get a linkage failure from the linker, these provide a much more
ergonomic and actionable diagnostic to users and do so at compile time
rather than at link time. Users instead may be able use inline asm .err
directives.
These are used throughout the Linux kernel in its implementation of
BUILD_BUG and BUILD_BUG_ON macros. These macros generally cannot be
converted to use _Static_assert because many of the parameters are not
ICEs. The Linux kernel still needs to be modified to make use of these
when building with Clang; I have a patch that does so I will send once
this feature is landed.
To do so, we create a new IR level Function attribute, "dontcall" (both
error and warning boil down to one IR Fn Attr). Then, similar to calls
to inline asm, we attach a !srcloc Metadata node to call sites of such
attributed callees.
The backend diagnoses these during instruction selection, while we still
know that a call is a call (vs say a JMP that's a tail call) in an arch
agnostic manner.
The frontend then reconstructs the SourceLocation from that Metadata,
and determines whether to emit an error or warning based on the callee's
attribute.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16428
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1173
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030
Some Clang diagnostics could only report OpenCL C version. Because
C++ for OpenCL can be used as an alternative to OpenCL C, the text
for diagnostics should reflect that.
Desrciptions modified for these diagnostics:
`err_opencl_unknown_type_specifier`
`warn_option_invalid_ocl_version`
`err_attribute_requires_opencl_version`
`warn_opencl_attr_deprecated_ignored`
`ext_opencl_ext_vector_type_rgba_selector`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107648
Clang diagnostics refer to identifier names in quotes.
This patch makes inline remarks conform to the convention.
New behavior:
```
% clang -O2 -Rpass=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -S a.c
a.c:4:25: remark: 'foo' inlined into 'bar' with (cost=-30, threshold=337) at callsite bar:0:25; [-Rpass=inline]
int bar(int a) { return foo(a); }
^
```
Reviewed By: hoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107791
Clang diagnostics should not start with a capital letter or use
trailing punctuation (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html#the-format-string),
but quite a few driver diagnostics were not following this advice. This
corrects the grammar and punctuation to improve consistency, but does
not change the circumstances under which the diagnostics are produced.
Paul Kirth